Jump to content

And so itbegins


Ginger

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you spend it on passable SS/3B defense and a 417 slugging?

Do you spend it on a 1B with a 356 slugging?

You should be spending the first pick on the best player in that draft class.  An absolute stud isn't there every year.  Even you know this.

 

That being said I'm fine with the bat but I'm disappointed in the glove this year.  I think the number of games he's playing is a factor.

 

We may not have taken the best player. We don’t know that yet. 
 

People think careers are defined in a few seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s hilarious.  I’ll take ten years exactly like this one and thank God every day that we drafted Adley no. 1.   I’m not saying he can’t get better — I expect he will — but if “all” he does is produce 5 WAR/yr. at C I’ll take that any day of the week.  The guy has just a few weeks more than a year in the majors and he’s already outproduced 21 of the 54 1:1’s who preceded him.  He’s got a pretty good chance to be one of the top five 1:1 picks of all time, without doing anything more than he’s doing right now.  

I believe you felt he was going to be a 7+ WAR, MVP level player.

So now, you are going to be ok with settling on him being a lesser player a few months later.

Also, you are confusing things. There are 2 different conversations now.

Conversation 1:  are you happy with a 5 WAR player?  The answer is obviously yes.

Conversation 2: Is that enough and is that the impact we were expecting?

I was EXPECTING him to be a lot more this year. I said a few months ago that anything under 6 WAR would be disappointing to me. Now, you may think that’s absurd (even though you felt he would be as good as I felt) but that’s because you have been a fan of a team that doesn’t normally have an elite player in it.

This is his prime. I don’t expect him to be at the level 5+ years from now and I would be ecstatic to get an average of 5 WAR over his career. However, if he is “just a 5 WAR” player now, what’s he going to be in 3-4 years?

And then enter into this the continuing should we extend him conversation.

And btw, he’s on a 4.5 WAR pace. 

Im not unhappy With Adley..but I am disappointed at the defense and the lack of power. The BA/OBP is great. But he needs to be more than that imo.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

We may not have taken the best player. We don’t know that yet. 
 

People think careers are defined in a few seasons.

Of course we don’t know that.  We do know we drafted a very good player.  

For the record, I have really been impressed with Bobby Witt when I’ve seen him. He’s only been worth 1.3 rWAR so far, but he has a lot of tools and I could see him exploding.

Corbin Carroll was drafted 1:16 out of High School that year and he’s looking like the NL rookie of the year right now.  3.8 rWAR already in his career.  

Lots of other talent in that class and maybe a player or two will turn out to be better than Adley.  But Adley was the surest bet on the board, had a very high ceiling and floor, and is living up to the hype. 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I believe you felt he was going to be a 7+ WAR, MVP level player.

So now, you are going to be ok with settling on him being a lesser player a few months later.

Also, you are confusing things. There are 2 different conversations now.

Conversation 1:  are you happy with a 5 WAR player?  The answer is obviously yes.

Conversation 2: Is that enough and is that the impact we were expecting?

I was EXPECTING him to be a lot more this year. I said a few months ago that anything under 6 WAR would be disappointing to me. Now, you may think that’s absurd (even though you felt he would be as good as I felt) but that’s because you have been a fan of a team that doesn’t normally have an elite player in it.

This is his prime. I don’t expect him to be at the level 5+ years from now and I would be ecstatic to get an average of 5 WAR over his career. However, if he is “just a 5 WAR” player now, what’s he going to be in 3-4 years?

And then enter into this the continuing should we extend him conversation.

And btw, he’s on a 4.5 WAR pace. 

Im not unhappy With Adley..but I am disappointed at the defense and the lack of power. The BA/OBP is great. But he needs to be more than that imo.

As to my expectations, it depends when you’re talking about.  When we drafted him, I was hoping he could be a 5 WAR/yr player.  He’s living up to that and I’m more than happy with his production. 

Based on last year, when he was worth 5.2 rWAR in 3/4 of a season and played at an 8 WAR pace after his initial month, I did think he had a good shot at being a 7-8 WAR player this year.   But it’s not the offense that’s holding him back from that. So, I’m not disappointed in his offense.  As to his defense, I’d say I’m a little disappointed this year so far.  A better word might be puzzled.  

Bottom line, the team has been winning since the day Adley arrived and it’s winning more often last year than this one.  Adley is the biggest reason that’s happened.  So no, I’m not disappointed.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

As to my expectations, it depends when you’re talking about.  When we drafted him, I was hoping he could be a 5 WAR/yr player.  He’s living up to that and I’m more than happy with his production. 

Based on last year, when he was worth 5.2 rWAR in 3/4 of a season and played at an 8 WAR pace after his initial month, I did think he had a good shot at being a 7-8 WAR player this year.   But it’s not the offense that’s holding him back from that. So, I’m not disappointed in his offense.  As to his defense, I’d say I’m a little disappointed this year so far.  A better word might be puzzled.  

Bottom line, the team has been winning since the day Adley arrived and it’s winning more often last year than this one.  Adley is the biggest reason that’s happened.  So no, I’m not disappointed.  

