Jump to content

Ortiz vs Westburg


Sports Guy

Westburg vs Ortiz  

28 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you do with Ortiz and Westburg?

    • Keep Ortiz and trade Westburg
    • Keep Westburg and trade Ortiz?

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/31/23 at 20:35

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Frobby said:

If Ortiz is going to be a starter and has a better glove than Holliday, why wouldn’t you put Ortiz at SS and make Holliday the 2B?

If Holliday has a league average SS glove or higher you put him at SS. There is too much value to be had with a SS who can hit. It's easier to find a 2nd baseman who can hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

If Holliday has a league average SS glove or higher you put him at SS. There is too much value to be had with a SS who can hit. It's easier to find a 2nd baseman who can hit.

The situation I was discussing was the one where Holliday and Ortiz are both starters in our infield.  If that’s the case, the better defender of the two plays SS.  It’s that simple.  I’m not talking about the situation where we find someone else who hits better than Ortiz to play 2B.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

If Holliday has a league average SS glove or higher you put him at SS. There is too much value to be had with a SS who can hit. It's easier to find a 2nd baseman who can hit.

We already have both of them. You don't have to find anyone. If Holliday is league average and Ortiz is better, why not switch them? We'd have two shortstops who can hit, so play the best defender at short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The situation I was discussing was the one where Holliday and Ortiz are both starters in our infield.  If that’s the case, the better defender of the two plays SS.  It’s that simple.  I’m not talking about the situation where we find someone else who hits better than Ortiz to play 2B.   

While it could happen, I think it ignores the reality of why Elias took Holliday over Jones. He said that him being a SS was the tipping point.

I don’t think he spent that money and made that pick to put him at second base.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The situation I was discussing was the one where Holliday and Ortiz are both starters in our infield.  If that’s the case, the better defender of the two plays SS.  It’s that simple.  I’m not talking about the situation where we find someone else who hits better than Ortiz to play 2B.   

Ok. I understand the distinction. Yes, I agree, the better defender of the two should play SS if they are the only options. But I don't believe they will be our only 2 options in the future.

Edited by Mr-splash
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

While it could happen, I think it ignores the reality of why Elias took Holliday over Jones. He said that him being a SS was the tipping point.

I don’t think he spent that money and made that pick to put him at second base.

 

I agree. Frobby clarified and said that the better defender should play SS and while I would agree with him if there were no other options at 2B. But I dont want to sacrifice offense under any circumstance if I have SS who can hit. For me personally I cannot turn down a hitting SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's like we have Adley at catcher. We don't have to worry about finding offensive production from the most difficult position on the field. That is a major problem to not have. It's extremely hard to find catchers who can hit. While it is easier to find shortstops who can hit, it's still the 2nd hardest position to find offensive production. If Holliday can play the position well, I cannot turn down that type of offense at SS. You can find people to 2B and hit. It's not easy to find a SS who can hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ortiz has a 0% walk rate in his small sample size here in the MLB. He has a 7% walk rate at AAA. That's just flat out bad. I don't want that in my lineup everyday if I can avoid that. So if Holliday can play SS, he's gotta play the position. I don't want a guy who can't produce offensively in my lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Ortiz has a 0% walk rate in his small sample size here in the MLB. He has a 7% walk rate at AAA. That's just flat out bad. I don't want that in my lineup everyday if I can avoid that.

Weren't you just talking up Mateo earlier today?  The guy with a 174 OBP over the last 28 days?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on what is out there in trade offers, and do they get what they believe is fair compensation. If I can only have one, it’s Ortiz. I likely play him at 2B with Holliday at SS in the long term. Westburg, IMO, is likely a fairly athletic 3B or COF long term. He can play SS and 2B, but we have better defenders there, and a lot of them.

Personally, I would keep both and seriously consider Westburg in COF. Hays and Santander are both potentially replaceable with Westburg and Cowser. Westburg has some swing and miss concerns, but I think he can produce at least at Hays’ level, for a lot less money. I am not sure he is capable of being a premium defender in a COF, but I’m not sure Hays is anymore either. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Weren't you just talking up Mateo earlier today?  The guy with a 174 OBP over the last 28 days?

Mateo is an excellent defensive shortstop. Problem is he cannot hit. If we had a SS in our organization who could hit, I'd calling for Mateo to be traded. Problem is the only player in our organization who can (or projects) to play SS well and hit well at the MLB level is Holliday. H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

Ortiz has a 0% walk rate in his small sample size here in the MLB. He has a 7% walk rate at AAA. That's just flat out bad. I don't want that in my lineup everyday if I can avoid that. So if Holliday can play SS, he's gotta play the position. I don't want a guy who can't produce offensively in my lineup. 

You basically have it right now with Mateo.

