Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Interestingly, Rodriguez appears to have taken a little bit off velocity wise for the increased command. It will be interesting to see if that's what he did r if his velocity was just a bit down for whatever reason. Screenshot2023-05-01081237.thumb.png.faeb5aec703dd2cdf38add04ad33d249.png 

 

I wonder if he wasn’t getting movement on his off-speed deliveries  due overthrowing them a bit and consciously decided to dial everything down to get his movement & break back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

I wonder if he wasn’t getting movement on his off-speed deliveries  due overthrowing them a bit and consciously decided to dial everything down to get his movement & break back. 

It will be interesting to see how the numbers look in his next start. I really don't care how hard he throws if he's going to toss five shutout innings with 9 Ks. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely had the lowest velo of his season so far, interesting that his max velo on Saturday sat below his average velo in his first 3 starts. (The middle line inside of each box is the average velo/ride for each start).

Also with the downtick in velo, his vertical break on the fastball also went down about 1".  The CSW was meh at 24% on the four seam on Saturday, but all his other secondaries played so well, you don't really care if the fastball shape wasn't at its usual peak.  If he can harness 3 secondaries by tempering his approach, I'm all for it too! 

It was also low 60s and probably felt colder in Detroit on Saturday.  A bit blustery for the Texas boy.

image.png.7aea893200af94f1e13831fd87adde05.png

image.png.0a24c0a47e3f67157359a9a1c1dbf3be.png

 

 

Edited by nvpacchi
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, eddie83 said:

The only logic I could see in Kremer facing ATL is if they think they can use an extrawork day to help him out. Otherwise it’s a no brainer. Let him face KC 

Also if Kremer faces KC and struggles again, it's a much easier decision to demote him to the minors.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn’t know where to post this.  We talk a lot about the Orioles “babying” pitchers and Grayson specifically so I figured this would be a good spot.  I’ve spent the last few years studying on work loads, mechanics, and monitoring acute and chronic fatigue.  This article sums up everything that goes into the decision making process nicely:

https://apple.news/AXr8bLSCjTn-D0NpM3-Nsig
 

Edited by emmett16
  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, emmett16 said:

Didn’t know where to post this.  We talk a lot about the Orioles “babying” pitchers and Grayson specifically so I figured this would be a good spot.  I’ve spent the last few years studying on work loads, mechanics, and monitoring acute and chronic fatigue.  This article sums up everything that goes into the decision making process nicely:

https://apple.news/AXr8bLSCjTn-D0NpM3-Nsig
 

Verducci's a good chronicler.

The Grayson choice of weak lineup on 4 days or strong lineup on 5 days will be interesting to see how the cross pressures are evaluated.     Thursday vs. Lyles also a getaway day scenario, so another fraction less.

Fresher Grayson vs. Acuna, etc would be spicier theater.

The Braves coming off the Monday doubleheader have a similar choice with Strider and Morton - Strider's 107 pitches Monday were a career high.     Saturday or Sunday?

Edited by Just Regular
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

There's a few Grayson threads going but this seemed like the logical one in which to post this.   I was at the game last night and it seemed to me that Grayson was throwing his curve ball way more than in other starts.  So, I've gone through the gamefeeds from all of Grayson's starts, and put together this chart .  All numbers are percentages of pitches thrown, not raw numbers.

Date	FB	Cutter	Change	Curve	Slider
4.05	49	5	17	6	23
4.11	46	1	18	3	31
4.16	40	17	29	1	13
4.23	45	5	18	13	18
4.29	45	11	25	11	8
5.04	42	22	25	5	6
5.09	31	20	26	18	6

This shows some interesting trends.  Grayson was relying very heavily on his slider in his early starts, but has thrown it only occasionally the last three outings.  He's gone to his curve a lot more recently, and also is throwing his cutter a great deal more than in his early starts.

Per Fangraphs, the changeup has been his most effective pitch (no surprise there), followed by the cutter.  His other pitches have negative pitch values, with the fastball being the worst, followed by the curve and the slider.  

It will be interesting to follow how Grayson's pitch mix evolves as the year goes along.  

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There's a few Grayson threads going but this seemed like the logical one in which to post this.   I was at the game last night and it seemed to me that Grayson was throwing his curve ball way more than in other starts.  So, I've gone through the gamefeeds from all of Grayson's starts, and put together this chart .  All numbers are percentages of pitches thrown, not raw numbers.

