Jump to content

Brad Hand, anyone?


HowAboutThat

Recommended Posts

I’m inclined to pass on him too, but he does have a Pedigree, his velocity is up this year over last year, although his swing strike rate is down. He could be signed for the prorated major league minimum after he clears waivers, and you gotta live the Nats paying him a couple million bucks to play across town.

And I’d rather have him than Shaun Anderson or Plutko or many another arm that has called OPACY home for a day or so. I’m not hoping for it, just mentioning it as a possibility. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Philip said:

I’m inclined to pass on him too, but he does have a Pedigree, his velocity is up this year over last year, although his swing strike rate is down. He could be signed for the prorated major league minimum after he clears waivers, and you gotta live the Nats paying him a couple million bucks to play across town.

And I’d rather have him than Shaun Anderson or Plutko or many another arm that has called OPACY home for a day or so. I’m not hoping for it, just mentioning it as a possibility. Just a thought.

The awfulness of the bullpen is why I'd consider Hand even if he's likely to be a stopgap for a year or two. If you could get him on the cheap with an incentive laden contract it might be worth a play.

I think it's likely Hand gets more money and an offer from a better team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather bring up guys like Kevin Smith and Dean Kremer for the rest of the season and use them in bullpen roles.  Both have high SO rates, and we should be seeing what they can do in the majors.  Salvage what's been an awful year for Kremer, and be honest that Smith's future is as a reliever.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Philip said:

So the Blue Jays just dumped brad hand. I haven’t checked the stats, although he’s been pretty terrible recently, are we the least bit interested? We picked up Shaun Anderson, and Hand at least has a pedigree.

He started the year with 9 straight scoreless appearances.   Since then he has been pretty bad.

If he had had this season with the Orioles, you would be talking about how you've seen enough of him and it's time to dump him and replace him with anybody. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SteveA said:

He started the year with 9 straight scoreless appearances.   Since then he has been pretty bad.

If he had had this season with the Orioles, you would be talking about how you've seen enough of him and it's time to dump him and replace him with anybody. 

Maybe that’s correct, maybe not. Remind me how many guys we had start the season with nine straight scoreless appearances? Plutko started well, But I didn’t want to keep him. I don’t remember whether Tate had a good stretch, I think Armstrong did, and frankly, I would’ve been willing to keep him, even though I didn’t protest when he was dumped. 
Someone with a valid past is always worth taking a flyer on, as we did with Harvey and Felix. I had no problem with Harvey, and I thought-correctly- that Felix was toast but it was a minor league contract so why not. Hand can be had for prorated minimum Which by now is only a couple hundred thousand dollars, so there’s no reason not to bring him on board and see if we can do something with him. I am a firm believer in “change of scenery” And if he’s terrible, well what have we lost? That’s exactly the logic that has brought almost everybody else on board lately, anyway, no need to change it now. If we don’t I won’t complain, even if he turns into something good for somebody else, it’s just a thought.

what are yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Maybe that’s correct, maybe not. Remind me how many guys we had start the season with nine straight scoreless appearances? Plutko started well, But I didn’t want to keep him. I don’t remember whether Tate had a good stretch, I think Armstrong did, and frankly, I would’ve been willing to keep him, even though I didn’t protest when he was dumped. 
Someone with a valid past is always worth taking a flyer on, as we did with Harvey and Felix. I had no problem with Harvey, and I thought-correctly- that Felix was toast but it was a minor league contract so why not. Hand can be had for prorated minimum Which by now is only a couple hundred thousand dollars, so there’s no reason not to bring him on board and see if we can do something with him. I am a firm believer in “change of scenery” And if he’s terrible, well what have we lost? That’s exactly the logic that has brought almost everybody else on board lately, anyway, no need to change it now. If we don’t I won’t complain, even if he turns into something good for somebody else, it’s just a thought.

what are yours?

Fry started great.

Hand -- we could get him for the minimum the rest of the year with Toronto paying him.   But if he does well, he will be a free agent in the offseason and will cost veteran free agent money to sign, and I don't think he would be worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ruzious said:

I'd rather bring up guys like Kevin Smith and Dean Kremer for the rest of the season and use them in bullpen roles.  Both have high SO rates, and we should be seeing what they can do in the majors.  Salvage what's been an awful year for Kremer, and be honest that Smith's future is as a reliever.   

