deward Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Ripken said: The eyesore. I second this one. I also like Elias' Folly. Edited March 23, 2022 by deward 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobmc Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 5 hours ago, deward said: I second this one. I also like Elias' Folly. I posted that last night - but uncertain if I was the only one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdelaware Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 It still reminds me of the fence in PNC Park but a little more extreme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yossarian Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 This essentially puts the left fielder on an island. The centerfielder will not be able to run over, turn right at the corner all while trying to track a fly ball. It will also make life difficult for the umpires. The unnatural corner in the middle of the field will make it difficult to get a proper angle to determine if a catch was, or wasn't, made. The sight lines from the infield will be changed dramatically. I hope they set up cameras to pick up the nuances of these changes to help on reviews. What's the view like from the two dugouts? Does one manager have an advantage with a better angle than the other to ask for a review? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveA Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 1 hour ago, Yossarian said: This essentially puts the left fielder on an island. The centerfielder will not be able to run over, turn right at the corner all while trying to track a fly ball. It will also make life difficult for the umpires. The unnatural corner in the middle of the field will make it difficult to get a proper angle to determine if a catch was, or wasn't, made. The sight lines from the infield will be changed dramatically. I hope they set up cameras to pick up the nuances of these changes to help on reviews. What's the view like from the two dugouts? Does one manager have an advantage with a better angle than the other to ask for a review? Even the fan sight lines will miss a spot from many places in the ballpark. That often happens in the corners, but it is pretty rare to have a spot in the middle of the outfield that isn't visible from every single infield/baseline seat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deward Posted March 23, 2022 Share Posted March 23, 2022 2 hours ago, SteveA said: Even the fan sight lines will miss a spot from many places in the ballpark. That often happens in the corners, but it is pretty rare to have a spot in the middle of the outfield that isn't visible from every single infield/baseline seat. I suspect that the fan experience was very low on the list of considerations when they came up with this dumb idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NashLumber Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 23 hours ago, PHRESH said: I like this. It's like the Hilton has spread into the stadium. The Bromo Corner. Maybe paint a simulated aclock face and turret to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 On 3/22/2022 at 7:08 PM, oriole said: Imagine tracking a long fly ball in left center and not knowing if you’re about to run full speed into a 90 degree corner. We could ask Willie Mays how he managed to play 399 games at the Polo Grounds and its abrupt angles in CF without dying. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waroriole Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Good thing we have a guy with CF potential in LF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DrungoHazewood Posted March 24, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted March 24, 2022 Positives to this change: Makes baseball at OPACY more of an athletic competition with fielders given space to run, and hitters not being able to sit back and wait for cheap homers as much. If teams across MLB were to do things like this it could force the game to adopt more contact and speed oriented strategies and rosters, rather than wall-to-wall Chris Davis clones. Ballparks have long been designed to the specs of the 1920s, and players are much larger and more athletic, parks should be scaled appropriately. Negatives: It's not how Camden Yards looked in 1992, so it's dumb and stupid and I want them to put it back. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxfield Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I haven't decided. The park is the most brilliant addition to the game in my lifetime. I have loved it in spite of the horrible management of the team. But the game has changed alot and this move could help. But I will have to see some games to really accept it. Drungo above makes the simple point that its a different look so it's dumb. I get that. Let's see how it plays. I would say the change makes OF like Mountcastle, or Stewart unplayable. Right? Right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Milligan Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 Still giving it time for them to put some of the matching green padding on it to see how it looks. And of course, seeing how it plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sports Guy Posted March 24, 2022 Author Share Posted March 24, 2022 49 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said: Positives to this change: Makes baseball at OPACY more of an athletic competition with fielders given space to run, and hitters not being able to sit back and wait for cheap homers as much. If teams across MLB were to do things like this it could force the game to adopt more contact and speed oriented strategies and rosters, rather than wall-to-wall Chris Davis clones. Ballparks have long been designed to the specs of the 1920s, and players are much larger and more athletic, parks should be scaled appropriately. Negatives: It's not how Camden Yards looked in 1992, so it's dumb and stupid and I want them to put it back. Exactly right. The people pushing back on this are so absurd and btw, many of those people probably hate the 3 outcome sport it has become. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookinUp Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 I like that they did it because I do want athleticism to matter, but I sure wish they moved the lower bullpen into CF. Plenty of space to do so. The corner is stupid, and not just because it's different. It's basically a gimmick. At least there's not a pillar or a hill right in the field of play, but it's still bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybenxtyr Posted March 24, 2022 Share Posted March 24, 2022 1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said: Positives to this change: Makes baseball at OPACY more of an athletic competition with fielders given space to run, and hitters not being able to sit back and wait for cheap homers as much. If teams across MLB were to do things like this it could force the game to adopt more contact and speed oriented strategies and rosters, rather than wall-to-wall Chris Davis clones. Ballparks have long been designed to the specs of the 1920s, and players are much larger and more athletic, parks should be scaled appropriately. Negatives: It's not how Camden Yards looked in 1992, so it's dumb and stupid and I want them to put it back. I kinda like it. Hopefully nobody wipes out on the angle. Camden Yards is still one of the best baseball stadiums around in my opinion. I suspect that the home team will adjust rather quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.