Jump to content

Multiple moves. Armstrong, Waddell DFA

eddie83

By eddie83
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

sportsfan8703 Hangout Grand Counsel

sportsfan8703

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Huh?   You post this in a thread in which it is announced that we have DFA'd Armstrong????

That IS cutting bait.   We just cut bait with Armstrong and you are screaming that we aren't?

Step away from the ledge.

Step off your high horse, I thought only Waddell was DFA’d. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tony-OH Hangout Grand Counsel

Tony-OH

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, scOtt said:

Not that it matters much but Armstrong can probably opt for free agency if he's not claimed, right?

Yes, he can choose free agency if he's not claimed. Actually I think he can claim free agency IF he's claimed, like Steve Pearce did when the Blue Jays claimed him but he rejected the claim because he knew he was going to be back in Baltimore.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bpilktree Hangout Grand Counsel

bpilktree

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Something strange about the Leyba acquisition.   It is his 4th option.  He was optioned in 2017, 2018, 2019 and now 2021.   Normally only get 3 options.   There is something going on there but I do not know what it is.

You can get 4th option with the 5 full years or if a player does not select free agency even on the 4th option.  I am guessing the second reason is this one based on him having 5 full years already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wildcard Hangout Grand Counsel

wildcard

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, bpilktree said:

You can get 4th option with the 5 full years or if a player does not select free agency even on the 4th option.  I am guessing the second reason is this one based on him having 5 full years already.

I am not sure what this means.   Do you have a link for that rule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bpilktree Hangout Grand Counsel

bpilktree

Posted
Posted

Looking at it deeper 2013 and 2014 don not count as full years as they were short season leagues.  His first year counting towards the 5 full years rule was 2015.  That means the 5 year rule for him is 2015, 16, 17,18,19.  That means the 2019 option came before he had 5 full years  inn.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Safelykept
      Is Matt Wieters >Adley?

      By Safelykept · Posted

      If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • eddie83
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By eddie83 · Posted

      The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • HowAboutThat
      Erceg vs Seranthony Dominguez

      By HowAboutThat · Posted

      That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • Bemorewins
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • Fiver6565
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • Fiver6565
      Erceg vs Seranthony Dominguez

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • Bemorewins
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...