Jump to content

SP Trade Targets Compared


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, DrinkinWithFermi said:

I'm just saying, Holliday is the reigning first overall draft pick and a legitimate 5 tool prospect at a premium position. He should be viewed as a core building block until he proves that he isn't.

I’m not advocating for trading him. I’m indifferent ultimately, but my whole point was leaning towards not trading anyone. That list was just infield depth in the system that you could potentially trade from without creating a position of need. Holliday would be at the top of the list in value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't often call Jim Bowden the winning pundit, but scanning those Bleacher Report and The Athletic links think Bowden's guesses are closer to the mark.     The AAV's will wobble, but a lot of the game at this level of established pitcher going for one of their career's centerpiece contracts is the YEARS.     

The World Series has also taught me Zach Eflin as another medium guy out there who I believe presents better $$$/WAR than Lyles' expensive option, though maybe not the 1-year term.

5 years - Rodon

4 years - Eovaldi, Bassitt, Taillon

3 years - Senga, Eflin, Verlander

2 years - Ty. Anderson, M. Perez, deGrom

1 year - Kershaw    (he's basically on the Red Sox Tim Wakefield lifetime 1-year option lifestyle unless he feels like pitching for TEX)

I feel Fangraphs crowdsourcers' results coming in the next week or two get a wisdom of crowds edge on Bowden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On these two lists the one that seem to fit the O's are:

2/34 for Abreu

And whoever Holt likes out of:

2/24 for Anderson (Looks like a Means clone)

Clevinger, Syndergaard, Taillon, Wacha, Walker

All are probably better than Lyles IMO.

I don't see the O's going more that 2 years plus an option.

 

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Funny how they have deGrom and Verlander as a fit for the O's but not someone like Bassitt.

I would also love to see statistical evidence showing how the style of shift being outlawed cost Rizzo 30+ points in batting average.

I thought that was odd too.  We're in on the huge names, deGrom, Verlander, Bogarts, Turner, but not the mid-tier guys like Bassit, Eovaldi, Anderson, Perez

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MarCakes21 said:

I thought that was odd too.  We're in on the huge names, deGrom, Verlander, Bogarts, Turner, but not the mid-tier guys like Bassit, Eovaldi, Anderson, Perez

The reason I can see that is Elias doesn't want to give long term contracts to pitchers.  What long term contracts has Houston given to pitchers?  They could have locked up Verlander for several years when he first came over.  Lucky for them, Verlander has been happy to go a year or 2 at a time.  It is likely that Elias is thinking about the total expenditure for a pitcher whether it is say $150 mill over 3, 4, 5 or 6 years.  I don't see Elias signing DeGrom or Verlander, but I could see him trying to sign a second tier pitcher to a Correa/Bauer type deal.  For example, signing Bassit to a 2 year/$50 mill deal, instead of a 4 year/$80 mill deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The reason I can see that is Elias doesn't want to give long term contracts to pitchers.  What long term contracts has Houston given to pitchers?  They could have locked up Verlander for several years when he first came over.  Lucky for them, Verlander has been happy to go a year or 2 at a time.  It is likely that Elias is thinking about the total expenditure for a pitcher whether it is say $150 mill over 3, 4, 5 or 6 years.  I don't see Elias signing DeGrom or Verlander, but I could see him trying to sign a second tier pitcher to a Correa/Bauer type deal.  For example, signing Bassit to a 2 year/$50 mill deal, instead of a 4 year/$80 mill deal. 

What position players has he signed to a long term deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Switching to the other end of the BTV median values, here are some underwater SP who might be effectively free talent-wise if an acquiring Club took on enough of their balance owed.     

-50, Jose Berrios and Robbie Ray      (mostly just trolling rivals to be the AL's future sixth-best team here)

-35, Madison Bumgarner

-30, Eduardo Rodriguez, Kyle Freeland and Chris Sale

-20, Yusei Kikuchi and Hyun-Jin Ryu

-15, Marco Gonzales

-10, Marcus Stroman and Kyle Hendricks

-5, Miles Mikolas and Kenta Maeda

The '22 Diamondbacks had a strong year, kind of the Orioles of the National League.    Honestly not sure what lane for '23 their Owner and GM will come up with.

Not listed is Chris Flexen, who for SEA is in a Lyles-similar position, except with a much smaller option.    To the extent 5th starter roles barely exist anymore and they have Castillo-Ray-Gilbert-Kirby in the lead dog spots, easy to imagine Dipoto hoping to do something different with the Gonzales (and Flexen if exercised) commitments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Switching to the other end of the BTV median values, here are some underwater SP who might be effectively free talent-wise if an acquiring Club took on enough of their balance owed.     

-50, Jose Berrios and Robbie Ray      (mostly just trolling rivals to be the AL's future sixth-best team here)

-35, Madison Bumgarner

-30, Eduardo Rodriguez, Kyle Freeland and Chris Sale

-20, Yusei Kikuchi and Hyun-Jin Ryu

-15, Marco Gonzales

-10, Marcus Stroman and Kyle Hendricks

-5, Miles Mikolas and Kenta Maeda

The '22 Diamondbacks had a strong year, kind of the Orioles of the National League.    Honestly not sure what lane for '23 their Owner and GM will come up with.

Not listed is Chris Flexen, who for SEA is in a Lyles-similar position, except with a much smaller option.    To the extent 5th starter roles barely exist anymore and they have Castillo-Ray-Gilbert-Kirby in the lead dog spots, easy to imagine Dipoto hoping to do something different with the Gonzales (and Flexen if exercised) commitments.

I doubt that Robbie Ray would have any interest in playing under Brandon Hyde lol.

And I would pass on Berrios and Kikuchi, they didn't impress me this season although Berrios definitely got better as the season went on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Switching to the other end of the BTV median values, here are some underwater SP who might be effectively free talent-wise if an acquiring Club took on enough of their balance owed.     

-50, Jose Berrios and Robbie Ray      (mostly just trolling rivals to be the AL's future sixth-best team here)

-35, Madison Bumgarner

-30, Eduardo Rodriguez, Kyle Freeland and Chris Sale

-20, Yusei Kikuchi and Hyun-Jin Ryu

-15, Marco Gonzales

-10, Marcus Stroman and Kyle Hendricks

-5, Miles Mikolas and Kenta Maeda

The '22 Diamondbacks had a strong year, kind of the Orioles of the National League.    Honestly not sure what lane for '23 their Owner and GM will come up with.

Not listed is Chris Flexen, who for SEA is in a Lyles-similar position, except with a much smaller option.    To the extent 5th starter roles barely exist anymore and they have Castillo-Ray-Gilbert-Kirby in the lead dog spots, easy to imagine Dipoto hoping to do something different with the Gonzales (and Flexen if exercised) commitments.

I’d take a shot at Stroman 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Baltimore and DC surrounding population around 9 million. NYC around 24 million.
    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...