Jump to content

Best lead off hitter?


mdterpsrule

Recommended Posts

With Rickey's introduction into the HOF, we got to hear ESPN glowingly talk about Henderson being the greatest lead off hitter of all time. But wasn't Ty Cobb a lead off hitter? I can't find concrete info, but most things I've seen classify him as the teams lead off hitter. I do know he batted fourth in the 1907 and 08 WS.

If he was I don't know how you could make an argument about how Rickey was better. Cobb leads in pretty much every statistical category except steals, and most of them aren't even close. Are the steals really that much to bump him over?

Anyone else in the argument? Pete Rose? Brady Anderson :)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henderson batted lead off over 98 percent of the time. A poster at the Houston Chronicle claims that Cobb batted lead off over 77 percent of the time. He also claims he found that info at B-R, but I haven't been able to locate it yet.

This was in response to an article which ranked the top 5 lead off hitters of all time. They ranked Henderson 2nd to Cobb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ichiro. I know he doesn't have the stats, and I don't believe he is the best lead-off hitter ever (Ty Cobb gets my vote), but the guy is amazing, and if he could have played in the US for his whole career, I think we might be including him in this discussion. Just wanted to throw the idea around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ichiro. I know he doesn't have the stats, and I don't believe he is the best lead-off hitter ever (Ty Cobb gets my vote), but the guy is amazing, and if he could have played in the US for his whole career, I think we might be including him in this discussion. Just wanted to throw the idea around.

How do his stats including Japan compare to Ricky's? I'd imagine the BA is better but Ricky has better power figures and SBs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eliminate night games, rigorous travel, Latino & African-American pitchers for starters, shrink the pitchers from 1979-2003 back to the average size of the pitchers when Cobb played, and I'm sure Rickey's numbers would be even more impressive than they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eliminate night games, rigorous travel, Latino & African-American pitchers for starters, shrink the pitchers from 1979-2003 back to the average size of the pitchers when Cobb played, and I'm sure Rickey's numbers would be even more impressive than they are.

I have a hard time believing that Ty Cobb had an easier time traveling than Rickey Henderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eliminate night games, rigorous travel, Latino & African-American pitchers for starters, shrink the pitchers from 1979-2003 back to the average size of the pitchers when Cobb played, and I'm sure Rickey's numbers would be even more impressive than they are.

Yes that's true, but that could be said about nearly any player. Looking at stats, Cobb had the lead in OBA .032, in OPS by .135, and WARP3 by 5. Is all of that enough to make him a better lead off hitter though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Henderson batted lead off over 98 percent of the time. A poster at the Houston Chronicle claims that Cobb batted lead off over 77 percent of the time. He also claims he found that info at B-R, but I haven't been able to locate it yet.

This was in response to an article which ranked the top 5 lead off hitters of all time. They ranked Henderson 2nd to Cobb.

Baseball Historian John Shiffert says Cobb primarily batted 3rd or 4th.

...in case you’re interested, Ty Cobb does not appear on any of these lists because he invariably batted third or fourth during his career. He was really a middle-of-the-order hitter, although his type of hitter would now be a top-of-the-order guy. Strategies do change.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the argument for Henderson is that he holds the career records for runs scored, stolen bases, and, until Barry Bonds came along, walks. And those are three pretty important categories for a leadoff hitter.

I guess I'd always assumed Cobb hit leadoff, but for some reason I'd also never wondered how he won the 1909 triple crown while batting 1st.

Ichiro's a pretty good player, but Henderson was basically Ichiro with power, walks, and twice as many steals. So it's hard to argue Rickey isn't better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • You put Ventura in the 1884 Union Association and he wins 57 games just that year. Well, except being a mentally unstable member of a minority group in a less enlightened era, with what was probably a limited grasp of English, I'm thinking he gets shot in a bar the evening after opening day...
    • What does everyone think about Tyler Soderstrom or Kyle McCann? I think I might be willing to trade Basallo if we can get someone like Miller plus some decent depth at catcher. We could also maybe add a couple of our younger lower level prospects to the trade. The A’s are probably looking for as much youth as possible and don’t have as much use for these guys who can contribute now.   I think depth at catcher will be big for the O’s, with as much as they want to DH Adley. Would love to have a lefty hitting catcher with some power to give Adley more regular days off. The biggest hangup I’d have to trading Basallo is that he could end up being that guy. If he doesn’t look like he can stick at catcher, I’d be more willing to trade him because we already have plenty of 1B/DH type guys. 
    • On the other hand, @Sports Guy's take isn't uncommon because Nick had a 7.4 win season at the age of 24. Following a really good season at 23, and a solid rookie season at 22 after he skipped AA. If you look hard enough in the archives here you can find a post I made in 2009 or 2010 saying Nick had about a 1-in-3 chance of being a Hall of Famer. 14 wins through three seasons and age 24 is a heck of a foundation to build on. Lots of Hall of Famers were behind that pace. But unfortunately he never had another 3-win season, much less a seven. Age 27 peak is just an average, it's not destiny. But it's pretty rare to have Nick's first three years and then not have much more career value from age 25-36, total. Injuries or whatever reason, he was worth 14 wins from 22-24, and 20 from 25-36. And as much as I wanted him to stay, his years in Atlanta were just treading water, piling up base hits, but a cumulative value above replacement in six years about equal to his 2008 season. Nick was almost certainly not a difference-maker the large majority of his last 8-9 years in the league.
    • Which one of those is he not on par with in terms of talent? Maybe Chapman? Maybe.
    • Cowser getting the night off tonight makes sense.
    • He's going to be on next year's ballot for the actual Cooperstown HOF. So if they don't care when you're "officially" retired why should the Orioles? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...