Jump to content

The Westburg and Cowser dilemma


Sanity Check

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

You won’t know this until next year.

Actually, we won’t know the cutoff for 2023 until after the 2025 season is complete.  But it’s never been less than 2 years, 115 days, and we are already below that.  Super 2 should not be any factor at this point. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People really want their to be some sort of conspiracy for Cowser and Westburg not being up. Honestly if Cowser hadn't been injured when Mullins went down, he probably comes up and the Orioles don't sign Hicks. But, the Orioles don't seem to want to recall prospects to be the 25th-26th man (the Lester role), and other then that, the team is 18 games above .500, O'Hearn is hitting, Frazier is hitting, Urias is hitting, Hicks is playing well. Why mess with something that's working? and bench guys that are playing well? 

I get that we don't think that some of those guys will keep that up, and we want to see the prospects we keep hearing about, and they're killing it at Triple-A...but the major league team goal is to win, and it's currently winning. You don't bench guys doing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

You aren’t completely taking anyone out..you are just taking away at bats from those who should have them taken away.  

Well by definition you are taking 2 of your field players off of the roster, and I don't think the Orioles are calling up Westburg and Cowser at this point in the season unless they plan to play them most days (now in August they seem to be more willing to do that). BTW Frazier has a .743 OPS against RHP, now he probably shouldn't be playing against LHP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really we should call Westburg up to replace the 3rd C on 6/15 because we're facing a LH SP.  However, I think we the off days, and we're only facing one LH SP in the Cubs series, I could see us playing it extra safe with the Super Two deadline and calling up Westburg on 6/22 for the home series versus the Mariners. 

Mountcastle needs some time off to get his vertigo straightened out then we should start him out in the FCL on a slow rehab. 

Cowser is a different story.  He needs to prove he's back 100% healthy and hitting.  Then I see him coming up and taking Mckenna's positon, with Santander moving into a 1B/DH role more.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, seak05 said:

Well by definition you are taking 2 of your field players off of the roster, and I don't think the Orioles are calling up Westburg and Cowser at this point in the season unless they plan to play them most days (now in August they seem to be more willing to do that). BTW Frazier has a .743 OPS against RHP, now he probably shouldn't be playing against LHP

They can easily play them 4-5 days a week and taking off 2 players off the current roster is pretty easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They can easily play them 4-5 days a week and taking off 2 players off the current roster is pretty easy.

Westburg should be playing 2B over Frazier versus LHP.  We could trot out an all RH lineup.  

vs LH SP

1. Hicks CF

2. Adley DH

3. Santa 1B

4. Hays LF

5. Westburg 2B

6. Urias  3B

7. McCann C

8. Mckenna RF

9. Mateo SS

Gunnar, Frazier, O'Hearn, Lester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

And Mateo

Trading Mateo is silly.  If he loses his job to one of the prospects fine but he is  absolutely perfect in a bench role on a team looking to contend.  Who wouldn't want to have his speed and defense available late in a game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

Trading Mateo is silly.  If he loses his job to one of the prospects fine but he is  absolutely perfect in a bench role on a team looking to contend.  Who wouldn't want to have his speed and defense available late in a game?

Not trade..bench 

However, if he can be part of a package a starter, in trading him without hesitation.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Westburg should be playing 2B over Frazier versus LHP.  We could trot out an all RH lineup.  

vs LH SP

1. Hicks CF

2. Adley DH

3. Santa 1B

4. Hays LF

5. Westburg 2B

6. Urias  3B

7. McCann C

8. Mckenna RF

9. Mateo SS

Gunnar, Frazier, O'Hearn, Lester

I know that Gunnar struggled to hit LHP early on. But do you really want to make him a part time/platoon player, given what you have seen him do this past week? What I see is a budding player with star (maybe even) superstar potential figuring things out at this level. Is that something worth messing with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...