Jump to content

Roch forgets about Maverick Handley


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

Maybe you guilted him into the story. 

Or, he ran out of other things to write about.  But in any event, I’m glad Handley has gotten a long stint in spring training and has gotten a lot out of it, it appears.  And, he’s looked pretty good out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Roch remembers about Maverick Handley:

https://www.masnsports.com/blog/handley

I've only been following the O's since they drafted 3 Cardinal in 2019.  It was pretty fun to see the 2022 9th rounder getting his AB yesterday in front of Handley.  With that being said and my limited history.  Roch seems to be a writer who may have been good at one point but now seems like a guy that is hanging on in a digital would trying to survive on clicks.  As such... he has to write about the low hanging fruit that any person could write about without much effort.  He does his 'mailbag' to be sarcastic and witty but that grows tiresome if I can even finish reading those...

As for this 'interview' with Handley, I read the interview and thought it sounded like Maverick was on the phone with his mother or father trying to stay positive about his situation.  Don't say anything negative and keep a positive mindset.  Hoping for an injury is bad karma.   It reminded me of when Melewski interviewed Cody Roberts after Roberts became the sacrificial Travel Squad catcher... Roberts almost ran out of every thing he could say about sitting in a hotel and spinning it into a positive.   It is almost a real life version of Bull Durham when Crash Davis was giving Nuke LaLoosh veteran advice on his interviews, "Of course it's boring!  That's the point.  Write it down.  I just want to give it my best shot and the good Lord willing things will work out."

I also read 'like' like 11 times.  Like that is excessive.  Like Handley had to think about dumbing down his answers to not like overwhelm Roch.  

You can't really blame Roch though...  When the starters leave after the 5th or 6th inning he has to scurry down to get his interviews in with the future starters.  So he misses anything that happens after that.  Then he has to go write his story to publish as soon as the game is over by adding anything that he may have seen in the box score or on someone else's twitter feed.  Be the first to publish and get the clicks.

Reading Roch's writing is like watching gold mining shows... where miners are hoping to find some gold in old tailing piles hoping that have are the leftovers of someone else's hard work and they don't have to spend any real time or effort in the process... So I read him hoping that maybe Roch finds and reports on a nugget that someone missed.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, CHIP said:

I've only been following the O's since they drafted 3 Cardinal in 2019.  It was pretty fun to see the 2022 9th rounder getting his AB yesterday in front of Handley.  With that being said and my limited history.  Roch seems to be a writer who may have been good at one point but now seems like a guy that is hanging on in a digital would trying to survive on clicks.  As such... he has to write about the low hanging fruit that any person could write about without much effort.  He does his 'mailbag' to be sarcastic and witty but that grows tiresome if I can even finish reading those...

As for this 'interview' with Handley, I read the interview and thought it sounded like Maverick was on the phone with his mother or father trying to stay positive about his situation.  Don't say anything negative and keep a positive mindset.  Hoping for an injury is bad karma.   It reminded me of when Melewski interviewed Cody Roberts after Roberts became the sacrificial Travel Squad catcher... Roberts almost ran out of every thing he could say about sitting in a hotel and spinning it into a positive.   It is almost a real life version of Bull Durham when Crash Davis was giving Nuke LaLoosh veteran advice on his interviews, "Of course it's boring!  That's the point.  Write it down.  I just want to give it my best shot and the good Lord willing things will work out."

I also read 'like' like 11 times.  Like that is excessive.  Like Handley had to think about dumbing down his answers to not like overwhelm Roch.  

You can't really blame Roch though...  When the starters leave after the 5th or 6th inning he has to scurry down to get his interviews in with the future starters.  So he misses anything that happens after that.  Then he has to go write his story to publish as soon as the game is over by adding anything that he may have seen in the box score or on someone else's twitter feed.  Be the first to publish and get the clicks.

Reading Roch's writing is like watching gold mining shows... where miners are hoping to find some gold in old tailing piles hoping that have are the leftovers of someone else's hard work and they don't have to spend any real time or effort in the process... So I read him hoping that maybe Roch finds and reports on a nugget that someone missed.

Roch sold his soul to the Owners. I have a hard time calling him a journalist. He is basically a PR rep for the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Or the Williams sisters, but I doubt he'd mention girls.  
    • Possible? Sure. Yet, I'd be surprised by any trades in the divisions, unless it was considered a minor one.  I doubt Elias would want to see any of his prospects helping an AL East rival when he can get similar players elsewhere.
    • Tiger Woods, of course, standing as an excellent example of a guy who was precociously skilled at a sport at a very young age (because his dad made him play) but never quite got there as a pro. There’s some merit to what you’re referencing here. I would absolutely buy that his lifelong exposure to baseball is a significant factor in his success at a young age. But I think that type of thing is far more applicable when evaluating youth or high school, maybe college level players. At lower levels and younger ages, I suspect extreme advantages in experience, practice time, and hands-on coaching can absolutely give a less talented kid a leg up. However, I think there’s a ceiling for how far a ho-hum kid can go on the back of force-fed baseball obsession — and I’m pretty sure that ceiling is a lot lower than “excellent hitter at AAA at age 20.“ I think you have to have the goods to reach that level, no matter how much baseball your daddy exposed you to as a kid. Ceiling-wise, as I’ve said, I do think he’s probably lower than some of these absolute tool demons like Gunnar and Witt and Acuna. I would not trade Gunnar for him, for example. But lots of these guys I’ve compared him to as 2Bs (Cano, Utley, Altuve, Pedroia, Kinsler) were not super tooled-up guys, and they’re all among the 25-50 most valuable players of the last 25 years or so. I don’t know that you have to be a Greek god to be a perennial All-Star type player, at least at that particular position.  
    • Why do you want to elevate the opposing pitcher's pitch count?
    • I really hope that doesn't happen. Hyde said that the 6-man rotation was not going to be a permanent thing, nor should it with our schedule and our bullpen situation. The pen needs a long man. Suarez is a maybe to complete five innings. Suarez should be in the pen, not starting at Yankee Stadium.
    • If a team is not getting walks, they aren't elevating the opponent pitcher's pitch count. They are also having quicker innings and taxing their own pitchers.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...