Jump to content

Kyle Stowers called up


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, interloper said:

It took Adley a month to start hitting. I'm just thrilled Stowers is here. What's even funnier is the people who think Gunnar is going to come right up and carry this team into the postseason. The odds that Gunnar looks offensively competent before the end of September are extremely low. I'll be thrilled when they call him up and anything cool he does will be exciting, but it's a move looking towards next year more than it is this year. 

At least - that should absolutely be our expectation. 

I think “extremely low” is an exaggeration.  There are plenty of rookies who get off to good starts.   Did Terrin Vavra look “offensively competent” his first week on the job?   I’d say yes.   It just isn’t guaranteed.  The other factor here is, if he’s taking at bats that otherwise would go to Odor, he doesn’t need to be Rogers Hornsby to be an upgrade.   I’d certainly bet on Henderson topping a .267 OBP this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think “extremely low” is an exaggeration.  There are plenty of rookies who get off to good starts.   Did Terrin Vavra look “offensively competent” his first week on the job?   I’d say yes.   It just isn’t guaranteed.  The other factor here is, if he’s taking at bats that otherwise would go to Odor, he doesn’t need to be Rogers Hornsby to be an upgrade.   I’d certainly bet on Henderson topping a .267 OBP this year.

I loved what Vavra did, but it's such a small sample that you can absolutely chalk it up to luck. I don't, necessarily, to be clear. But you could. Which is why I don't like using Vavra as a comparison. 

We agree re: Gunnar being an upgrade basically no matter what he does. Which is great! I just don't expect him to blow our socks off just yet. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, interloper said:

I loved what Vavra did, but it's such a small sample that you can absolutely chalk it up to luck. I don't, necessarily, to be clear. But you could. Which is why I don't like using Vavra as a comparison. 

We agree re: Gunnar being an upgrade basically no matter what he does. Which is great! I just don't expect him to blow our socks off just yet. 

To be clear, I don’t either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've seen Adley and Stowers both struggle at first when they were called up. Now is Stowers shrugging that off as he adjusts to MLB pitching? I hope so. It's one of the reasons why I think we should bring up Gunnar and anyone else that you might want to play a significant role next season. Get their feet wet now and let them start looking at MLB pitching. Start the adjustment phase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, casadeozo said:

Who is a ML comp for Stowers?

My crude guess last year was a Ryan Braun type but maybe thats way too generous?

Someone in the Miguel Sano, Chris Carter, Steven Souza, Mark Reynolds, Chris Davis, Mark Bellhorn, Ian Happ, Patrick Wisdom, Kyle Schwarber, Mike Zunino continuum.

Ryan Braun hit .296 and never struck out 130 times in a season.  Stowers struck out 171 times between A+ and AAA last year. I'll be quite surprised if Stowers ever hits .296 in a single season, much less his career.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Someone in the Miguel Sano, Chris Carter, Steven Souza, Mark Reynolds, Chris Davis, Mark Bellhorn, Ian Happ, Patrick Wisdon, Kyle Schwarber, Mike Zunino continuum.

Ryan Braun hit .296 and never struck out 130 times in a season.  Stowers struck out 171 times between A+ and AAA last year. I'll be quite surprised if Stowers ever hits .296 in a single season, much less his career.

Luke Scott is a comp that has been thrown around by many on here and I think that's a pretty strong one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...