Jump to content

Orioles Acquire LHP Cole Irvin from the A's for Darrel Hernaiz


LTO's

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ven6 said:

I like it. It seems smart to me.

Hernaiz was a long shot to survive the gauntlet of prospects ahead of him.

Some of Irvin's numbers I like:

  • 4 years of team control
  • 1.16 WHIP last year
  • less hits (174) than innings pitched (181)
  • 3.56 SO/W ratio 
  • 30 starts, 181 innings suggests an average of 6 innings a start

I think it's more than a suggestion!  😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Why? Kremer was our best SP last year? I’m not saying he is some lock to continue to be but I can’t see on what grounds he has not already earned a spot. 

Right.  I think they are going with pitchers they can count on to be decent AND give them innings.   Kremer, Gibson, and Irvin all figure to do that.  Bradish might do it.   GrayRod might do it.   Wells might do it.  Voth might do it.    The question marks get pushed down the ladder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

If things break right with Grayson/Kremer/Bradish, then Irvin's 4 years of team control "should" mean no Lyles/Gibson-types next year.  

Plus will make it easier to let John Means walk.

Fangraphs Roster Resource has reacted to the transaction by moving Grayson Rodriguez off the Projected MLB Roster (DL Hall was already not there).

Irvin is a classic "baseball is a war of attrition, and what's attrited are pitcher's arms" type.     With Irvin replacing Grayson, the 13 pitchers now projected to the roster threw about 1275, almost all, MLB innings last year.     Andrew Politi's ~70 in the minors I think the only exception.

B-Ref currently has DL Hall at 36 days of service time.    I believe about 170 is needed for a full year of service, so Norfolk until Memorial Day would be about the size of it for the Club to perhaps acquire control of his 2029.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I like this. Better than signing Wacha or Greinke because you have him for four years if he pitches well. Giving up Hernaiz doesn't impact the system much. 

We can complain that the upper tier FAs would have been better (they would have and we should have gotten one) but in isolation this is a strong move.

Agree with this. It's certainly better than wasting money on Wacha or Greinke, but I'd stop short of using the word "strong". A strong move would have been not putting themselves in the position to have to trade for a fringe MLB pitcher like Cole Irvin in the first place. Even if we're hamstrung by monetary constraints (as we suspect) I still don't know why Elias seems so averse to making an impactful trade. I feel like we have the pieces to make a bigger move than this one without compromising our pipeline of young talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, interloper said:

An interesting note: 

I think Hernaiz has to be protected from the Rule 5 after this season. Will be interesting to see if he does enough this season to warrant a 40-man spot on the A's roster. 

Looking ahead, there's no way the O's would have protected him going into 2024. 

That is a great point. Hernaiz wasn’t going to see the majors this year, we would have been hard pressed to put  him on the 40 next year, and it might have been tough to give him minor league playing time at the right level this year. To get anything resembling a major league starting pitcher for someone we couldn’t use and couldn’t keep seems like a win to me.

Edited by George Zuverink
Said could when I meant couldn’t
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

If things break right with Grayson/Kremer/Bradish, then Irvin's 4 years of team control "should" mean no Lyles/Gibson-types next year.  

Means, Hall, Johnson, Povich are more likely to prevent "inning-eater-syndrome" but your point is still valid. Maybe WC has some of Holt's magic fufu dust he can sprinkle on Irvin but since he has already declared Voth-Wells to be superior I doubt he can spare it. (jk, imagine green font, 🙃)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

Plus will make it easier to let John Means walk.

Fangraphs Roster Resource has reacted to the transaction by moving Grayson Rodriguez off the Projected MLB Roster (DL Hall was already not there).

Irvin is a classic "baseball is a war of attrition, and what's attrited are pitcher's arms" type.     With Irvin replacing Grayson, the 13 pitchers now projected to the roster threw about 1275, almost all, MLB innings last year.     Andrew Politi's ~70 in the minors I think the only exception.

B-Ref currently has DL Hall at 36 days of service time.    I believe about 170 is needed for a full year of service, so Norfolk until Memorial Day would be about the size of it for the Club to perhaps acquire control of his 2029.

Completely forgot about Means!  

The MiLB options will be valuable this year...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Agree with this. It's certainly better than wasting money on Wacha or Greinke, but I'd stop short of using the word "strong". A strong move would have been not putting themselves in the position to have to trade for a fringe MLB pitcher like Cole Irvin in the first place. Even if we're hamstrung by monetary constraints (as we suspect) I still don't know why Elias seems so averse to making an impactful trade. I feel like we have the pieces to make a bigger move than this one without compromising our pipeline of young talent. 

At the risk of being a broken record - they should have signed Eovaldi or Bassitt.  It was stupid not to - both are better pitchers with significantly better K rates than Irvin.  That said, acquiring Irvin is fine in a vacuum.  I just think the rotation needed bigger upgrades than the marginal ones Gibson and Irvin will provide.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yardball85 said:

At the risk of being a broken record - they should have signed Eovaldi or Bassitt.  It was stupid not to - both are better pitchers with significantly better K rates than Irvin.  That said, acquiring Irvin is fine in a vacuum.  I just think the rotation needed bigger upgrades than the marginal ones Gibson and Irvin will provide.

Can you count on Eovaldi to be both better and give you as many innings as Irvin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Tough crowd. If we signed Irvin as a FA for 3/21 then everyone would be impressed. I think people just want to see us spend millions. Hernaiz is probably a utility guy in the minors when Holliday is in Bowie for the 2nd half of the season. 
 

This trade was the very definition of trading from a strength. Hernaiz’s value is at SS. He was never going to be a SS for us. 

Umm …no I wouldn’t  be. Don’t care about the player we gave up. We need quality not quantity acquisitions. This is just more for the trash pile. Another 5 starter and a never will be minor league player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Upside strikeout guys: Grayson, Bradish, and Kremer

Innings eaters: Gibson and Irvin

Swingmen: Voth, Wells, Hall

Emergency: Zimmermann, Baumann, Watkins

Late season reinforcement if things go well: Rom, Povich if he moves quickly out of AA

 

Could all change quickly but that's how I see it. 

Definitely add Means into the late season reinforcements category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here was a pretty good comment poking around an OAKLAND commentary section....

 

Someone needs to come off 40 man roster to fit in Jesus Aguilar. I thought maybe a trade with Kap but he’s injured, This is a surprise, Cole figured to be opening day starter. We do have a lot of starting pitcher depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

His career minor league ERA was 3.05.  Never doubt Roll Tide’s ability to just make stuff up. 

Must you be a troll with every smart ass post? 
 

Irvin “ 4.00 ERA pitcher with a terrible K per 9.“

 

Virbitsky “And a 5 era minor leaguer” 

 

So Irvin’s ERA in the majors in career (4 seasons) is 4.40. I could care less what his minor league numbers after being up for 4 MLB seasons. 
 

Virbisky is the minor leaguer with the 4.49 ERA.

So what did I make up?
 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • the question isn’t about being able to make the offers, it’s about being awarded compensatory picks for more than one.
    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...