Jump to content

John Means 2022


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Even with his low innings, Means has averaged like 4 WAR a season the last three years- prorating the shortened season.

I'm not sure where that qualifies as a "back of the rotation guy."

Obviously, it doesn't. I am not exactly impressed with his stuff except for the CH, which if he doesn't have, makes him mediocre. As always, I'll be happy if he proves me wrong and continues with the production you noted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, oriole said:

I hate to say it but until he can put up some numbers like he did before they started cracking down on the sticky stuff then I don’t think I totally believe he was as good as he seemed. 

I think by the end of ST MLB will institute the "Bautista rule" which allows some kind stickiness to improve grip.   With Bautista throwing 100mph without any stickiness it could be dangerous.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Il BuonO said:

Obviously, it doesn't. I am not exactly impressed with his stuff except for the CH, which if he doesn't have, makes him mediocre. As always, I'll be happy if he proves me wrong and continues with the production you noted.

His stuff isn't great w/o the change.  The fastballs average, maybe a tick above; the breaking ball is below average; the command is good though.

However, that changeup, when it's going, may well be the best straight change I've seen from  LHP in my lifetime.  That feels hyperbolic, and perhaps it is, but I honestly can't remember a better one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pickles said:

His stuff isn't great w/o the change.  The fastballs average, maybe a tick above; the breaking ball is below average; the command is good though.

However, that changeup, when it's going, may well be the best straight change I've seen from  LHP in my lifetime.  That feels hyperbolic, and perhaps it is, but I honestly can't remember a better one.

Moyer?  Buehrle?  Santana?  Liriano?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Moyer?  Buehrle?  Santana?  Liriano?

I thought of Moyer but I considered his change more of a circle change w fade.

I remember Santana's more as a split w drop.

I recall Liriano as a young flamethrower with a great breaking ball.

Buehrle is a pretty good comp.

These are of course just my personal remembrances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I thought of Moyer but I considered his change more of a circle change w fade.

I remember Santana's more as a split w drop.

I recall Liriano as a young flamethrower with a great breaking ball.

Buehrle is a pretty good comp.

These are of course just my personal remembrances.

I’m not too good at differentiating the different types of change ups.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2022 at 3:06 PM, Pickles said:

His stuff isn't great w/o the change.  The fastballs average, maybe a tick above; the breaking ball is below average; the command is good though.

However, that changeup, when it's going, may well be the best straight change I've seen from  LHP in my lifetime.  That feels hyperbolic, and perhaps it is, but I honestly can't remember a better one.

You’re not wrong. When he has it, it’s beautiful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the sticky-stuff talk is interesting (not just for Means, but also for Paul Fry), but as I understand it, tack is supposed to increase spin rate, and judging by John Means pitch spin rates over 2021, there is not a real change between before and after the ban:

https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/john-means-607644?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...