Jump to content

Kyle Bradish 2022


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

I know I'm probably in the minority on this but I never watch or listen to interviews from athletes. I'm guessing most of them are not all that interested in talking about what everyone just watched them do... good or bad. 

 

Now, I will listen to sports talk on XM all day long but I tend to tune out when they have an athlete on the phone with them. Heck, I used to watch the same exact Sports center over and over in the morning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

He's new.  He hasn't learned to give rehearsed, canned answers to everything.  At least he said he was going to be reviewing video to see what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

Took me awhile to find it:  https://video.masnlivestream.com/video/Kyle Bradish on his rough fourth inning against Twins/2170

 

It's not that bad, IMO.  Not all of these guys are going to be brilliant and engaging in front of the media.  Not all of these guys are going to like answering questions, especially after a bit of struggling.  Maybe there's a little bit of Bedard here, and that's fine.

Which brings me to the best ever Bedard/media exchange:

Bedard:  "I'm only allowing three questions."

Reporter:  "Why only three questions?"

Bedard:  "That's one."

I died.  That was hilarious.

 

Yeah not that bad. It's weird to suddenly have 5 microphones shoved in your face in a confined area when you're 25 and coming off your first bad outing. Nobody wants to do that. He just looked uncomfortable to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't had "top" pitching prospects coming up in years. Since Matusz and Tillman and Britton and Arrieta. I think we forget that there are adjustments and learning curves.

 

The dudes stuff, especially his breaking stuff, looks ELITE. He's "grooving" fastballs when he gets behind in counts. And he was too cute after a 6 run inning that the O's gave him when he just needed to attack after you get 6 runs. The "stuff" has been there, which makes me very exited. He's had plenty of dominant innings. He's just a few pitches bite him. I'm unbelievbly excited from what I've seen so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, emmett16 said:

That was one terrible post game interview.  Was messing up canned lines and acted like he was was annoyed to be doing an interview.  Doesn’t seem to have much going on upstairs.  He admitted he lost focus in the 4th and became a “fan” watching the offense put up runs.  Pretty frustrating inning.  Hope he bounces back in a big way. 

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, joelala said:

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

That he realizes what he did wrong means he probably will not repeat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joelala said:

Strongly disagree. He came off as extremely candid to me and frustrated with himself and humbled by his tough outing on the biggest stage in his sport. For how much we complain about the lack of transparency from the FO, his candor here was much appreciated by me. Not sure why you’d prefer stock lines to this  🤷‍♂️ 

Noted.   Where did I say I prefer canned lines?  I said he was messing up canned lines and that he didn’t look like he wanted to be in the interview.  To me, not a good look for a new guy.  I imagine he knew he was going to have to do interviews when he aspired to be a Major League Baseball player.  I thought he came off very robotic and generally disinterested.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

Took me awhile to find it:  https://video.masnlivestream.com/video/Kyle Bradish on his rough fourth inning against Twins/2170

 

It's not that bad, IMO.  Not all of these guys are going to be brilliant and engaging in front of the media.  Not all of these guys are going to like answering questions, especially after a bit of struggling.  Maybe there's a little bit of Bedard here, and that's fine.

Which brings me to the best ever Bedard/media exchange:

Bedard:  "I'm only allowing three questions."

Reporter:  "Why only three questions?"

Bedard:  "That's one."

I died.  That was hilarious.

 

That was the best post game interview ever.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Noted.   Where did I say I prefer canned lines?  I said he was messing up canned lines and that he didn’t look like he wanted to be in the interview.  To me, not a good look for a new guy.  I imagine he knew he was going to have to do interviews when he aspired to be a Major League Baseball player.  I thought he came off very robotic and generally disinterested.    

True, I misread your original post, my apologies.  I do understand your point of view, but seem to have a different read on his behavior. Crazy how subjective human behavior is! Hoping his next post game interview is after a W. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t feel picked on — I didn’t offer much detail regarding the changes I am hoping for. If my initial post didn’t sound like it, I do have more patience (at least a little more) than most. It may take more than a minute to get depth in the bullpen or an offense that can adjust in crunch time. I get that. I’m not in the torches and pitchforks crowd, but the O’s can’t sit on their hands either. That’s closer to where I’m at.  
    • I kept hoping, for the sake of my own enjoyment, that I'd eventually come around after having to look at it often enough, but, no, I still think it's ugly as sin. And I hate how it plays. 
    • Yeah, but after he was called back up and changed his pitch mix, in his last 8 starts he had a 9.4 SO/9. 
    • I certainly wouldn’t be surprised if he changed nothing in terms of strategy.  Look at what he traded recently right handed batters. I feel like it is more important to him to be innovative, and develop players that have been forgotten or have failed in the major leagues than it is to actually win a World Series. Obviously, that’s the end goal of all the things he’s doing, but he wants to do it in a way that looks innovative, and it looks like he knows more about the players that failed and how to fix them than any other person. I honestly believe that is why Hyde has been here so long. He does everything that he’s told and they don’t want to bring in a manager that won’t do that. I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a lineup made up for him every day and I also wouldn’t be surprised if the whole game plan was planned out for him. What do you do when and where.. Obviously the numbers mean a lot in baseball and are extremely  helpful but they’re not everything. 
    • I'll celebrate whoever we get in a high echelon of MLB talent, but unfortunately unpacking this season too soon I think I don't even really want to win the Burnes bidding. Elias will value the next half season of information on Felix, Grayson and Bradish to figure out who goes with Eflin.     The growth he showed this year winning the Burnes and Eflin trade markets adds confidence he'll staff the top of the pitching roster appropriately in July 2025. If he is very risk averse with Kremer, Povich and Suarez, people would flip out but people like Kyle Gibson, Patrick Corbin and Jose Quintana hit me as safe innings he might actually pursue.
    • The team's valuation only matters at time of sale. The owner's wealth in an uncapped sport like MLB determines how much the team can spend. Steve Cohen by any metric available has tons more millions to SPEND than Hal Steinbrenner. Steve Cohen has even operated at a deficit over 100 million before which I believe was in 2023. And most importantly he has the WILL to get into the deepest of pools when it comes to FA as he has already shown in his short time owning the Mets.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...