Date	FB	Cutter	Change	Curve	Slider
4.05	49	5	17	6	23
4.11	46	1	18	3	31
4.16	40	17	29	1	13
4.23	45	5	18	13	18
4.29	45	11	25	11	8
5.04	42	22	25	5	6
5.09	31	20	26	18	6

This shows some interesting trends.  Grayson was relying very heavily on his slider in his early starts, but has thrown it only occasionally the last three outings.  He's gone to his curve a lot more recently, and also is throwing his cutter a great deal more than in his early starts.

Per Fangraphs, the changeup has been his most effective pitch (no surprise there), followed by the cutter.  His other pitches have negative pitch values, with the fastball being the worst, followed by the curve and the slider.  

It will be interesting to follow how Grayson's pitch mix evolves as the year goes along.  

It might not be evolution, I would think that the mix would vary with the opposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

It might not be evolution, I would think that the mix would vary with the opposition.

I agree.  Or, just going with whatever’s feeling good on a given night.  But I have a feeling that he’s cut back on the slider because he hasn’t had good command of it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I watched the whole game. Seemed to make a concerted effort to pitch fastballs lower in the zone early. Control looked better than any of his starts in Baltimore this season. He was also up against a lineup with many major leaguers like Franchy Cordero and Wilmer Difo, as well as great prospects. Impressive!

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He still only threw 46 pitches of his 98 in the strike zone. Getting AAA hitters to chase is not super hard with his stuff so I would have liked to have seen him work more in the zone.

Pitches in strikezone:

FB - 22 of 46
CH -  10 of 18
CB -  6 of 13
CT - 2 of 8
SL - 1 of 9
 

He got most of his WHIF on fastball's up from what I can tell. A little better on getting his offspeed pitches over.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

He still only threw 46 pitches of his 98 in the strike zone. Getting AAA hitters to chase is not super hard with his stuff so I would have liked to have seen him work more in the zone.

Pitches in strikezone:

FB - 22 of 46
CH -  10 of 18
CB -  6 of 13
CT - 2 of 8
SL - 1 of 9
 

He got most of his WHIF on fastball's up from what I can tell. A little better on getting his offspeed pitches over.

 

Well it depends. He had a 68% str%, so if he was getting ahead and then guys were go out of the zone vs his offspeed stuff, that’s what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This times 1000.   A five game losing streak where we’ve lost exactly 1.5 games in the standings, by the way. You would think we were suddenly ten games behind the Yankees (who’s asses we just finished kicking five days ago) with the way people act.    Good time for an OH vacation for me because the flop sweat around here is flooding the place. 
    • I don't know if anyone is questioning if the Orioles will still qualify for the postseason after this recent rough stretch. However, the concern that I am seeing/reading/hearing is that once October begins, we don't have the kind of pitching talent necessary to go deep into the Fall by winning multiple rounds against teams who have better pitching talent. 
    • I believe this is truly the "all in " year...not next year or the year after. After this year, it's conceivable we could lose Burnes, and Santander, and that would mean two of the best and(among) the most important players on the team. No Burnes(he'll command at least 30 million a year and likely more) would maybe give us ONE solid pitcher in Grod, and our outfield will be in flux. No, I think THIS is the year the Orioles have to win, and that means some dramatic, possibly risky trades at the break yield some significant upgrades to our beleaguered pitching both with starters and the pen. If we don't get it this year, we may never have a potential post season team in the next couple of years..not at this rate.
    • Luke Dickerson, SS, Morris Knolls HS, Rockaway, N.J. There are shades of Jackson Merrill and Sammy Stafura with Dickerson as a northeast/mid-atlantic prep shortstop who has received a lot of late helium this spring. He’s an offense-oriented righthanded hitter with a background as a talented hockey player. He might fit better at second base or center field, but teams like his hit/power combination enough to take him inside the first two rounds. He had a solid showing at the draft combine last week, as well. 
    • As the bluejays continue to fade, I cant help but think that they would be a trade fit if they decide to sell.  Specifically Gausman and Berrios. Gausman is under contract for 2 seasons after this one, and Berrios has 4 years with an opt out after 2 years. So you would essentially have both of those guys for 2.5 years which would be a big boost for 2024, and the coming years with Burnes likely gone and Bradish out for 2025. They are both on hefty contracts (for Orioles standards) but with our payroll and new ownership group you would think that wouldnt be a huge problem. Not sure what the asking price would be for one of, or both, of those guys but worth looking into. I know its hard to look at trading within the division, especially what would potentially be a "blockbuster" type of  deal but I just dont see a ton of options on the trade market right now outside of the White Sox, A's and Rockies and none of those teams can match what the bluejays have to offer.
    • He was all of that yes, but nothing close to Gunner so far or Cal's best year, and you also forgot about Eddie. not to mention Palmer in the 70,s
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...