Jump to content

Adam Frazier 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, Brooks The Great said:

For the salary, that production makes him a scrub. I've qualified that in previous posts, but not specifically in that one you quoted. Although I did point out that he's overpaid - which he most certainly is - in that particular post.

I honestly would much prefer Odor and his production for his salary last year to Frazier's production and salary that year, and that's a pathetic reflection of Frazier and the decision Elias made to sign him.

In my opinion, salary is irrelevant to whether you are a scrub.  You’re a decent player, or you’re not.  I think Frazier is a much better player than Odor.  Is he worth $8 mm?  Debatable, but he’s worth a good bit more than Odor.  

it will be interesting to see where Frazier lands next season and what sone team is willing to pay him.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, interloper said:

Right now, his slash is identical to his 2022 with Seattle with exception of his slugging, which is .100 points higher (.410 vs .311). 

So, while I don't think we're looking at a return to his All Star form, we are definitely getting a more useful player than what Seattle had, at least for the moment.

Other things of interest:

2022 OAA - 91 percentile
2023 OAA - 2 percentile

2022 Arm Strength - 61 
2023 Arm Strength - 5

His xSLG, xwOBA, and Barrel are all slightly up this year, but all still pretty blue. 

Something appears to be killing him with the OAA and Arm Strength compared to last year. It's so drastic a drop off to almost seem erroneous. His arm does seem weak, but can it really be that much weaker than last year?

There's absolutely no way in hell he went from one 91 percentile to 2 percentile.  Didn't happen.  This is why people should be a lot more skeptical about the "stats" particularly defensive ones.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Anybody who pines for Odor because Frazier is costing the Angelos family just a little too much.....

I honestly just can't wrap my mind around that.

It depends on whether the team would have spent the $7.3 mm on someone else, and if so, who.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It depends on whether the team would have spent the $7.3 mm on someone else, and if so, who.  

Well you have to factor in that Odor actually provided negative value last year.

Adam Frazier's contract is not stopping this team from doing anything financially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

That’s what I think.

I understand what you think.  Me and you are pretty much on the same page, and have been the whole time, regarding the Frazier saga.

What I can't understand is wanting to see Odor in a O's uniform again.  I literally can't fathom it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Anybody who pines for Odor because Frazier is costing the Angelos family just a little too much.....

I honestly just can't wrap my mind around that.

The main issue I had with the Frazier signing is if the Orioles are on a tight payroll then that $8M could be spent elsewhere with Westburg and Ortiz in the farm system ready to play 2B.

Frazier is the anti-Odor and he's been a solid contributor this year with surprising power. Frazier is on pace for 19 home runs when his single season career high was 10 home runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The main issue I had with the Frazier signing is if the Orioles are on a tight payroll then that $8M could be spent elsewhere with Westburg and Ortiz in the farm system ready to play 2B.

Frazier is the anti-Odor and he's been a solid contributor this year with surprising power. Frazier is on pace for 19 home runs when his single season career high was 10 home runs.

Arguments for Westburg or Ortiz I fully understand.  I don't always agree with everything those people might presume, but I fully understand them.  And sympathize with them frankly.

Arguments for bringing back Odor leave me stupefied.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

I understand what you think.  Me and you are pretty much on the same page, and have been the whole time, regarding the Frazier saga.

What I can't understand is wanting to see Odor in a O's uniform again.  I literally can't fathom it.

Only if Odor isn’t taking up a roster spot and is just a guy we have ready in the dugout when a fight breaks out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Only if Odor isn’t taking up a roster spot and is just a guy we have ready in the dugout when a fight breaks out. 

You know I like Odor.  If he were brought back as part of the org as a coach or something, I'd love that.  He's not Willie Calhoun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way I would want Odor over Frazier so I'm not even sure how that could be pined for be anybody not related to Odor. I will say what I said on 105.7 this afternoon, I still think Westburg was and is the best option as the everyday 2B. That doesn't mean Frazier hasn't been doing ok, and obviously the power has surprised us all, but if I had my druthers, Westburg would be manning 2B and Frazier would be a utility guy filling in at 2B and corner outfield and providing a contact bat off the bench late in games. 

It's also worth noting that Frazier's lack of ability to get the ball out of his glove last night in the 9th cost the Orioles a game ending double-play. Little things like that don't always show up in the defensive metrics and for the most part he's been fine at tuning DPs, but he has made a few more mistakes then I was expecting defensively.

But I'll take the power that I wasn't expecting over the slight slip in defense. 

Saying all of that, I'm not sure you mix with a winning formula. the Orioles re clearly winning a lot of games with Frazier at 2B and has contributed in several games with key hits. For all of his limitations, he is a high leverage guy and does a lot of things to help a team win that also doesn't show up in the box scores or stats. 

Do I still think Westburg would have been the better option this year at 2B? I do. Am I'm concerned that Frazier is the main starter at 2B right now? No I am not. 

BTW, I think it would be interesting to mic up Frazier during the game and see if he's really always that deadpan/boring or if that is just his interview style?

  • Upvote 2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

There is no way I would want Odor over Frazier so I'm not even sure how that could be pined for be anybody not related to Odor. I will say what I said on 105.7 this afternoon, I still think Westburg was and is the best option as the everyday 2B. That doesn't mean Frazier hasn't been doing ok, and obviously the power has surprised us all, but if I had my druthers, Westburg would be manning 2B and Frazier would be a utility guy filling in at 2B and corner outfield and providing a contact bat off the bench late in games. 

It's also worth noting that Frazier's lack of ability to get the ball out of his glove last night in the 9th cost the Orioles a game ending double-play. Little things like that don't always show up in the defensive metrics and for the most part he's been fine at tuning DPs, but he has made a few more mistakes then I was expecting defensively.

But I'll take the power that I wasn't expecting over the slight slip in defense. 

Saying all of that, I'm not sure you mix with a winning formula. the Orioles re clearly winning a lot of games with Frazier at 2B and has contributed in several games with key hits. For all of his limitations, he is a high leverage guy and does a lot of things to help a team win that also doesn't show up in the box scores or stats. 

Do I still think Westburg would have been the better option this year at 2B? I do. Am I'm concerned that Frazier is the main starter at 2B right now? No I am not. 

BTW, I think it would be interesting to mic up Frazier during the game and see if he's really always that deadpan/boring or if that is just his interview style?

Dude probably read his offseason thread and is just silently seething at the fanbase.  LOL.

Oh, you want an interview?   Yeah, I got an interview for you.

Edited by Pickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've been thinking about #2 a lot and wondering why this didn't come up at Elias' press conference.  I think the answer if you have to target a RH bat who isn't solely power-focused or chasing HR numbers, but who is otherwise a caliber of lefty-masher better than Mounty. Or, you force that hitter here via trade.
    • Last offseason with John (I am so poor) Angelos still in charge, along with the depth in the upper minor leagues it made sense to make a trade for someone like Burnes.  I don't think Elias should be looking at making a trade this offseason using any of our young talent.  It is time for Rubenstein to open the checkbook and land us a TOR starter and a big bat.  The days of having too many prospects is over, I want to see us have some solid depth options in AAA if we need it.
    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...