Jump to content

Maybe Frazier can play


wildcard

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

I think we will find that Westburg doesn't have near the range of Mateo.  And that would hurt the pitchers.  I would rank the SS defensive as Mateo, Gunnar, Ortiz and then Westburg.

From the BA write up on Ortiz: “If Gunnar Henderson ends up at third base, it may be because Ortiz is an even better shortstop defensively.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

From the BA write up on Ortiz: “If Gunnar Henderson ends up at third base, it may be because Ortiz is an even better shortstop defensively.”

Depends on what you mean by better.   Ortiz is probably more sure handed and will make less errors.   But Gunnar probably has more range than Ortiz.   Range will be important next season with the infield rule changes.

But then again that is why I think there will be an evaluation in ST to see who can do what.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

And here we are in the offseason where it's so boring, we have to bring up a conversation that we had beaten the horse to a bloody pulp! :D

As the owner of this place, I say bravo @wildcard! :D

At the end of the day, we all hope he does well now regardless of how we feel about the deal.

Saying that, if Westburg and/or Ortiz tear it up in AAA for the first two months, the conversation will get quite loud once again. 

Regardless, I think everyone expects him to be a good defender. That was never in question.

In the OP I say: Maybe he can play depending on how much he has left.   I say that because Baseball Savant says he lost speed last season which could equate to range.

So I think Frazier being a "good defender" is in a "prove it" situation this spring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Depends on what you mean by better.   Ortiz is probably more sure handed and will make less errors.   But Gunnar probably has more range than Ortiz.   Range will be important next season with the infield rule changes.

But then again that is why I think there will be an evaluation in ST to see who can do what.

Why do you think Gunnar has more range than Ortiz at SS? Tony’s said the following about Ortiz:

Defensively, he’s easily the best defensive shortstop in the system who is major league ready with the glove. He has plus range, very good hands, turns the double play well, has great baseball instincts, and a solid average major league shortstop arm. 

In contrast, he said that Gunnar is more well-suited for 3rd (which I agree with, not that my opinion matters):

Defensively, he also made gains cutting down his errors at both shortstop and particularly at 3B where he started to get more playing time as he moved up the chain. He has good hands, solid quickness, and a strong accurate arm from both SS and 3B, but looks more well suited for 3B than SS. While he does have the current quickness to play shortstop, as he continues to gain weight and get bigger as he matures, third base will be where he ends up and should be a plus defensive 3B when it’s all said and done.

I’ve noticed Henderson look better on plays up the middle versus in the hole at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sydnor said:

Why do you think Gunnar has more range than Ortiz at SS? Tony’s said the following about Ortiz:

Defensively, he’s easily the best defensive shortstop in the system who is major league ready with the glove. He has plus range, very good hands, turns the double play well, has great baseball instincts, and a solid average major league shortstop arm. 

In contrast, he said that Gunnar is more well-suited for 3rd (which I agree with, not that my opinion matters):

Defensively, he also made gains cutting down his errors at both shortstop and particularly at 3B where he started to get more playing time as he moved up the chain. He has good hands, solid quickness, and a strong accurate arm from both SS and 3B, but looks more well suited for 3B than SS. While he does have the current quickness to play shortstop, as he continues to gain weight and get bigger as he matures, third base will be where he ends up and should be a plus defensive 3B when it’s all said and done.

I’ve noticed Henderson look better on plays up the middle versus in the hole at SS.

Gunnar is 6'2 and Ortiz is 5'11".  Potentially Gunnar makes longer strides.   

Comparing  SS range in the minors the best we have is Range Factor (RF). Gunnar's RF last year in the minors was 4.08 and his career RF is 4.09 at SS.   Ortiz  RF was 3.92 last year and his career RF is 3.80 at SS.

Ortiz is more sure handed than Gunnar.

I agree that over time Gunnar will probably slow down but for right now I don't think that is true.

So you ask why.  That is why.   But Tony is better at player evaluation than I am.   I don't take what Tony said to be direct comparison of the two.  If Tony values fielding percentage he could easily pick Ortiz  over Gunnar's range.

Edited by wildcard
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Gunnar is 6'2 and Ortiz is 5'11".  Potentially Gunnar makes longer strides.   

Comparing  SS range in the minors the best we have is Range Factor (RF). Gunnar's RF last year in the minors was 4.08 and his career RF is 4.09 at SS.   Ortiz  RF was 3.92 last year and his career RF is 3.80 at SS.

Ortiz is more sure handed than Gunnar.

I agree that over time Gunnar will probably slow down but for right now I don't think that is true.