 

Well now you are just moving the goalposts w/r/t Adley but fair enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/7/2023 at 10:21 PM, Ginger said:

Mediocre starters. Stinko infield. Weiters revisited.  Middling middle  relievers. Not a star in sight. Blah. Blah. Blah. I’m going to bed.

Stay in bed.   We haven't lost since you posted this.

  • Upvote 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adley Rutschman has more ABs than any catcher in baseball this year (just ahead of Salvador Perez).  Even though about 25% of those ABs have come as a DH or PH, it seems like he needs a bit more rest.  It's the toughest position in baseball, and he's playing more than just about any other catcher even though he hasn't played a full season in the bigs yet. 

It seems like most top catchers are a bit cooler at the plate this year.  Sean Murphy is the only starting catcher that is really raking right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/9/2023 at 9:05 AM, Sports Guy said:

The thing is, people want to comp him to catchers. We need to comp him to just elite players overall.

Thats what we need him to be. Elite. That’s what you drafted him for. You didn’t draft him to be a very good player. You drafted him to be THE foundational piece for the franchise. 

That’s the ability and talent level he has.

Good but not great C defense and a 430 slugging isn’t that guy. That’s not what you spend the first pick on.

 

Disagree here, you draft him first overall to be elite at his position. If he's the 1st or 2nd best catcher in all of baseball, that's a home run of a pick, and a foundational piece of any franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, deward said:

Disagree here, you draft him first overall to be elite at his position. If he's the 1st or 2nd best catcher in all of baseball, that's a home run of a pick, and a foundational piece of any franchise.

Here we go again with the relative value for catchers question. It remains a puzzle. On the one hand, if your catcher outperforms everyone else's catcher, that's a big advantage. On the other hand, having a top catcher you lose a significant chunk of playing time at the position (for rest, and also career longevity) compared to investing your #1 at another position. I have yet to see anyone make sense of this tradeoff in any objective/statistical way. 

PS. All of that said, there is also the subjective dimension to consider: framing, pitch calling, hugs, leadership, clubhouse, charisma, winning juju, captainamericaness, etc. 

Edited by now
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

God some people are terrible fans. Adley is a franchise catcher. Is he as good as Johnny Bench? Hell no. Is he as good as Buster Posey or Joe Mauer? Nope. Is he one of the best catchers in the MLB and a championship quality player to build around? You bet your ass he is. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr-splash said:

God some people are terrible fans. Adley is a franchise catcher. Is he as good as Johnny Bench? Hell no. Is he as good as Buster Posey or Joe Mauer? Nope. Is he one of the best catchers in the MLB and a championship quality player to build around? You bet your ass he is. 

 

 


I do believe SG wants to be looked at as someone who has original thoughts. 
 

Is anyone, anywhere saying they’re disappointed in Adley? No. 
 

But SG is. And that makes him a rebel of sorts, if you will. A contrarian. Someone who “can think outside the box” because he’s on a different plane than the rest of us. 
 

Adley’s just fine. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will come a time when they won't need his bat in the lineup everyday.  They will have Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, Kjerstad to lean on.  When that  day comes, and he is not expected to carry the weight of the entire organization on his shoulders, then we may appreciate him more and not pick at every imperfection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I always take a look at this thread.  It's a great gauge for seeing our team's consistency.
    • He's looked much better of late, thankfully. 
    • We tried to get Cease from them at the deadline, and then in the offseason. Cease was much less complicated because he didn’t have innings issues and hadn’t been a reliever.  Now we have to make a trade with them with the complications of Crochet and expect not to trade one of Basallo, Mayo, and Holliday, plus.  Yeah, that ain’t happening. Stick to the rentals of Scherzer and Kikuchi. I know it’s taboo to say this, but once you get passed those two SP, who really is that much better than Suarez?  Suarez has only given up 3 HR all year and has a 2.50 ERA. 
    • Not really. What SP are you taking off for him?   It seems like our guys reached some theoretical milestones of being an all star but they did a 2-3 deep at each position. Picked the players based solely on that position and not versus the entire position group. For Ex. It was DH v DH. 2B v 2B. COF v COF.  The only gripes are possibly, Westburg vs Peredes but the one player from each team rule.  Santander vs OF but they need guys that can play CF.  Kimbrel vs Holmes maybe here but Kimbrel getting demoted and not spreading out his rough outings affected perception.  Do they still do the last player in vote?  If so, Santa and Westburg could be on the ballot?
    • Well the NFL Rams franchise deserves some mention as they started in Cleveland in 1937, moved to LA in 1946, moved to St. Louis in 1995 and back to LA in 2016.  Fascinating that in each stop they have won a season’s ultimate prize (either NFL championship or Super Bowl)! To add some extra spice to the Rams franchise history they were involved with the Baltimore Colts in what was the largest trade of all time as described here. https://www.nfl.com/news/sidelines/digging-into-the-colts-and-rams-1972-franchise-swap-was-the-greatest-biggest-tra
    • I still say crochet isn’t traded. It makes sense for Chicago to trade him but they could still get a ton for him in the offseason or at the deadline next year if things go right. I do not feel his value is at its peak right now BUT his value does risk to take a huge drop if they don’t trade him. It’s not an easy spot to be in for anyone involved in this decision.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...