Excellent idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Fry started great.

Hand -- we could get him for the minimum the rest of the year with Toronto paying him.   But if he does well, he will be a free agent in the offseason and will cost veteran free agent money to sign, and I don't think he would be worth it.

I agree that we shouldn’t pay them free agent prices, however remember Nate McLouth, we picked him up off the waiver wire, in 2012, he  finish out the year for us and was fabulous, Couldn’t get a big free agent deal in the off-season came to us on a one-year contract, and he was excellent for us again. The Nats sign him for two years in $10 million and he immediately fell off a cliff.

No way would hand cost as much as McLouth did, But of course we wouldn’t be the least bit interested in signing him for anything but a pittance anyway. However down below the comment was made that they would rather bring up some of our own Pitching, and I’m inclined to agree with that. Again, I have no horse in this race, and I don’t care one way or the other, I just mention him because he is a formerly very successful reliever, and I thought it might be a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • You mean like spank the yankees a couple times this week??
    • I notice Coby Mayo listed as a RF. 
    • Astros admit it is a knee sprain for Yordan and he is out the Mariners series, with hoped for return at the Guardians Friday. He will play the playoffs and I guess benefit from that infielders on the dirt rule, as otherwise defenses might have been able to put all of them well on to the grass like Pujols at the end. Mariners got the must opener with "just" Bryce Miller - now they have Logan Gilbert and George Kirby tonight and tomorrow afternoon against Yordan-free lineups to try and make the weekend interesting.
    • I think a lot of fans frustration (well, at least mine) comes from a combination of this specific team and history.  This 2024 team has been extremely frustrating.  It is factually true that in the last 106 games they have only one walk-off win and only two wins when trailing after 6 innings. They have no series wins against an over .500 team since July 4th, and the worst record in the AL East since June 20. They cannot put together any long winning streaks, they have a real hard time generating a "big" inning, their all-star catcher has had an extremely disappointing second half, and their prized rookies have been far worse than anyone could have imagined.  So this has been without question a three-month plus malaise that feels like it just won't end.  Every time we want to feel enthusiastic or excited, we get shut down by a punch in the gut like Saturday and Sunday. The injuries have undoubtedly played a role, but I don't buy that they should have played this much of a role. Especially not on offense. The history part of it does not relate to the current team, but is a real pain point for fans like me who have been around for decades.  This organization last won an LCS game on October 13, 1997.  Almost 27 years since their last single game win in the LCS. Think about that and how much life has passed since that time.  Over those 27 years, 22 different fanbases have experienced their team in the World Series at least once.  If we go back to the last time the Orioles won the pennant, we can add another 4 fanbases to the list of World Series participants.  I think a 3 game sweep in last year's playoffs hurts us far more than it would Red Sox fans or Cardinals fans or Dodgers fans who are there regularly.  We have far fewer bites at the apple than most other fans, and every opportunity lost just resonates that much more.   No one should ever think the Orioles fans are spoiled, regardless of how much we may complain.  We are among the least spoiled fanbases not only in baseball, but in all of professional sports.  
    • Wowww. 4 years in a row, that is damn impressive. 
    • He's absolutely right, but of course, anything prior to the 2023 sweep means nothing to this current squad.  Last year we got a glimpse into this team with pressure. We all, including me, pointed towards their inexperience, but now we have a 2nd half of a season with mostly the same players wilting under pressure. Whether that pressure be because of the game situation, expectations, trying to do too much with other players out, or whatever, we have another data point of this current team struggling when it matters. Now, barring a complete a total collapse by the Orioles over the last two series of the year (not out of the question but the that the Royals and Twins are crashing too make it almost assured this team will back into the playoffs), this team is going to the playoffs. This will be the real test because gone are the excuses of injury with Westburg, Urias, Coulombe and Webb back and the team will most likely face another struggling wild card team. That should give some hope that this team will win at least a game, and maybe a series if things go right.  Crazier things have happened before in the playoffs, but only a miracle World Series appearance would be able to overcome this frustrating season and end the discussion over the lack of clutch of this core group of players.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...