Jump to content

Negative production, no depth


eddie83

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, eddie83 said:

Elias needs some Roland Hemond magic. Find this version of Milligan, Devo, Tettleton, Orsulak, Bradley. Eventually Hoiles and Anderson became strong players. He basically rebuilt the lineup minus Cal from next to nothing. Trading Boddicker for Brady of course helped.  Lynn for Hoiles   

Hemond will be remembered for Eddie deal -not enough return and Davis trade. He did do some good things while he was here with a cheap owner. 
 

Different world now. I don’t see any trades bringing back that type of talent. Would be nice to find some undervalued players like Max Muncy, Urshela, Voit etc.  

I like what Elias has done with the draft and the international scouting, but he and his people have shown no ability to find these types of players. Most of his waiver claims were nothing more than replacement level or worse. Perhaps this is by design because he's trying to get good draft picks, but it has made for awful, awful baseball to watch at the major league level. 

Now his trading for prospects is still an unknown though several players are showing progress, but until they do well at the major league level he can't get credit for them yet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I like what Elias has done with the draft and the international scouting, but he and his people have shown no ability to find these types of players. Most of his waiver claims were nothing more than replacement level or worse. Perhaps this is by design because he's trying to get good draft picks, but it has made for awful, awful baseball to watch at the major league level. 

Now his trading for prospects is still an unknown though several players are showing progress, but until they do well at the major league level he can't get credit for them yet.

 

We can give Elias credit for trading for decent prospects, just not major leaguers yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s worth noting that Severino, who takes endless heat around here, current stands at +0.4 rWAR.   Sisco and Wynns each at -0.3 with OPS sub-.440.    

Of course, fWAR has him at -0.2.   

What annoys me about Severino is that he came here with a reputation as a glove-first catcher.   It just seems like he has the tools to be better defensively than he is.   Just too many occasions where he doesn’t move his feet when the pitch is wide of the plate to get his body in front of the ball.   And, he seems to lose focus on actually catching the baseball at times.   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

It’s worth noting that Severino, who takes endless heat around here, current stands at +0.4 rWAR.   Sisco and Wynns each at -0.3 with OPS sub-.440.    

Of course, fWAR has him at -0.2.   

What annoys me about Severino is that he came here with a reputation as a glove-first catcher.   It just seems like he has the tools to be better defensively than he is.   Just too many occasions where he doesn’t move his feet when the pitch is wide of the plate to get his body in front of the ball.   And, he seems to lose focus on actually catching the baseball at times.   

 

I've noticed that over the season.

It leads me to doubt rWAR more than anything else.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s worth noting that Severino, who takes endless heat around here, current stands at +0.4 rWAR.   Sisco and Wynns each at -0.3 with OPS sub-.440.    

Of course, fWAR has him at -0.2.   

What annoys me about Severino is that he came here with a reputation as a glove-first catcher.   It just seems like he has the tools to be better defensively than he is.   Just too many occasions where he doesn’t move his feet when the pitch is wide of the plate to get his body in front of the ball.   And, he seems to lose focus on actually catching the baseball at times.   

 

I think catchers that make it to the majors and don't hit well often get labelled as "glove-first" just as a kneejerk reaction.   People must feel that he wouldn't have made the majors if he didn't bring something to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I think catchers that make it to the majors and don't hit well often get labelled as "glove-first" just as a kneejerk reaction.   People must feel that he wouldn't have made the majors if he didn't bring something to the table.

We can check the Mets fan pages and test your theory.  ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've noticed that over the season.

It leads me to doubt rWAR more than anything else.

 

Catcher defense is probably the hardest thing to measure in baseball.   I don’t really understand what metric rWAR is using for catcher defense.  At all other positions, they use Rdrs and call it Rfield when used as a component of rWAR.  But for Severino, Rdrs is -9 whereas Rfield is +1.    So clearly they’re using something else - Lord knows what, since I’m not aware of any other metric that has Severino’s defense in positive territory.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...