Jump to content

Payroll expectation for 2022


Sports Guy

2022 Payroll  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. What range do you expect the 2022 payroll to be in?

    • 40 million or less
      8
    • 41-50 million
      10
    • 51-60 million
      16
    • 61-70 million
      12
    • 70+ million
      4


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

When was it ever decided that it was 3 years?  It was always reported 2 years.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-retires-20210812-b2ex4xdfcre2hiuz2zimv5rlxu-story.html%3foutputType=amp
 

I missed this.  Maybe 2 years were the first reports but it ended up being 3.  Thanks for pointing that out @Frobby
 

So, that drops him from 8.5M to about 5.7M.  So, overall payroll for the way I see it is in the 29-32M range for the 5 guys off the roster plus the other 18-20 players on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, owknows said:

I'm betting the league institutes a payroll minmum (probably 80 million instead of the proposed 100 miliion), and the Orioles come in on the dot.

This is definitely a good point.  I’m guessing if/when they do this, it’s a tiered system.  Probably tell teams they need to do this by a certain year but that it needs to start going up now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

This is definitely a good point.  I’m guessing if/when they do this, it’s a tiered system.  Probably tell teams they need to do this by a certain year but that it needs to start going up now.

Start at 60 in the first season and increase 10 per until it hits whatever floor gets approved...if any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, owknows said:

I'm betting the league institutes a payroll minmum (probably 80 million instead of the proposed 100 miliion), and the Orioles come in on the dot.

If they instituted something like this, I would think they would give organizations more than one offseason to get to that number.  It would hurt the lower market teams competitively to be forced to increase their payroll by 30 million in a single offseason. 

You'll end up seeing a lot of overpaid mid-tier/lower-tier free agents get signed to bad contracts like you see in the NBA after the better players turn down our confederate money.  Who is the Ian Mahinme and Andrew Nicholson of this FA class? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No..look, I’m not trying to be an ass here but I have answered all of these questions in various posts in the thread.  I’m just not sure where the confusion is?
 

My personal outlook discussed Mancini.  I’m not saying I’m right, I’m just saying that Mancini isn’t in my projections as guaranteed guys on the 26 man roster (at some point..don’t know when Adley and Grayson will be there but it will be quickly imo).  Santander is the same.

 

Lol, I'm not trying to be an ass either but your OP excluded deferments, then you said they are included. You also just went and changed the number for Davis after this post. Could you take four seconds and give me one number for deferments? Bonus points if you edit and update your original post.  Or maybe you aren't actually interested in a discussion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Lol, I'm not trying to be an ass either but your OP excluded deferments, then you said they are included. You also just went and changed the number for Davis after this post. Could you take four seconds and give me one number for deferments? Bonus points if you edit and update your original post.  Or maybe you aren't actually interested in a discussion?

Yes and then the very next post, CoC put the link to the 4 guys we owe money to…and then in my second post, I spoke about that money and the money owed to Davis.  
 

The number was the same foe the whole time until Frobby just pointed out that it’s 3 years and not 2.  I mean, simple math tells you that’s about 2.5M less but if you can’t do that (after I already did), that puts you at less than 16M for the 5 players not on the team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Deferred salary for 2022

5.7m Davis

2m Cobb

1.5m Trumbo

1m  O'Day

1m Cashner

11.2m Total

The original spotrac link that CoC posted said 6.5M for Cobb.  
 

Looking at things, that doesn’t appear to be accurate, which is why I hate spotrac.

I think what WC is posting here is likely more accurate.  So, instead of the original thought of 18.5M and then just under 16M, we should be around 11 as wildcard is saying here.

That should put the payroll in the 24-28M range for the projected payroll based off of my expected roster.  Of course, not everyone is going to have the same expected roster.  

@wildcard, thank you for pointing out the discrepancy for Cobb 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

This is definitely a good point.  I’m guessing if/when they do this, it’s a tiered system.  Probably tell teams they need to do this by a certain year but that it needs to start going up now.

Yeah... almost certainly would be phased in instead of a hard cut-in...

At first I thought this proposal was unlikely... but in the end I think it may be used as a Collective Bargaining ploy to avoid a work stoppage...

lower the luxury tax threshold so that it hits more teams... create a significantly high minimum payroll..

