Jump to content

Ryan O'Hearn has to start


Mr-splash

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, deward said:

O'Hearn isn't that young, and KC gave him plenty of ABs to establish himself. He's probably not very good, just hot at the moment. 

The change of scenery thing is real. Look at the Orioles who struggled mightily and left and had good careers…..Gausman, Arrieta, need I go on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

The change of scenery thing is real. Look at the Orioles who struggled mightily and left and had good careers…..Gausman, Arrieta, need I go on?

Bit different with pitchers, no? Also, was O'Hearn ever regarded as talented as those two (Gausman, Arrieta), whose talent was always unquestionable? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Flash- bd said:

Bit different with pitchers, no? Also, was O'Hearn ever regarded as talented as those two (Gausman, Arrieta), whose talent was always unquestionable? 

Man... are you gonna make me figure out how to spell Yastrzemski...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheekiness aside, I think we're talking about anomalies here with these names, and that the most likely case for O'Hearn is a regression to historical numbers. Maybe I'm wrong in pointing out the differences between him and Gausman and Arrieta but it does feel like there is something there...was O'Hearn ever considered a big talent? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Flash- bd said:

Cheekiness aside, I think we're talking about anomalies here with these names, and that the most likely case for O'Hearn is a regression to historical numbers. Maybe I'm wrong in pointing out the differences between him and Gausman and Arrieta but it does feel like there is something there...was O'Hearn ever considered a big talent? 

I think that O'Hearn is delivering some pretty awesome performance....  as is Hicks.

But I think it's likely that he will regress to career norms... As did Mateo... and as did Frazier who were also on pretty amazing tears.

Every once in a blue moon, a player will have something click..  and become a long term powerhouse where he wasn't before. But this isn't all that common since the steroid era ended.

Edited by owknows
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Flash- bd said:

Cheekiness aside, I think we're talking about anomalies here with these names, and that the most likely case for O'Hearn is a regression to historical numbers. Maybe I'm wrong in pointing out the differences between him and Gausman and Arrieta but it does feel like there is something there...was O'Hearn ever considered a big talent? 

You mean this Ryan O'Hearn, who spent 5 years in KC with max 328 ABs (2019), with PT declining over the 5 years, who we got for nothing and some here want to START on a team with playoff aspirations who has this career line??????? Regression to mean as pitchers catch up tp him seems most likely.

.226 .299 .403 .702
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, owknows said:

I think that O'Hearn is delivering some pretty awesome performance....  as is Hicks.

But I think it's likely that he will regress to career norms... As did Mateo... and as did Frazier who were also on pretty amazing tears.

Every once in a blue moon, a player will have something click..  and become a long term powerhouse where he wasn't before. But this isn't all that common since the steroid era ended.

O'Hearn's got a .990 OPS in 71 PA's , I say ride the hot hand. Sorry, Mounty.

And it could end as suddenly as Mateos' dramatic regression. I dont remember Frazier's amazing tear. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jabba72 said:

O'Hearn's got a .990 OPS in 71 PA's , I say ride the hot hand. Sorry, Mounty.

And it could end as suddenly as Mateos' dramatic regression. I dont remember Frazier's amazing tear. 

 

 

The thing about hot hands is you never know when they are going to cool off.

I think it's easy to stick with someone that was hot and is now struggling since you remember the hot.  Mateo might be an example of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

You mean this Ryan O'Hearn, who spent 5 years in KC with max 328 ABs (2019), with PT declining over the 5 years, who we got for nothing and some here want to START on a team with playoff aspirations who has this career line??????? Regression to mean as pitchers catch up tp him seems most likely.

.226 .299 .403 .702

Probably true as O'Hearn only has a .736 OPS career against RHP. Not exactly eye opening, which makes me wonder what Elias saw with him. 

Split G GS PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB ROE BAbip tOPS+
  vs RHP 354   974 872 96 205 41 5 39 137 0 1 90 251 .235 .308 .428 .736
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

O'Hearn's got a .990 OPS in 71 PA's , I say ride the hot hand. Sorry, Mounty

Hard not to agree.

Quote

And it could end as suddenly as Mateos' dramatic regression. I dont remember Frazier's amazing tear. 

Frazier was hot out of the gate (carried an OPS in the mid .800s through his first 35 PA's)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

Probably true as O'Hearn only has a .736 OPS career against RHP. Not exactly eye opening, which makes me wonder what Elias saw with him. 

Split G GS PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS TB GDP HBP SH SF IBB ROE BAbip tOPS+
  vs RHP 354   974 872 96 205 41 5 39 137 0 1 90 251 .235 .308 .428 .736

Elias has been picking up guy with ML experience who get DFA since the start.  It's good for filling out the roster for a low price without having to reach into the prospect pool.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Elias has been picking up guy with ML experience who get DFA since the start.  It's for filling out the roster for a low price without having to reach into the prospect pool.

Oh ok, well its working for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...