Jump to content

The First Rough Patch


SilentJames

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't call it a true rough patch unless there's a significant losing streak during which we get repeatedly blown out--and, 37% of the way through the season now, we haven't yet come anywhere close to something like that (fingers crossed).

As Frobby has often pointed out in the past, all of the successful Oriole teams have had much rougher weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 3 factors leading to the rough patch have been talked to death in countless threads:

  • Need better bullpen management.  Our top relievers are overused.
  • Starters need to make it deeper into games.
  • Need more production offensively from our infielders.

Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest... players like Urias, Mateo, Frazier... were expected to be placeholders. Anything they gave you over and above that was gravy.

There were periods of time where they flashed brightly...  and may have caused some consideration to be given to hanging on to any of them.

But in the end... the team has built the best farm in baseball. And the time has come to supplant these placeholder players with far better players now bubbling up through the system. And for those concerned that one or two of the AAA star players coming along may not have the MLB chops.. there's another crop that looks just as good coming behind that one.

Let's get on with it already.

The only pity is that we didn't unload these placeholder players at their peak. (I say this knowing that this isn't always possible)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, owknows said:

To be honest... players like Urias, Mateo, Frazier... were expected to be placeholders. Anything they gave you over and above that was gravy.

There were periods of time where they flashed brightly...  and may have caused some consideration to be given to hanging on to any of them.

But in the end... the team has built the best farm in baseball. And the time has come to supplant these placeholder players with far better players now bubbling up through the system. And for those concerned that one or two of the AAA star players coming along may not have the MLB chops.. there's another crop that looks just as good coming behind that one.

Let's get on with it already.

The only pity is that we didn't unload these placeholder players at their peak. (I say this knowing that this isn't always possible)

There's always the possibility of a rookie phenom, but it's rare--and I'd rather have a replacement-level veteran with pennant-race and post-season experience than a prospect flailing away to reach the Mendoza Line, e.g. Stowers and Henderson this year, Vavra last year, and Rutschman his first month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LA2 said:

There's always the possibility of a rookie phenom, but it's rare--and I'd rather have a replacement-level veteran with pennant-race and post-season experience than a prospect flailing away to reach the Mendoza Line, e.g. Stowers and Henderson this year, Vavra last year, and Rutschman his first month.

I think the team could afford one of those replacement level vets.

But not four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, owknows said:

I think the team could afford one of those replacement level vets.

But not four.

Stowers vs. Hicks

Henderson / Vavra / Ortiz vs. Urias / Frazier / Mateo

??  vs. McCann

Your choice.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Stowers vs. Hicks

Henderson / Vavra / Ortiz vs. Urias / Frazier / Mateo

??  vs. McCann

Your choice.

 

 

You're stuck with McCann... he can be the one replacement level vet.

Hicks is here until Mullins... shouldn't be long

Henderson, Westburg, Ortiz instead of Urias, Mateo, Frazier sounds fine to me.

And Platoon Mountcastle while you're at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, owknows said:

Hicks is here until Mullins... shouldn't be long

Guy had a 1.233 OPS as an Oriole before getting another hit tonight; I wouldn't purchase his ticket off the island just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, owknows said:

You're stuck with McCann... he can be the one replacement level vet.

Hicks is here until Mullins... shouldn't be long

Henderson, Westburg, Ortiz instead of Urias, Mateo, Frazier sounds fine to me.

And Platoon Mountcastle while you're at it.

Ortiz hasn't played in about two weeks due to an illness and now bad air quality..He will need some time to get his groove back in the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, a 3-3 road trip against two teams who are over .500.   If that’s as bad as it gets, I’ll take it!  That trip would have felt a lot worse if we hadn’t come back to win yesterday.   But we did.  That calms the nerves quite a bit.  

The offense has been spotty for sure of late, but I was glad to see Ramon waking up and more signs of Gunnar getting his act together.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So, a 3-3 road trip against two teams who are over .500.   If that’s as bad as it gets, I’ll take it!  That trip would have felt a lot worse if we hadn’t come back to win yesterday.   But we did.  That calms the nerves quite a bit.  

The offense has been spotty for sure of late, but I was glad to see Ramon waking up and more signs of Gunnar getting his act together.  
 

With the Jays coming up next week the addition of Irvin and Cowser could be interesting.  The O's have to consistently win series again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a sense of why we haven't gottent a clear explanation of Cedric Mullins' possibly return from injury? It's bizarre and pretty common practice for managers and GMs to at least give an estimate, even if it's a broad one. Why are they being so secretive? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

Does anyone have a sense of why we haven't gottent a clear explanation of Cedric Mullins' possibly return from injury? It's bizarre and pretty common practice for managers and GMs to at least give an estimate, even if it's a broad one. Why are they being so secretive? 

Elias tends to give out as little information as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...