Jump to content

Friday June 16: an afternoon at Wrigley Field


SteveA

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Cause it's awesome watching this team without him.

I guess you hit the head when Mateo is up?

Cause that's about as pretty as your mom.

 

And yes I know he had a hit last inning, Mountcastle gets the occasional hit as well.

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad Hyde had the quick hook on Irvin. Absolute garbage inning getting jacked up w those HRs

Thankfully we came back and are in this game. Take no chances and bring in Baumann 

When can Grod come back up?

Irvin not looking like a good Elias move right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Alasdaire said:

Watching how Cole Irvin has turned out does not exactly have me itching to send an even bigger package of prospects away for another "dependable" starter.

We have enough prospects.  We don’t have enough starting pitching. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I guess you hit the head when Mateo is up?

Cause that's about as pretty as your mom.

I don't mind watching Mateo suffer at the plate because I know he can pick it in the field at SS.  Makes him tolerable.

A "your mom" joke is about as original from you as your hipster taste in music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I don't mind watching Mateo suffer at the plate because I know he can pick it in the field at SS.  Makes him tolerable.

A "your mom" joke is about as original from you as your hipster taste in music.

Wasn't going for original, much like your taste in music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

The differences are numerous.

  1. Can be younger
  2. Can be less expensive
  3. Eliminates the possibility of choice from the player
  4. Can be a shorter duration commitment

It makes no sense at all to just mention free agents that under performed as a reason to not trade for someone.

The sense is:

  1. The cost of starting pitching is high whether in terms of money spent or prospects traded.
  2. Pitchers are notoriously prone to serious injuries and liable to fall off for various other reasons.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to how much risk is worth taking and which route is practical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alasdaire said:

The sense is:

  1. The cost of starting pitching is high whether in terms of money spent or prospects traded.
  2. Pitchers are notoriously prone to serious injuries and liable to fall off for various other reasons.

Reasonable minds can disagree as to how much risk is worth taking and which route is practical.

Cost is relative.

If I have a lot more of something than I need it isn't "expensive" for me to give some of it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteveA said:

So what was it, a bloop that the runner on first had to hold up on and it dropped right in front of Santander and he threw to 2nd for the force?

Degree of difficulty?

Santander sprang on ball and threw a strike to second.  After he missed the ball he made a pretty difficult play.  It looked pretty. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

So what was it, a bloop that the runner on first had to hold up on and it dropped right in front of Santander and he threw to 2nd for the force?

Degree of difficulty?

Tony feet first slid and it hit his glove. Picked it up and threw to second. Easily thrown out. Degree of difficulty to catch...5/10?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...