Jump to content

The warning signs are there for the reading


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Just now, owknows said:

Once again... it's like a scene from Moneyball.

 

Old Guys... Plaid Pants...  Making pronouncements about how teams HAVE to be run... cuz that's how we did it before... 

You do know that Moneyball team had Tejada and the big three pitchers.

All that stuff in Moneyball was filling out the roster stuff.  They also traded away Carlos Pena which was kinda questionable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty disheartening.  3/63 is on the expensive side for a team in the last stages of rebuilding, especially for a 34 year-old pitcher, but I thought Bassitt was a good fit and the O's could have absorbed that contract without too much risk.

I'm a little uncomfortable looking for omens in situations like this especially if it concerns betrayals of trust like concluding that the Angeloses have pulled the rug out from under Mike Elias after promising him the moon etc., etc...

Elias has a good group of people surrounding him.  If they start leaving for "promotions" in other organizations, then I'll be a lot more sympathetic to the Game of Thrones narrative in regard to the Angelos family.  But until there's a clearer understanding of the now multiple disappointments on the FA front I'm going to withhold judgement until after the 2023 trade deadline.  I think that's a reasonably patient position for a fan to take, but it sure is getting a hell of a lot more difficult at this point.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

You do know that Moneyball team had Tejada and the big three pitchers.

All that stuff in Moneyball was filling out the roster stuff.  They also traded away Carlos Pena which was kinda questionable.

I thought it was fairly obvious that I referenced Moneyball as an example of resistance to new thinking.

Not as an example of running a team.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The marlins when they trade Lopez are going to get a hefty haul. His demand is skyrocketing with all these long lofty contracts. All your small & mid market teams will all be competing for his services driving up the price because they refuse or can't compete with the larger market clubs in free agency, but at the end  of the day he'll get traded to the  yankees or the dodgers of the world  because they will be more willing to part with their best prospects because their  not as dependent on them as say the orioles.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, owknows said:

I thought it was fairly obvious that I referenced Moneyball as an example of resistance to new thinking.

Not as an example of running a team.

Those guys are already gone.

They've been put out to pasture.

You are suggesting doing something other teams are already doing and suggesting it's some sea change.

I'm sure the Rays would prefer to not have to sign Zach Eflin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jrobb21613 said:

The marlins when they trade Lopez are going to get a hefty haul. His demand is skyrocketing with all these long lofty contracts. All your small & mid market teams will all be competing for his services driving up the price because they refuse or can't compete with the larger market clubs in free agency, but at the end  of the day he'll get traded to the  yankees or the dodgers of the world  because they will be more willing to part with their best prospects because their  not as dependent on them as say the orioles.

Yep. If we were serious about addressing our pitching needs via trade then we should have made a play for Lopez long before all the high end FA pitchers signed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

I guess where I'm at as an O's fan, is that I'm hoping that when Peter dies, that MLB forces the sale of the O's.  Then finally the O's will have an owner who has winning as his #1 goal instead of pocketing millions.

It's more likely to be the inheritance tax forcing the sale than MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

Do you think dollars not spent this year will be applied towards the team in the future or go to the owner’s pockets?

My prescription was to offer early extensions to emerging talent.

I also don't really understand the default position being that owners are evil if they don't spend unnecessary money.

If they continue to put a bad product on the field, I'll be right there with you.

But this same family spent ridiculous money to put a BAD product on the field.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You are suggesting doing something other teams are already doing and suggesting it's some sea change.

 

No. I'm not.

As we discussed earlier.. the Rays are closest to doing what I advocate... but they still do things I'd suggest they not do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I guess where I'm at as an O's fan, is that I'm hoping that when Peter dies, that MLB forces the sale of the O's.  Then finally the O's will have an owner who has winning as his #1 goal instead of pocketing millions.

It wouldn't surprise me if they didn't already have a buyer lined up frankly I'd be more surprised if they didn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, owknows said:

Gee, thanks

I suspect that if they make the playoffs every year without having multiple 250 million dollar players signed, their fans will love them all the more for it. I know I will.

You seem to be suggesting that you must either sign multiple big-contract FA's, or you're not "going for it"

I reject your false dichotomy.

 

That’s not what I am suggesting at all. I am expressing serious concern about the Orioles alienating the fans in the community/market.

I don’t want the team to be reckless and spend foolishly. But I do what them to spend when appropriate. IMO this offseason with the payroll being so low would have be wholly appropriate and would not have done long term harm or prevented us from resigning our homegrown stars.

We don’t have to take an extreme approach and I believe an absolutist position to team building is problematic. I feel like deciding not to participate in free agency (if indeed that is the franchise’s direction) will be just as bad as when we were refusing to participate in talent acquisition through the international market (in particular the Dominican Republic).

Lastly, we seem to be talking at or past one another at this point which really serves no purpose. I want the team to win a World Series by any means. If the budget/no free agent approach works, I will be as happy as anyone.

However, I am just very concerned about the organization willing to take the risk of alienating it’s fans when there appears to be a more pragmatic approach. Unless their primary goal is really to pocket profits with winning being secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...