Jump to content

Today is the deadline to exchange arbitration numbers


Frobby

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Meh, you’re making too big a deal of it IMO.    Mancini is asking for more than either MLBTR or Cot’s estimated for him.  The O’s are basically at the midpoint of the two estimates.   Means’ number is the same as MLBTR’s estimate, $300 k above Cots.   The O’s are $100 k below Cot’s.   I think it’s likely both settle, but I don’t think either side looks bad if they don’t.   

I know you feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way and like I said, I’m not even saying they are wrong here.

But the optics are terrible.  You can choose to ignore all the signs and how cheap they are but you ignoring it doesn’t make it less true. 
 

If there is one thing they have earned, is not getting the benefit of the doubt even if they are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I know you feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way and like I said, I’m not even saying they are wrong here.

But the optics are terrible.  You can choose to ignore all the signs and how cheap they are but you ignoring it doesn’t make it less true. 
 

If there is one thing they have earned, is not getting the benefit of the doubt even if they are correct.

No, I don’t feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way.   There’s many cheap things the Orioles do that I don’t like.   But I don’t think refusing to pay a player more than they think he’s likely to get in arbitration is one of those things.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure seems like he does to me or, at the very least tends to give them the benefit of the doubt.  

I do give them the benefit of the doubt.  That’s my nature in most things, not just as an Orioles fan.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I know you feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way and like I said, I’m not even saying they are wrong here.

But the optics are terrible.  You can choose to ignore all the signs and how cheap they are but you ignoring it doesn’t make it less true. 
 

If there is one thing they have earned, is not getting the benefit of the doubt even if they are correct.

The optics would be bad for another team but honestly this doesn't hurt the O's reputation since it's already at such a low level.  This would be like if Chris Brown got caught on video saying something mean to his girlfriend.  Yea it's bad but what do you expect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I know you feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way and like I said, I’m not even saying they are wrong here.

But the optics are terrible.  You can choose to ignore all the signs and how cheap they are but you ignoring it doesn’t make it less true. 
 

If there is one thing they have earned, is not getting the benefit of the doubt even if they are correct.

I know you feel the need to bash the organization every step of the way, and I'm not even saying they are right here.

But the bids are fine. You can choose to ignore all of the other examples and predictions that Frobby's posted but you ignoring them doesn't make it less true.

If there's one thing about arbitration, it's not to get too worked up when the two sides don't agree in advance.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I know you feel the need to bash the organization every step of the way, and I'm not even saying they are right here.

But the bids are fine. You can choose to ignore all of the other examples and predictions that Frobby's posted but you ignoring them doesn't make it less true.

If there's one thing about arbitration, it's not to get too worked up when the two sides don't agree in advance.

Yep.  I sure do and I’m not hiding from it.  They deserve every piece of bad PR they get until they show themselves to give a damn about the product, the fans and the players on the field.

And I already said that I’m not even saying they are wrong here.  But right or wrong doesn’t matter with this organization right now.  Every tiny bit of info that is even remotely bad or viewed as cheap looks terrible for them. 
 

They are getting crushed on social media for this.  And most people don’t get it or understand the process. However, everyone understands how terrible they have been and how they don’t care.  They understand how cheap they have been.  It looks bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

But right or wrong doesn’t matter with this organization right now.  

Well, this is just wrong. You're opinions are generally more credible when you can differentiate between the two. 

I'm on board about the pace of the rebuild and think the MASN stuff is just shameful, but the arbitration processes are perfectly normal.

So can we move on to more important things, like who do we get with a top 6 pick in the 2023 draft?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

Well, this is just wrong. You're opinions are generally more credible when you can differentiate between the two. 

I'm on board about the pace of the rebuild and think the MASN stuff is just shameful, but the arbitration processes are perfectly normal.

So can we move on to more important things, like who do we get with a top 6 pick in the 2023 draft?

I can differentiate between the 2 but im not foolish enough to think right and wrong are the only things in play here.  I understand how a business is run and what the importance of things are throughout an organization.

The Orioles reputation is awful and deservedly so.  It’s a pathetic organization being run as cheaply as possible right now.  So, everything looks bad when you are trying to cut any costs.  
 

When your fans see you trying to lose on purpose for 4 straight seasons and you having the lowest or one of the lowest payrolls in baseball, it looks bad when you are trying to save a few hundred K, especially when it’s your best pitcher and fan favorite.  
 

Nothing about this “looks good”.  You can be right and still look bad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Nothing about this “looks good”.  You can be right and still look bad.  

I can agree with that.   But I don’t think that’s a good reason to change course, at least most of the time.   I’d rather have them focus on changing the things that look bad because they are bad.  And honestly I don’t think this looks that bad, especially at this point when there hasn’t been a hearing.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I can agree with that.   But I don’t think that’s a good reason to change course, at least most of the time.   I’d rather have them focus on changing the things that look bad because they are bad.  And honestly I don’t think this looks that bad, especially at this point when there hasn’t been a hearing.   

Im not saying they should change course here.  I’m saying it looks bad and if you read social media pages and stuff, they are getting hammered by a lot of people.  Again, many of those people don’t understand the process but that doesn’t matter. 
 

Perception matters and the Orioles perception is horrible right now..and rightfully so.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I know you feel the need to defend the organization every step of the way and like I said, I’m not even saying they are wrong here.

The end of this sentence makes it seem more like you are being critical every step of the way (sometimes irrationally so) vs. Frobby defending the org. every step of the way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...