 

luxury tax has a negative salary impact on superstars... (who are small in number)... 

minimum payroll has a positive salary impact on pretty much everyone else.  Might split the player vote between the haves and have-nots.... but in the end it makes the CBA easier to achieve.

I think this has a real chance of happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Just went with 50-60 based on the $11M number for deferrals. $15M for prearb guys, $20M for arb guys, still leaves $4M-$14M for free agents. Could trade Mancini and spend a bit more.

$15 mill for prearb guys sounds high, since the O's like to give guys $10k raises or something similar.  Even if the $4-14 M figure is low, it reinforces my idea that Santander/Mancini should be traded/non tendered.  I can only think that Stowers is in the AFL because Elias thinks he will be a ML outfielder next year.  I could see the O's replacing Santander/Mancini w/ a cheap stopgap for $2 mill or less.  Looks like the best hopes for next year's team is a Cashner type signing that actually works and a veteran reliever, obviously not top tier.  At least one somewhat dependable 2b/SS/3B player needs to be signed and the O's could patch a lineup around them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, owknows said:

Yeah... almost certainly would be phased in instead of a hard cut-in...

At first I thought this proposal was unlikely... but in the end I think it may be used as a Collective Bargaining ploy to avoid a work stoppage...

lower the luxury tax threshold so that it hits more teams... create a significantly high minimum payroll..

 

luxury tax has a negative salary impact on superstars... (who are small in number)... 

minimum payroll has a positive salary impact on pretty much everyone else.  Might split the player vote between the haves and have-nots.... but in the end it makes the CBA easier to achieve.

I think this has a real chance of happening

I can't see the MLBPA decreasing the luxury tax, at least w/o a strike.  Who knows, maybe they would settle for a system that increases player revenue.  I was thinking a system that increases salary minimums for veteran players (money would obviously have to come from somewhere).  NBA has a system like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You think we are signing Burnes?
    • Oh, I thought he was talking about the rotation right now.
    • No. Better yet ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!  We do we need to take on anything associated with him or take on that kind of pr hit and risk? I hope he gets a shot at redemption … somewhere else. Why can’t we just acquire/trade for a current MLB pitcher who is already good and doesn’t come with baggage? Is that too much to ask?
    • My big issue with him besides the zero defensive value is he's batting .227 and has only 5 doubles which tells me he's probably a mistake hitter. That's a big red flag for me as well when I look at stats, especially lower level guys. Guys with decent home run numbers and low 2B numbers typically are guys who feast on those middle-middle pitches, but are not making consistent hard contact to get those 2B numbers up. Now I'm going off memory here and haven't really watched him a ton this year running, but he's pretty dang slow from what I remember. So now we have a short, slow, 1B/DH who has some ability to make decent swing decisions on Low-A hitters, but hits for a low average and doesn't show a lot of extra base power. So is he a guy that you perhaps follow to see if he's a guy that develops more game power and allows his bat to carry him up the chain? Perhaps. But I just don't know what he would be in the majors besides a right-handed DH if he develops more power. How many are those are now in the game? I mean, perhaps his absolute upside is a Yermín Mercedes type, but I imagine if he is a late bloomer guy who suddenly starts to rake at the upper levels, it will probably be for his 2nd or 3rd organization as those guys typically bounce around.
    • Thanks for sharing all of the formula / data prospect trackers, I don’t have the patience to follow them on Twitter so I appreciate the updates here. I do put value in that when projecting offense and they do have data that we don’t have.  RZNJ and Tony have a good point that the robo scout types are generally not going to consider defense (at least not fully), and as everyone knows that’s a massive difference in value for C v. 1B/DH. So for Mordan I’d only really put weight on the robo scout if it said he was a good prospect even as solely a 1B, and I’m guessing he’s not.  I am curious to track development of C like Willems and Mordan because I think any C in the system behind Basallo are prime trade chips. If Mordan has good offensive data but bad defense, seems like a nice guy to try to sell another team on at the trade deadline. 
    • I am curious to see what happens with the Astros and Verlander.  Looks like they may be heating up making it irrelevant but if they end up being a seller and he shows he is healthy before the deadline I think Verlander is the guy Elias targets.  I think with our new ownership and low payroll no reason we cannot take on the remainder of that contract and he could be the perfect replacement for Bradish. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...