Jump to content

Tom Verducci: How the Orioles Became the Most Unlikely Playoff Contender in MLB History


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

You can't have it both ways.  You can't expect every word to be a literally true prediction of the future, but then expect him to say that absolutely we're going to beat out 29 other teams trying to sign big talent.  They are going to try, and it's a near certainty that some of their targets really want to play somewhere else and they won't get them.

Of course…but we have an ownership group where their level of trying tends to be different than other ownership groups.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

This is an educated guess so take it with a grain of salt. I think they keep Lyles. Stability in a rotation with a bunch of young guys is important. I think they trade for a #1 or 2 starter. I also think there is a good possibility they add either a First Baseman and Outfielder in Free Agency.

So if they keep Lyles, that puts them in the 50ishM range.

At first base, you have Josh Bell, Jose Abreu and Mancini.

Outside of Judge, who we won’t and shouldn’t even attempt to sign, the OF list is even worse than that.

I do think we need to overhaul the offense somewhat but again, some of that is coming from our system.

But I would like to see them add one more above average bat and 2 top end starters.  But that doesn’t mean it will cost a lot in terms of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So if they keep Lyles, that puts them in the 50ishM range.

At first base, you have Josh Bell, Jose Abreu and Mancini.

Outside of Judge, who we won’t and shouldn’t even attempt to sign, the OF list is even worse than that.

I do think we need to overhaul the offense somewhat but again, some of that is coming from our system.

But I would like to see them add one more above average bat and 2 top end starters.  But that doesn’t mean it will cost a lot in terms of money.

Bell does walk a good bit. Switch hitter. His defense at 1B by the metrics has improved. Turned 30 in August. Can’t imagine he gets a super long deal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Bell does walk a good bit. Switch hitter. His defense at 1B by the metrics has improved. Turned 30 in August. Can’t imagine he gets a super long deal.  

Bell could be a good option on a 1-2 year deal if they decide to trade Mountcastle for pitching. Taking most of swings from the left side might appeal to Elias over the other options. And a better career hitter than Mancini. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Bell does walk a good bit. Switch hitter. His defense at 1B by the metrics has improved. Turned 30 in August. Can’t imagine he gets a super long deal.  

Negatives for Bell: He's a 2-3 win player entering his 30s, so anything more than a 2-3 year deal for moderate salary is kind of meh. His value has been solid when he hits .280-300, not so much when he doesn't. 

Positives: I can finally get rid of the Josh Bell negative connotations from associating the name with our failed third baseman of the future from the George Sherrill deal.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Negatives for Bell: He's a 2-3 win player entering his 30s, so anything more than a 2-3 year deal for moderate salary is kind of meh. His value has been solid when he hits .280-300, not so much when he doesn't. 

Positives: I can finally get rid of the Josh Bell negative connotations from associating the name with our failed third baseman of the future from the George Sherrill deal.

He definitely has his flaws. I think they need to do something outside of what they have to tweak things. Not some type of an overhaul. Can’t assume Gunnar is going to be a star right away. They need another significant bat.  
 

I think how Elias and the FO view Stowers and Westburg will play a major role this off-season and beyond. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

I wouldn't bet the Farm they will spend wildly this off season. I think it will be a trade or two and above average spending. Payroll probably around 90 to 100 million.

I would bet the farm they won’t spend “wildly” this offseason.  They don’t need to.  Just a few significant acquisitions in areas of need.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Negatives for Bell: He's a 2-3 win player entering his 30s, so anything more than a 2-3 year deal for moderate salary is kind of meh. His value has been solid when he hits .280-300, not so much when he doesn't. 

Positives: I can finally get rid of the Josh Bell negative connotations from associating the name with our failed third baseman of the future from the George Sherrill deal.

Or they could sign him, he sucks, and the connotations continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I would bet the farm they won’t spend “wildly” this offseason.  They don’t need to.  Just a few significant acquisitions in areas of need.   

Pitching is expensive. As much as I like Grayson and DL. I wouldn't depend on them yet. Means is a wildcard depending on how he comes back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Elias said was: Our plan for this offseason has always been to significantly escalate the payroll,” GM Mike Elias said .  “I think a lot of that’s going to come through our own guys going into arbitration, but also we plan to explore free agency much more aggressively.  We plan to maybe make some buy trades for some guys that are either on contracts or kind of in the tail-end of their arbitration.”  

I remembered it as "most" when he actually said "a lot" ,, my bad. Either way I think that caps how much he can spend around $20 M if SG's estimates of Arb costs are right. Coupled with pre-Arb and fixed costs (Davis etc) we are in the $40 M range so an increase to $60 M range. I suppose if we keep Lyles, he could be seen as part of the base so we could get to $70 M range. Either way Elias had enough qualifier words in there to cover frustrated expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

I would bet the farm they won’t spend “wildly” this offseason.  They don’t need to.  Just a few significant acquisitions in areas of need.   

Agreed.  My hopeful fandom wants one significant signing (likely TOR or MOO) and some filling of holes here/there.  The jaded cynic from the last few years sees a couple of Lyles types and some hole filling. 

I'm hanging my O's hat on Elias saying something to the effect of making different types of decisions going forward and rocking the orange sunglasses!  Anyone else pre-order their O's Verlander jersey? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 5:32 PM, spiritof66 said:

Then you might not know that the other two prominent syndicates in the late 1890s were Pittsburg/Louisville (I'm pretty sure Pittsburg had no "h" then) and Brooklyn/Baltimore. (New York/Cincinnati was another, sort of.)

With seven (I think that's right) future Hall of Famers, the Orioles finished first or second five times in the National League during the 1890s, including three consecutive pennants from '94 through '96. After the 1898 season, most of the team's stars wound up in Brooklyn. (A couple more followed a year later.) In 1899, with a change in nicknames from Bridegrooms to Superbas, Brooklyn won the pennant while setting a record for wins with a 101-47 mark, an improvement of 45.5 games from their tenth-place finish the season before.

The Louisville-Pittsburg story is more complicated, but after Louisville was eliminated from the National League, as discussed below, most of its best players, including Honus Wagner, ended up with the Pirates, who won four pennants in the following decade.  

The three teams victimized by syndicate baseball were eliminated when the NL lopped off four teams after the 1899 season. Baltimore and Cleveland (and the fourth eliminated team, Washington) got franchises in the American League. Louisville got to make bats.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/today-in-1899-the-brooklyn-superbas-were-born/

ttps://sabr.org/journal/article/barney-dreyfuss-buys-pittsburgh/

Thank you for taking the time to write this synopsis up!!!  I enjoy learning about baseball history.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...