Jump to content

Poll: What’s your view of the Mancini trade?


Frobby

What’s your view of the Mancini trade  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your view of the Mancini trade?

    • Don’t like it - I didn’t want to trade him
    • Don’t like it - the return wasn’t enough
    • OK with it -we needed to get what we could even if a little disappointed with the return
    • Like it - very solid return for Mancini
    • Love it - really surprised we got that much for Mancini

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/06/22 at 16:38

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, DJHJR86 said:

He's a 30 year old DH who has a negative dWAR and has only had two seasons where he was above starter level WAR with a career .1 WPA.  

Negative dWAR is irrelevant.  An average defensive 1B or a DH has negative dWAR.   That just comes with the assigned role.  It’s all about how you hit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Negative dWAR is irrelevant.  An average defensive 1B or a DH has negative dWAR.   That just comes with the assigned role.  It’s all about how you hit.  

He still has only had 2 seasons with above starting level oWAR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DJHJR86 said:

He still has only had 2 seasons with above starting level oWAR

True, but he probably will this year.  Look, he’s a solid hitter and a good clubhouse guy.   Is he a star?   No, but nobody said he was.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

Obviously this topic is discussed elsewhere but I thought a poll would be a good way to crystallize posters’ reactions.   What say you?

Good poll. I don’t really know how to answer it because my feelings about the trade are colored by the fact that I had to try to explain it to my young son who was crying upon learning the news and saying “I just want to want to watch Trey Mancini play.” I’d probably say I didn’t want to trade him for that reason, but I also get it, accept it, and am not disappointed in what they did (in contrast with the Lopez trade).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Look, he’s a solid hitter and a good clubhouse guy.   Is he a star?   No, but nobody said he was.  

He was a great guy who handled adversity well, but his production is not going to be hard to replace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love the return.

Love that Mancini goes to a contender (for his sake)

Love that this opens up at bats for Vavra and Stowers

Love that the Orioles helped a team that has a shot to knock off the Yankees.

Love that Yankees fans were whining about Boston and Baltimore trying to sabotage their World Series hopes by sending good players to the Astros.

Edited by bluedog
  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I would be OK with this and it’s what Hyde was doing with Kimbrel in a way too. We’ve got guys that can match up, let’s try to take advantage. 
    • A 90 win season with Grayson missing at least 10 starts, Means and Bradish missing at least 20 each.  Throw in Tyler Wells missing most of the season and other injuries I think this team and its management has done well.  If just a little more healthy they could have had back to back 100 win seasons.  I am glad we have Mike Elias and Brandon Hyde leading this team.  
    • Some interesting things of note from https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2023/Sabermetrics-101-Understanding-the-Calculation-of-WAR. I pulled out the relevant areas: Fangraphs allocates 570 WAR for position players and 430 WAR for pitchers, while Baseball-Reference allocates 590 WAR for position players and 410 WAR for pitchers The major difference between fWAR and bWAR comes from the measurement of fielding runs, which is the defensive output a player provides. Fangraphs uses a statistic called Ultimate Zone Rating (UZR), while Baseball-Reference uses a statistics called Defensive Runs Saved (DRS). The differences in these stats can lead to drastically different calculations in WAR for some position players. UZR takes into account 3 years of players’ data as well as MLB data to determine these percentages, whereas DRS uses essentially 1 year of data. Therefore, some rookies will have drastically different UZR and DRS stats. As opposed to positional players, Fangraphs and Baseball-Reference take drastically different steps in calculating the WAR of pitchers. It does not follow the formula for position players but does try to calculate the “wins” that a pitcher gives to their team. Instead, they use a “base” statistic to help calculate WAR. Fangraphs uses FIP, or fielding independent pitching, as its base for calculating pitchers' WAR, whereas Baseball-Reference focuses on Runs Allowed per 9 innings (RA9) for its base I think the main takeaway for Gil, bWAR likes him more than FanGraphs probably because FG aims to take the defensive element out of the calculation by centering on FIP. And if we look at FIP, his is close to 4. But Baseball Reference is using RA9 which does have a defensive element inherently calculated. As for Cowser, I reckon FG likes him more than BBRef particularly on the defensive metric side of things. Maybe BBRef is harsher on the DRS side than FG is on the UZR side. To me, I like FG for pitchers far more than BBRef. For position players, I’d give the nod to FG but mainly because I think DRS can have some wide swings where UZR has a tendency to be more centered.
    • Win game 1, Kremer/Suarez game 2, win game 2, Eflin game 1 ALDS? Win game 1, Kremer/Suraez game 2, lose game 2, Eflin game 3? Lose game 1, Eflin game 2?
    • The win tonight in game 161 allowed the 2023-24 Orioles to reach 191 wins, tied with the 1964-65 and 1965-66 teams for the 7th most wins in consecutive seasons.  With a win tomorrow, they could move up to a tie for 5th. Tonight’s win also gave the O’s 275 wins over the last 3 seasons, tied for 11th with the 1975-77 and 1976-78 O’s.  They could move into a tie for 10th with a win tomorrow.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...