Jump to content

MASN loses in NY Court of Appeals


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I’m not at all surprised by this result.   The rights fees for 2012-16 are now settled per the decision of the RSDC, affirmed by the court.  There are collateral issues about set-offs for distribution of MASN profits, and any interest due, that now have to be resolved through a AAA arbitration if the parties don’t agree.   These are simple issues that normal parties would resolve quickly without the need for further arbitration, but I won’t be shocked if MASN and the Orioles drag this out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

Thanks for staying on top of this Frobby. I have a strange question. Do you know under the terms of the MASN deal who actually owns the TV rights to the Nats. For instance, could MASN sell or outsource the broadcast rights to another RSN? 

I have a copy of the MASN contract and can check that.  Don’t have time right now, but I will get back to you on that.  

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so does this now mean the rights fees are a settled issue? If so, what reason would the Orioles have to further delay payment, unless seeking appeal in a higher court? Also, I'm slightly confused about the NY court system, the NY court of appeals is the highest court in the state so no further appeals in NY?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I’m not at all surprised by this result.   The rights fees for 2012-16 are now settled per the decision of the RSDC, affirmed by the court.  There are collateral issues about set-offs for distribution of MASN profits, and any interest due, that now have to be resolved through a AAA arbitration if the parties don’t agree.   These are simple issues that normal parties would resolve quickly without the need for further arbitration, but I won’t be shocked if MASN and the Orioles drag this out.  

So the Washington Post who said a ruling was coming around this week was sort of right. So now the Orioles can move since Baltimore City filed a brief to the court saying if you rule against the Orioles, they would not be sustainable in Baltimore. 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Going Underground said:

So the Washington Post who said a ruling was coming around this week was sort of right.

I believe they said last week that a ruling could come as early as the end of last week.   Close enough!  I wonder how they knew that.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

From the Sun:

The Orioles could, in theory, appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it’s unlikely the court would accept the case. The decision Tuesday could pave the way for the Nationals to receive roughly $100 million that the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network placed in escrow in 2019.

I really hope this is the beginning of the end of this saga. I can't help but feel that there was bad faith acting on all sides of this thing and it just needs to end. And I really don't care at what expense to the Orioles and MASN at this point. Thanks for the reply

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

The Orioles could, in theory, appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it’s unlikely the court would accept the case. The decision Tuesday could pave the way for the Nationals to receive roughly $100 million that the Mid-Atlantic Sports Network placed in escrow in 2019.

Start sending box seats to the justices, baby!  Give 'em Rutschman jerseys!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Banner:

 

MASN and the Orioles have argued in court documents that the award could threaten the sustainability of the network as well as the competitiveness, economic viability and ability of the team to remain in Baltimore.

 

Nashville, Nashville here we come.Right back where my wife's music career started from.

Seriously, I won der if the Orioles would give more consideration to the Ted Leonsis offer to buy MASN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...