Jump to content

Connolly looks at why Elias signed Lyles


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BRobinsonfan said:

The good news is he can throw a lot of innings.  The bad news is those innings won't be pretty.  🤣

 

What you wonder is, if those innings are crappy, will they keep him in games anyway?

Like, do you just look past mediocre and bad performances to just get the innings to save the young arms?  
 

He will obviously have some good starts and some just ok starts.  Those you keep him in as long as possible but what about the bad starts.  
 

It will be interesting to see if they just keep him out there often to protect arms.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

They might now that the wall is moved back and once the O's are looking more like the Jays. But even in the good times the Orioles haven't been able to sign SPs. When Cobb is the biggest SP deal in franchise history, something is wrong. And that's when the team was good. In the 90s playoff years did they sign any big SPs? Nope. The perception has to change first. It's not about the money because someone will always be able to match or exceed the Orioles. 

Big name SPs do not come to play for the Orioles, no matter how much money is thrown at their feet. It's just not something that has ever happened. Elias is the first GM trying to finally address the perception of the ballpark. It's worth a shot. 

They haven’t signed pitching because they haven’t wanted to pay the price of pitching.  All of these other excuses are just window dressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They haven’t signed pitching because they haven’t wanted to pay the price of pitching.  All of these other excuses are just window dressing.

That's your opinion, and that's fine. For me there's a much more deep-seeded thing that has always existed about playing against the Yankees in Camden Yards. It's not good for any pitcher's career. For top-flight SP, the O's would have to basically pay a guy like the Mets paid Scherzer, just wildly blow past the highest offer. It's unrealistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

What you wonder is, if those innings are crappy, will they keep him in games anyway?

Like, do you just look past mediocre and bad performances to just get the innings to save the young arms?  
 

He will obviously have some good starts and some just ok starts.  Those you keep him in as long as possible but what about the bad starts.  
 

It will be interesting to see if they just keep him out there often to protect arms.  

Let's remember, they might not be trying to win this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, interloper said:

That's your opinion, and that's fine. For me there's a much more deep-seeded thing that has always existed about playing against the Yankees in Camden Yards. It's not good for any pitcher's career. For top-flight SP, the O's would have to basically pay a guy like the Mets paid Scherzer, just wildly blow past the highest offer. It's unrealistic. 

Yea, those things definitely exist..which is why you have to pay more.

So yes, it goes back to money and desire to do it.

BTW, I largely agree with them on their stance here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

We know they want Lyles for innings.  That has always been obvious.  If he can give the team even 160 innings in 2022, that would be fine.   After all, that is all you are paying for.

You aren’t paying for production because you know it won’t be that great. 
 

 

He doesn't have a great history of getting to 160 innings is the thing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Let's remember, they might not be trying to win this year.  

Exactly..that’s why I wonder if they will care. 
 

In about 1/3 of his starts last year, he gave up 5 or more runs.  I would expect that number to be similar this year as well.  In 3 of those 9 starts, he went at least 5 innings.

Do the Orioles say, F it.  Unless you are getting completely bombed early on, we are throwing you 5+ innings every game.  I think I would.  If you are down 5-0 in the third, you are basically done for the night anyway.  I know you can come back but for the most, you are done.  So do you say, we are going to get those extra few innings out of you and if that means we lose 10-2, so be it. But we are saving arms and getting the innings from you that we are paying you to get.

I honestly don’t think that’s a bad strategy, at least the first half of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Exactly..that’s why I wonder if they will care. 
 

In about 1/3 of his starts last year, he gave up 5 or more runs.  I would expect that number to be similar this year as well.  In 3 of those 9 starts, he went at least 5 innings.

Do the Orioles say, F it.  Unless you are getting completely bombed early on, we are throwing you 5+ innings every game.  I think I would.  If you are down 5-0 in the third, you are basically done for the night anyway.  I know you can come back but for the most, you are done.  So do you say, we are going to get those extra few innings out of you and if that means we lose 10-2, so be it. But we are saving arms and getting the innings from you that we are paying you to get.

I honestly don’t think that’s a bad strategy, at least the first half of the season.

Hey man, they moved the LF wall back.  That's gotta account for something.  

I agree, he's gotta get 5 innings every start no matter how bad he gets bombed early.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He doesn't have a great history of getting to 160 innings is the thing.

The important thing is that he while he was with Houston (when Elias was paying attention), between the Majors and minors, he threw 144.2 innings in 2009, 158.2 in 2010, 156.1 in 2011, 182 in 2012, and 165.1 in 2013.

The main reason he hasn't regularly thrown 160+ innings in the majors is that he arguably isn't good enough to be a Major League starting pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MurphDogg said:

The important thing is that he while he was with Houston (when Elias was paying attention), between the Majors and minors, he threw 144.2 innings in 2009, 158.2 in 2010, 156.1 in 2011, 182 in 2012, and 165.1 in 2013.

The main reason he hasn't regularly thrown 160+ innings in the majors is that he arguably isn't good enough to be a Major League starting pitcher.

The O's have not shown a willingness to hang a starter out to dry.  Also including the minors he still wasn't regularly hitting 160.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

What you wonder is, if those innings are crappy, will they keep him in games anyway?

Like, do you just look past mediocre and bad performances to just get the innings to save the young arms?  
 

He will obviously have some good starts and some just ok starts.  Those you keep him in as long as possible but what about the bad starts.  
 

It will be interesting to see if they just keep him out there often to protect arms.  

I'm guessing they'll use him similar to how Texas did.  There were only a couple of games where he got pulled under 80 pitches due to performance and even in his worst games they still left him on average between 90 and 100 pitches in those starts.

He had 13 quality starts last year and gave up 4 or fewer runs in 23 of his starts.   Even if he's as bad overall in 2022 as he was in 2021 if he can do similar I think the Orioles consider a worthwhile signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, interloper said:

But even in the good times the Orioles haven't been able to sign SPs.

I'm not going back right now to see how we acquired Kevin Brown, Scott Erickson, Jimmy Key and David Wells, and I know the financials are different now than they used to be, but we do have a history of getting big time pitchers into Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

The premise seems to be that you have to choose between pitchers who are healthy and pitchers that are good.  But I’ve heard that it is possible for a pitcher to be both.   

Challenge: Find me a pitcher who pitched in the majors for a long time and was never hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think at $5 million he's an insurance policy that can go to the pen if need be. I'd rather not go into spring training with him penciled into the rotation. But I also don't want Trevor Rogers penciled in either.  He also could be a bridge until Bradish is ready.
    • So to all of you saying you would bring him back…. GRod, Eflin, Kremer, Felix, DC, Webb, Soto, Dominguez, Akin and Cano That leaves room for 3 more pitchers and this doesn’t include McDermott, Rogers or Povich. 3 spots left, 1 high end reliever and 2 starters. Which of those 3 spots do you want him at or, who do you take off the above list and keep Suarez over?
    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...