Jump to content

MASN refuses to pay for travel costs


NelsonCruuuuuz

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, geschinger said:

Dumb decision - it makes the product suffer.  Probably worse than implied as I don't see how the costs of having 9 guys travel with a team is anywhere near "millions of dollars".  Ths savings have to be significantly less than that.

I thought the same thing.

That info is either way off or there are a lot of other costs we aren’t aware of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

But substantively it affects the quality of broadcasts. Announcers get a lot more feel for the game when they can look over the entire field. They can judge fly balls better, they can see things that are happening that the TV broadcast may not be picking up. .

I still can't forget that early game at Yankee Stadium last year where we won when Anthony Santander threw out the Yankee at the plate for the final out in the bottom of the 9th to preserve a 1 run win.

To me, that is about the most exciting way a game can end, even better than a walkoff HR

And broadcasting remotely from Camden Yards, Garceau totally lost the excitement of the moment, he didn't even realize the game was over.   Then I heard Melanie Newman's radio call replayed the next day and it was just a complete mishmash, didn't even let the listener know what was happening.

I know some of that was due to the talent, or lack of talent, by the two announcers, but I have to think there would have been at least a little more excitement in their call if they were there at Yankee Stadium.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They really don't even need all 9 guys, they could get by with half of that using the opposing team's feed and the quality would be significantly better with just announcers and a producer and engineer so long as the announcers could actually see the play in front of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteveA said:

I still can't forget that early game at Yankee Stadium last year where we won when Anthony Santander threw out the Yankee at the plate for the final out in the bottom of the 9th to preserve a 1 run win.

To me, that is about the most exciting way a game can end, even better than a walkoff HR

And broadcasting remotely from Camden Yards, Garceau totally lost the excitement of the moment, he didn't even realize the game was over.   Then I heard Melanie Newman's radio call replayed the next day and it was just a complete mishmash, didn't even let the listener know what was happening.

I know some of that was due to the talent, or lack of talent, by the two announcers, but I have to think there would have been at least a little more excitement in their call if they were there at Yankee Stadium.

 

It was not. Their in-booth video feed went out so they literally had no idea what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I still can't forget that early game at Yankee Stadium last year where we won when Anthony Santander threw out the Yankee at the plate for the final out in the bottom of the 9th to preserve a 1 run win.

To me, that is about the most exciting way a game can end, even better than a walkoff HR

And broadcasting remotely from Camden Yards, Garceau totally lost the excitement of the moment, he didn't even realize the game was over.   Then I heard Melanie Newman's radio call replayed the next day and it was just a complete mishmash, didn't even let the listener know what was happening.

I know some of that was due to the talent, or lack of talent, by the two announcers, but I have to think there would have been at least a little more excitement in their call if they were there at Yankee Stadium.

 

Oh, man...I do remember that game and that call by Garceau. That guy is so bland. I hope he's not going to be in the booth like he was last year. Dude just acts likes it's a 9-5 job. 🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a way, I'm fortunate. The only games I get to see here in Vermont are when they play Boston - NESN. Can't abide by ESPN announcers and don't do MLB or MLBTV.  I miss Palmer but Ek is good in a similar fashion. NESN does a quality job and their annoncers are not total homers.

MASN has never impressed me as a well run outfit and I doubt it will ever be until THE DISPUTE is finally put to bed or MASN is sold. I love my Orioles but MASN is an embarrasment of a sport's network to someone that spent most of their life in Maryland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's great logic.

Spend less of the team, pocket more in profits.

That's solid logic from ownership.

But they are flying Palmer from LA to Baltimore to announce the road games Is Ben McDonald still also doing TV color? How is that safety?

Are the Orioles and Nationals still the only teams that you can't stream?

Barely pay attention to the Orioles anymore. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Agreed, but it just seems a little more pronounced with Jorge.
    • That can be said about most hitters in the major leagues. 
    • If you execute your slider, you are in good shape against Mateo. If you hang your slider, RIP.
    • Yes - see Tony’s top 75 prospect ratings for last offseason. Miguel was ranked 35th. Strong defensive catcher with plus contact skills. Power was absent last year but emerged yesterday. I’d expect he’ll be top 15 by end of year. 
    • Baseball will change, there's almost no doubt about that. But it's very unlikely to change back to the ways of 50 or 100 years ago because there's no competitive advantage to do so. It will probably change in ways that we don't fully expect, and that haven't happened before. Unless the powers-that-be change the rules and conditions, which they've always been very reluctant to do, the strategies of today are the strategies of today because they win a lot more games than the strategies of 1970. I think it's more likely that we see individual pitchers pitch even less in each outing (although possibly more frequently) than it is we go back to complete games. Even if the rules are changed, say you can only have nine pitchers on the roster like was common 50 years ago, today's GMs and managers would just use each pitcher for three innings every three games instead of a four-man rotation with lots of complete games.
    • I try to not get too caught up in Mateo but I have to be honest. Watching him in person is just a treat. Love that he is playing so well and continue to be happy he is still an Oriole. 
    • Isn't is just weird that it took 100+ years to figure that out? Hey, that guy hits a bunch of balls right through the box, maybe we should have the second baseman move over that direction a little? Nah, if we do it so will everybody, and we like .350 hitters even when they're on the other team. It would be like a football game where there's a formation where a WR keeps getting completely open downfield and busting 40 yard plays, and it takes 35 years for defenses to adjust. "It's just how it is! If we cover that guy, then the running back might average five yards a carry!"
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...