Jump to content

This choking bullpen is killing me


Frobby

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Frobby said:

With tonight’s blown save, the Orioles bullpen now has a sub-50% save rate on the season (22/45).    You want to know why this team is worse than we thought they’d be?   Look no further than that.   

I really thought Wells was going to be the guy with the stuff and disposition to close.   And maybe he still will be.   But seeing him blow his second straight opportunity was extremely disheartening.   Last time he just didn’t have it, but I think tonight game down to having lost confidence from the last outing.   You just cannot come in with a one-run lead and walk the leadoff hitter.  Kind’ve tough luck to have it start raining and Gardner’s hit was underwhelming, but still, the walk set up the whole mess.   
 

I wonder how many of those blown saves resulted in losses. While the inability to hold the lead on the rare occasions when we're ahead late in a close game drives me crazy, triply so when it gives the NYYs a win, to me it's not nearly as big a factor in the team's terrible record as the woeful starting pitching (when Means isn't pitching). A bunch of the blown saves come from guys we won't be seeing any more (Plutko and Valdez). 

Wells wasn't hit hard last night. A single and that stupid bloop. The problems were the lead-off walk and Wells' inability to get the third strike on Gardner. Some bad umpiring hurt, too. What bothers me about the relief situation is that I'd hoped that by the end of the season we'd have a better idea who might close (or, more accurately, be the reliever in the highest-leverage situations) for the next couple of years. Wells? Sulser? Tate? I feel like the Orioles don't know any more about that than they did two months ago. I don't, anyhow.

I've never understood why you automatically bring the infield in when you're the home team, there are less than two outs, and a ground ball with the infield back will give up the tying run, but a hit between (or over) the drawn-in infielders will lead to both the tying and go-ahead runs. That might be the right move, especially when you have some real bad hitters due up in the bottom of the inning and no ability to pinch hit, as was the case last night. But that factor cuts both ways: if you give up both runs, those weak hitters will be facing Chapman, and you saw what that looks like.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spiritof66 said:

Wells' inability to get the third strike on Gardner. Some bad umpiring hurt, too.

That WAS a strike. The Umpire is a NY fan or something and didn’t give it to him. I made a screen shot of that pitch which was solid low center of the zone. I wish I could share it here but seems you can’t post your own photos. It was a Terrible call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, spiritof66 said:

 

I've never understood why you automatically bring the infield in when you're the home team, there are less than two outs, and a ground ball with the infield back will give up the tying run, but a hit between (or over) the drawn-in infielders will lead to both the tying and go-ahead runs. That might be the right move, especially when you have some real bad hitters due up in the bottom of the inning and no ability to pinch hit, as was the case last night. But that factor cuts both ways: if you give up both runs, those weak hitters will be facing Chapman, and you saw what that looks like.

Hyde isn’t good.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I think the bullpen has just been so taxed this year that it’s really hard to even evaluate guys. 
 

Let me make it clear that I want us to have the #1 overall pick. So I don’t care about letting some retread relievers help gets us there. 
 

However, there is hope for next year,

Bautista, Wells, Scott, Sulser, Fry, Burdi, Tate, Fry, Lopez and Harvey. Mix in some of the failed SP and we should have a much improved BP. 
 

A bullpen can only do so well with a terrible rotation. 

The bullpen has been taxed as a unit, but individual members have not been particularly taxed.   Nobody in the entire bullpen has thrown 60 innings.   So I don’t feel that workload is an excuse for any individual pitcher.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The bullpen has been taxed as a unit, but individual members have not been particularly taxed.   Nobody in the entire bullpen has thrown 60 innings.   So I don’t feel that workload is an excuse for any individual pitcher.   

I think that underscores that the management has been relatively good in the sense that they have managed work loads.  The problem is that too few of the pitchers have pitched well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Tyler Wells

Cole Sulser

Tanner Scott

Felix Bautista

Ofelky Peralta

Kyle Bradish

Michael Baumann

Zach Burdi

Paul Fry

There are some pieces to put together a bullpen with potential.  How would it do next season is another question.

Conor Greene and Lopez too. Maybe Hunter Harvey for 20 innings. Would be nice to have a dependable veteran to build around though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Tyler Wells

Cole Sulser

Tanner Scott

Felix Bautista

Ofelky Peralta

Kyle Bradish

Michael Baumann

Zach Burdi

Paul Fry

There are some pieces to put together a bullpen with potential.  How would it do next season is another question.

They need to add two veteran relievers who can get hitters out and push some of these guys to AAA.

Agree with adding Greene and Lopez to the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...