Jump to content

MacPhail: Savior or not?


TJ Wrangler

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 205
  • Created
  • Last Reply
EXACTLY! And if the point has been reached where it's gone past that point, you really feel like they should keep upping their bid?? That's what you seem to be saying when you say if they let $X stand in their way, MacPhail should be fired.

Just because AM thinks it has reached that point, doesn't mean PA agrees...In other words, PA is likely to say, I am going to allow more money spent on payroll than Andy thinks.

I will tell you what...if the numbers we are hearing are accurate, it would be a joke for us not to have the highest offer out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him interviewed on MASN. He came off as someone who really understood baseball and what was necessary for rebuilding. Maybe what he was saying was common sense, but there have been a lot of GMs without it.

And IIRC, a deal for Bedard was basically done in December, but MacPhail dragged it out to get Butler. The trade would have still been great in December. So that's an example of not going slow to cover his weaknesses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because AM thinks it has reached that point, doesn't mean PA agrees...In other words, PA is likely to say, I am going to allow more money spent on payroll than Andy thinks.

Fair enough, but don't you think it would be a dysfunctional relationship between ownership and the GM that would not serve us well if PA wasn't communicating that that whatever additional monies are needed to sign Teix won't count against his budget? If Angelos was saying that to Andy, then I would find it hard to believe that Andy would prefer to walk away. So for that to be true we're screwed again with a dysfunctional owner/gm dynamic. One that will make it hard to ever get to the point where the organization is well run enough to put a consistent winner on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, but don't you think it would be a dysfunctional relationship between ownership and the GM that would not serve us well if PA wasn't communicating that that whatever additional monies are needed to sign Teix won't count against his budget? If Angelos was saying that to Andy, then I would find it hard to believe that Andy would prefer to walk away. So for that to be true we're screwed again with a dysfunctional owner/gm dynamic. One that will make it hard to ever get to the point where the organization is well run enough to put a consistent winner on the field.

Well, i would rather be screwed with Tex on the team than without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what? Ultimately there is always some team that believes a player is worth more money than any other team...That is why the player signs.

If Boston decides not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

If the Angels decide not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

If the Nationals decide not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

How about the Yankees?

If it's a bad decision to stop bidding at 8/170, how about 8/174? Heck, that's only $500,000 more per season. You can't buy anything worthwhile for $500,000 per year for 8 years anymore, anyway. Right?

So, if Boston decides not to go to 8/174, will that be a bad decision?

How about the Angels? How about the Nationals? How about the Yankees?

If it's a bad decision to stop at 8/174, why not 8/178? Heck, that's only $500,000 more per season. You can't buy anything worthwhile for $500,000 per year for 8 years anymore, anyway. Right? ... But wait, that's $1m per year more than 8/170. Oh well, you can't buy anything for $1m per year for 8 years anymore, anyway.

What about 8/182 or 8/186 or 8/190? It's not that much more money, right?

I don't know what the magic number is that's too much. Although my posts lately don't reflect it, I do hope we sign Teixeira. Heck, I'm a Mt. St. Joe grad. Bring back Teixeira and Floyd, and give O'Connor a shot when the Nationals give up on him, too.

But back to the point of the thread, I am not going to judge MacPhail on where Teixeira lands. And I don't think this whole off-season will tell us much. I'll judge him a few years from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him interviewed on MASN. He came off as someone who really understood baseball and what was necessary for rebuilding. Maybe what he was saying was common sense, but there have been a lot of GMs without it.

And IIRC, a deal for Bedard was basically done in December, but MacPhail dragged it out to get Butler. The trade would have still been great in December. So that's an example of not going slow to cover his weaknesses.

Just want to say that things could be a lot different when he's not talking to a national audience. Can he walk the walk instead of talking the talk? These remain to be seen.

Great point in the second part, but imagine what could have been if we could have gotten Butler in 2-3 weeks, not 2 months. Maybe we could have found a better deal for Roberts or finished a Markakis extension. Maybe we'd be better off in our rebuild if that were the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Boston decides not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

If the Angels decide not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

If the Nationals decide not to go to 8/170, will that be a bad decision?

How about the Yankees?

If it's a bad decision to stop bidding at 8/170, how about 8/174. Heck, that's only $500,000 more per season. You can't buy anything worthwhile for $500,000 per year for 8 years anymore, anyway. Right?

So, if Boston decides not to go to 8/174, will that be a bad decision?

How about the Angels? How about the Nationals? How about the Yankees?

If it's a bad decision to stop at 8/174, why not 8/178. Heck, that's only $500,000 more per season. You can't buy anything worthwhile for $500,000 per year for 8 years anymore, anyway. Right? ... But wait, that's $1m per year more than 8/170. Oh well, you can't buy anything for $1m per year for 8 years anymore, anyway.

What about 8/182 or 8/186 or 8/190? It's not that much more money, right?