So you ask why.  That is why.   But Tony is better at player evaluation than I am.   I don't take what Tony said to be direct comparison of the two.  If Tony values fielding percentage he could easily pick Ortiz  over Gunnar's range.

Range factor isn’t very reliable.  For anyone who gets BA, what grades did Gunnar get for glove and arm?  Ortiz was 60 and 55.   

I’ve just heard too many great things about Ortiz’s defense to believe Gunnar is the better defender at SS.  But I do believe Gunnar has the stronger arm and would be very good at SS if the O’s choose to put him there.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Range factor isn’t very reliable.  For anyone who gets BA, what grades did Gunnar get for glove and arm?  Ortiz was 60 and 55.   

I’ve just heard too many great things about Ortiz’s defense to believe Gunnar is the better defender at SS.  But I do believe Gunnar has the stronger arm and would be very good at SS if the O’s choose to put him there.  
 

What is better than Range Factor to compare minor league defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

Depends on what you mean by better.   Ortiz is probably more sure handed and will make less errors.   But Gunnar probably has more range than Ortiz.   Range will be important next season with the infield rule changes.

But then again that is why I think there will be an evaluation in ST to see who can do what.

Gunnar has a better arm.  Ortiz is the better overall defender.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, wildcard said:

In the OP I say: Maybe he can play depending on how much he has left.   I say that because Baseball Savant says he lost speed last season which could equate to range.

So I think Frazier being a "good defender" is in a "prove it" situation this spring.

I think everything about Frazier is prove it as well, but if there's one thing I expect is for his defense to still be above average. At the end of the day, "We shall see!"

Regardless, if Westburg is tearing up AAA and playing a decent 2B (where he should be getting most of his time this up coming season) the Frazier signing will still look questionable, especially for the dollar amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I think everything about Frazier is prove it as well, but if there's one thing I expect is for his defense to still be above average. At the end of the day, "We shall see!"

Regardless, if Westburg is tearing up AAA and playing a decent 2B (where he should be getting most of his time this up coming season) the Frazier signing will still look questionable, especially for the dollar amount. 

It just feeling like a contender is going to lose a 2B to injury and come knocking at the O's door.   And Elias will trade Frazier, who is on a one year contract, for a good prospect.   

Just another way for Elias to stack talent up in the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • We have the best inside the Mayo family source there is.  @Roy Firestone have you heard anything about an imminent Coby Mayo promotion?
    • I don't really want to see an all in trade given the risk involved with picking up any pitcher in the game right now. I want to see if veteran players on a big contract are an option now with Rubenstein. A player like Max Scherzer should be on the table as a means to add another viable starting pitcher. I have to think under Angelos a player like Scherzer would be too expensive and a nonstarter. I'd rather pay $$$ for some high priced veterans over giving up top prospects for one pitcher that you pray doesn't get a sore elbow. 
    • I’m not an actuary. That’s @Filmstudy realm. He’s a master at calculating odds. Here’s what I will say. I think (just my two cents) that Elias should be aiming to come away from the trade deadline with a starting pitcher who is a real difference maker. And hopefully a bullpen arm or two that have power/strikeout stuff (unlike all of our relievers currently not named Kimbrel). Elias should be trying to increase our odds as high as possible. I don’t know by what percent our odds will increase. But I do know that if we add a top of the rotation type pitcher to what we have, the odds of us likely being successful against ANY TEAM in the Fall will go up. This again is just my opinion (for whatever that is worth) but it sends the right message to the players that you are invested in truly trying to get this team over the line (World Series trophy). If the message that is sent to the players continues to be “one foot in and one foot out”. I’m not sure if that is a strong appeal to ultra competitors like Gunnar and Adley. People might say well who cares what the players think? But it is probably going to play a roll (what they think/how they feel) in whether or not they are willing to re-up here longterm. And I can’t envision a version of the Orioles that is as strong and as viable to maximizing the earnings/value of the franchise without them. I’ve said this before, but I attend a lot of games and I’m around town very often. I see all of the #2 and #35 shirts on people’s backs in the stadium and around the community. Lastly, I believe that it is very important that we do right for players like Stowers and Norby. I get and I’m sure they understand that there may not be a place for them on the Baltimore Orioles. But you can’t leave guys buried at AAA for years and never give them a chance, especially when we are talking about prime years. These guys only have so many years to make money by playing the game. If you can’t use them, send them elsewhere. I have never been a big believer that you get rewarded by treating people (and that is what all the players actually are) wrong.
    • Holliday isn’t being traded lol. And I highly doubt Mayo is traded. Basallo is expendable to me. We have Adley. 
    • Seems logical with the lefties coming up. It's time. Get him a taste before the AS break, temporarily option someone, then make a deal at the deadline to jettison someone like Urias. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...