PS I don’t know enough about Holliday’s defense to say whether or not he should be starting over Ortiz at SS. I do know that Ortiz has looked superb everywhere he has played defensively.

Edited by Hank Scorpio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

You basically have it right now with Mateo.

PS I don’t know enough about Holliday’s defense to say whether or not he should be starting over Ortiz at SS. I do know that Ortiz has looked superb everywhere he has played defensively.

I'm not questioning Ortiz's defensive chops. I'm saying I don't want a weak hitter in my lineup if I can avoid that. What if we had a better defensive catcher than Adley in our organization, but he was a poor hitter? What do you do then? Move Adley to 1B or DH and then have an offensive black hole in your lineup. 

 

Hello, the most important tool is the hit tool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Mr-splash said:

I agree. Frobby clarified and said that the better defender should play SS and while I would agree with him if there were no other options at 2B. But I dont want to sacrifice offense under any circumstance if I have SS who can hit. For me personally I cannot turn down a hitting SS.

I’m just waiting to find out how good Ortiz’s offense will be at the major league level, and same for Westburg, whose defense I also need to see.  You already may have stuck Ortiz in the “weak slap hitter” category based on his first 28 PA in the majors, but I’m definitely not ready to jump to that conclusion.  The guy had a .193 ISO in the minors last year, .204 this year, and his exit velocities in AAA have been very good.  So I want to see a lot more than 28 PA in the majors before labeling Ortiz.

As to Westburg, I’ve heard a wide variance of opinion about his defense, and I really want to see that for myself, rather than relying on others’ opinions.  And I want to see how his bat translates in the majors, as well.  He has more power than Ortiz but he may not be the better overall hitter (or, maybe he is).   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr-splash said:

I'm not questioning Ortiz's defensive chops. I'm saying I don't want a weak hitter in my lineup if I can avoid that. What if we had a better defensive catcher than Adley in our organization, but he was a poor hitter? What do you do then? Move Adley to 1B or DH and then have an offensive black hole in your lineup. 

 

Hello, the most important tool is the hit tool. 

What evidence, like real evidence not SSS bs that shows your inability to understand things, do you have that Ortiz is a light hitter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
    • He should be taking fly balls all winter.
    • That was a lot of fun. Felt like there are certain elite seasons that had to be part of the team, and then tried to build from there.  Outfield depth is a little shaky, as is the rotation — though the latter is probably mostly unavoidable. The lineup would rake and the bullpen would shove, so pretty happy with this combination.   C 2022 Adley Rutschman (5.4 rWAR) 1B: 1998 Rafael Palmeiro (6.3) 2B: 2005 Brian Roberts (7.3) 3B: 2015 Manny Machado (7.5) SS: 2024 Gunnar Henderson (8.9) LF: 1999 Brady Anderson (5.9) CF: 2021 Cedric Mullins (5.9) RF: 2008 Nick Markakis (7.4) DH: 2013 Chris Davis (7.1) Bench: 2003 Melvin Mora (4.7) Bench: 2006 Miguel Tejada (4.5) Bench: 2011 Matt Wieters (5.2) Bench: 2001 Jeff Conine (2.9)   SP: 2000 Mike Mussina (5.7) SP: 2007 Erik Bedard (5.7) SP: 2019 John Means (4.4) SP: 2002 Rodrigo Lopez (3.7) SP: 2010 Jeremy Guthrie (4.5) RP: 2016 Zach Britton (4.1) RP: 2023 Felix Bautista (3.0) RP: 2004 B.J. Ryan (3.4) RP: 2012 Jim Johnson (2.4) RP: 2014 Darren O’Day (2.4) RP: 2017 Brad Brach (1.2) RP: 2009 George Sherrill (1.7) RP: 2018 Richard Bleier (1.5)
    • Gray started off well  but then ran out of steam a bit. He's not getting any younger. I was interested in him last year but I think the Cardinals overpaid and his contract only gets worse. 
    • A bit. Nothing life changing, but the format seems…Cleaner.
    • That was a tough challenge.    C Adley 2022 C Charles Johnson 2000 SS Gunnar 2024 3B Cal 1999 2B Schoop 2017 1B Davis 2014 UTIL Tejada 2006 CF Cedric 2021 LF Markakis 2008 RF 2012 Adam Jones DH/OF Luke Scott 2010 DH/1B David Segui 2001 OF Luis Matos 2005 (defense sub) CL Britton 2016 RHP Koji 2011 RHP O'Day 2013 RHP Sherrill 2009 LHP Bleier 2018 (good call Frobby) LHP Groom 2002 SP1 Mussina 1998 SP2 Bedard 2007 SP3 Bradish 2023 SP4 Chen 2015 SP5 Rodrigo Lopez 2004 RHP Ponson 2003 LHP Means 2019
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...