Jump to content

Mike Elias Interview Takeaways


Billy F-Face3

Recommended Posts

Be ready for a Rich Hill type starter "to eat innings" and a decent A's reliever that doesn't cost much. I don't think i'd be mad about it. Time can change that yet, if the Rays fall on their face the next couple weeks and we jump past them by a few games i can see that opinion changing fast. -- It would be different if a team like the Brewers was out of it and trading top prospects could land a Burnes but the sellers now have little to offer in terms of non-2-3 month rentals, rentals which i dont see Elias trading away any substantial prospect for. 

I also believe we will have a couple small deals that are "sell" deals for project/mid-level prospects, trading Mateo possibly Hicks.

Hopefully our division opponents go overpay for barely above average rentals though. 

Wasn't Elias goal to make the playoffs? I wish they'd of asked him if that changed to making it and winning a playoff series. The experience alone helps the young core, I hope they get to play in a home playoff series this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

 

  • Going to go with this group of position players as long as they can before needing some fresh pitching. (This could be code for 'We're looking for a trade.')

No. I think it’s code for, as long as starters continue to go deep into games, and the bullpen isn’t getting taxed, they will carry an extra bat.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

If that's the case I wouldn't temper expectations for players coming back to the O's

Yes, if the expectation is acquiring good players with several years of control or under a reasonable contract that would cost a lot.

Expiring contracts/salary dumps even for very good players usually can be had for maybe a fringe top ten org prospect and some lottery tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IPlayGM said:

His name will be Grayson.

I’m with you, I think it’s bullpen arms, potentially multiple.

Grayson……and John.   They will 100% add bullpen arms.  Means, Bradish, Grayson in playoffs with Wells & Kremer as a backup is fine by me.  (Assuming Grayson & Means are performing to their talent level).  Means coming back healthy and productive is the ultimate trump card.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

Grayson……and John.   They will 100% add bullpen arms.  Means, Bradish, Grayson in playoffs with Wells & Kremer as a backup is fine by me.  (Assuming Grayson & Means are performing to their talent level).  Means coming back healthy and productive is the ultimate trump card.  

What if the bullpen arms are actually... GRod and Means?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, geschinger said:

Yes, if the expectation is acquiring good players with several years of control or under a reasonable contract that would cost a lot.

Expiring contracts/salary dumps even for very good players usually can be had for maybe a fringe top ten org prospect and some lottery tickets.

Yep and this is why I have been saying they will go the rental route in all likelihood.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

Judging by them never having pitched an inning of relief in their professional careers  I’d say “not likely”.

Unless... there was a need to limit innings or ease someone back after an extended injury. It wouldn't be the first time starting pitchers were added to the bullpen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...