Jump to content

Jorge Mateo 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Yeah, the thought on trading him is really only if someone was willing to overpay, but that isn’t happening until he has a track record of success. 

I touted him all of last year and really feel like he deserved consideration for a GG. I’m fine with enjoying the fruits of his labors in the meantime. He makes games exciting to watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Can we please put Mateo in the top part of the lineup to pair with Cedric and Adley now? Especially if you're going to sit Santander and no one is fitting for cleanup? Please?

Mullens/Mateo 1+2

Adly 3

Mountcastle 4 (If no Santander)

It's not a bad thought. But it's not broke right now, so it may be hard justifying trying to fix it. If we bunch up our best hitters (along with Hays) it may give us better odds of scoring the inning that they are all batting. However, the downside is those innings that they are not. It might be worth a look-see though.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Explosivo said:

Perhaps he really has figured out to hit. Perhaps this is the real Mateo.

Well, I doubt it, because pretty much nobody posts a 1.050 OPS.  But if we can get a stretch like this and not have him then go equally ice cold, we’ve got a heck of a good player.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m really interested to see how long Mateo can stay this hot. 28 games is a long time to maintain an OPS over 1.000. Nosing around, looks like his best 28-game patch last summer was about .940.  

Would that have been July and August of last year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m really interested to see how long Mateo can stay this hot. 28 games is a long time to maintain an OPS over 1.000. Nosing around, looks like his best 28-game patch last summer was about .940.  

What if this is something more than a hot streak? He has always had the talent, but had a tremendous whole in his swing. If he has actually been able to fix that, could he be one of those high ceilinged late bloomers like JD Martinez?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...