I don't know what the magic number is that's too much. Although my posts lately don't reflect it, I do hope we sign Teixeira. Heck, I'm a Mt. St. Joe grad. Bring back Teixeira and Floyd, and give O'Connor a shot when the Nationals give up on him, too.

But back to the point of the thread, I am not going to judge MacPhail on where Teixeira lands. And I don't think this whole off-season will tell us much. I'll judge him a few years from now.

Personally, I think it is foolish to compare the reasons and situations of other teams to those of the Orioles, especially in regards to Tex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, i would rather be screwed with Tex on the team than without him.

Fair enough... I'd like to believe that either AM will be fully on board with acquiring Teix because Angelos ups the budget to help absorb an inflated contract or that AM convinces Angelos that we're better off walking away. I really hope it doesn't come down to being screwed with or without Teix.

I know you believe that Teix's localness will have a huge impact outside of his performance on the field which I am not so sure of (other than a short term bum). I think it's a dangerous approach to become so tied up in any one player that you throw fiscal responsibility completely out the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, your username isn't one we see here a whole lot. I'm not familiar with your posts.

Long time lurker. When I look for insider info, I usually look for Belkfast, Big Bird, Sonny, and Peace. I guess I'll have to add Lier to my list now. For clarification is it pronounced "Leer" or "Lier" with a long "I" sound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't find the OP really offensive. I just find it as one persons opinion, and nothing more. There is no evidence to support the fact that he has no baseball acumen. There is evidence to support that he does. Regardless of whether anyone thinks he's the right person for this job, or is qualified, this team is now heading in the right direction with a solid foundation on the farm and AM has done just about what could be expected.

Of course, the roto baseball wizards will not be happy because he hasn't traded Roberts, or Huff (despite reports at the deadline that it was odd that no team was interested in Huff). I'd really love to give the team to someone on this board who is smarter than AM, and let a camera follow them around for 3 years while they try to be a GM and find that its much more difficult to deal in real millions of dollars than it is to con Joe Shmoe out of Albert Pujols on Yahoo Fantasy Baseball.

I'd particularly love the episode of where our new GM was huddled in fetal position in the corner of his office crying once a week, because its much easier to read about Billy Beane, than be Billy Beane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long time lurker. When I look for insider info, I usually look for Belkfast, Big Bird, Sonny, and Peace. I guess I'll have to add Lier to my list now. For clarification is it pronounced "Leer" or "Lier" with a long "I" sound?

Its a play on the words liar and exaggerate. Don't put me in the same league as those guys. I simply have a source outside of the organization that is in contact with the front office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just want to say that things could be a lot different when he's not talking to a national audience. Can he walk the walk instead of talking the talk? These remain to be seen.

Great point in the second part, but imagine what could have been if we could have gotten Butler in 2-3 weeks, not 2 months. Maybe we could have found a better deal for Roberts or finished a Markakis extension. Maybe we'd be better off in our rebuild if that were the case.

All indications from AM's post trade interviews are that Bavasi thought it was a 3 for 1 deal for several months and didn't cave in to a 5 for 1 until shortly before it got done. I think this was a big sticking point between AM and Bavasi, and AM waited him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I do disagree. And everyone hated it in the game thread. What's changed? If Cano or Coulombe imploded this board is going nuts this morning. Just because the Reds couldn't hit the broad side of the barn yesterday doesn't suddenly make it any less stupid of a decision.
    • Actually I had set minimum PA to 90. If you set to Qualified (~75 PAs), then he is tied for 100th best wRC+ in AAA. 
    • Suarez can back up Means and the rest of the bullpen is rested. Maybe you disagree but breathtaking stupidity is over the top. 
    • I feel like the whole pity party for Norby is a bit much. He’s 23 and not a top 100 prospect in any of the major lists. He’s a subpar fielder limited to 2B and LF. He’s tied for 88th best hitter in AAA with a 108 wRC+. He has a 32% strikeout rate and bad Statcast peripherals.  The Banner throws around comments about how Norby would be starting for most other teams, but I don’t think that’s true. There’s maybe a couple teams where he might be considered for a chance to start. He doesn’t need to be added to the 40 man until end of year. I don’t think the Orioles would hesitate to trade him for reasonable value, but we need to find a taker. If we can’t get back someone that could be a difference maker in the bullpen, then he might be worth more to us as depth.   The narrative around how Norby is tragically and unfairly blocked in AAA from sure-fire MLB success due to Elias slow playing prospects and hoarding is completely overblown IMO.
    • Well we'll see how it plays out in the next two games. If he needs Cano, Coulombe, and Kimbrel again today, they will be unavailable in game 3 and Hyde will have nobody but himself to blame for that. 
    • Haha, yeah we would be 162-0 without him. Not just the best record in AL for past 200 games.
    • Naw man, Hyde's a total f@#!ing idiot and @dystopiais the only one who sees him for the fraud that he truly is.  Truly competent managers make late-game decisions based on 'what-if' worst-case scenarios for the following day's game in early May of the regular season.  Complete imbecile, that Hyde.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...