Jump to content

Adam Frazier should not play in the field


Three Run Homer

Recommended Posts

Frazier is not a good second baseman any more and it cost the O'a big time tonight.  Westburg probably catches the pop up by Naylor in the 8th.   He probably gets to the ground ball by Giminez in the 8th that went for a single.  He might even have gotten to Ramirez' RBI single early in the game.  

I'm fine with Frazier pinch hitting depending on the matchup and situation, but he is getting too many starts at 2B.  Westburg is a world-class defender at 2B.  He should be out there most or all of the time.  

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Frazier is not a good second baseman any more and it cost the O'a big time tonight.  Westburg probably catches the pop up by Naylor in the 8th.   He probably gets to the ground ball by Giminez in the 8th that went for a single.  He might even have gotten to Ramirez' RBI single early in the game.  

I'm fine with Frazier pinch hitting depending on the matchup and situation, but he is getting too many starts at 2B.  Westburg is a world-class defender at 2B.  He should be out there most or all of the time.  

Frazier has been very bad this year at 2B, but last year he was at 6 OAA there, Jordan Westburg is at 0 OAA, world class hyperbole I assume?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Malike said:

Frazier has been very bad this year at 2B, but last year he was at 6 OAA there, Jordan Westburg is at 0 OAA, world class hyperbole I assume?

World class in comparison to Frazier maybe.  I'd classify Westburg as solid.  Not great or flashy,  but solid.  Frazier is bad and along with being an average at best hitter (I know,  I know he has the 'clutch' gene,  but I guess he left it home in the 9th tonight) he is starting way too much.   The defense is killing us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forphase1 said:

World class in comparison to Frazier maybe.  I'd classify Westburg as solid.  Not great or flashy,  but solid.  Frazier is bad and along with being an average at best hitter (I know,  I know he has the 'clutch' gene,  but I guess he left it home in the 9th tonight) he is starting way too much.   The defense is killing us. 

I never said he isn't starting too much, but calling a guy with 284 innings with 0 OAA and 0 RAA a world-class defender is hyperbole at it's finest. His range is fine, at least, but he's not making any outs above average. Frazier is much worse. This year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Malike said:

Frazier has been very bad this year at 2B, but last year he was at 6 OAA there, Jordan Westburg is at 0 OAA, world class hyperbole I assume?

Are you reading stats or are you watching the games?  Westburg has made plays this year that I've never seen a 2B make.  He is outstanding in the field.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Three Run Homer said:

Are you reading stats or are you watching the games?  Westburg has made plays this year that I've never seen a 2B make.  He is outstanding in the field.  

Ah, you should have said that in your opening post. I never would have replied.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not disagreeing but what was the catch probability on the RF pop fly hit? I’m guessing it was fairly low, like 5% or less.  Also didn’t help that Hicks was positioned well into the gap defensively and had all but zero chance to get to that ball. 

It was a lucky hit and about as poorly placed ball you could have, unless you’re a CLE fan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I'm seeing Westburg at 3 OAA, tied with Gunnar for 2nd on the team. We've seen him make tougher plays than that ball Frazier dropped.

Sure, but you're looking at his 3B playtime. Frazier doesn't play 3B so I thought it's only fair to compare the OAA at 2B which is 0.

image.thumb.png.462be5b822fb6ef7703dcb4dd2ddace6.png

Edited by Malike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not disagreeing with what appears to be one of the main contentions here, which is that Westburg’s combination of offense and defense (and future potential) warrants him playing almost every day at this point. 

But one of Urias, Mateo, and Frazier also has to play every day. There’s only two of Henderson and Westburg, and the rules seem to insist that we play three non-1B infielders at a time. 

The announcers were speculating yesterday that Urias might be nicked up in some way, perhaps leading to the string of really bad, really uncharacteristic defensive mistakes he’s made over the last week or so. If that’s the case, then your only options at present are to play banged up Urias (who has been a big problem defensively) or to choose between Mateo and Frazier. 

I’m actually fine with Mateo playing more, but the way folks rail against him ever starting against a RHP (and frankly, often even against LHPs), it sorta seems like Hyde is damned no matter which way he goes. I just don’t think it’s realistic to say that Frazier should never play, given the realities of the roster right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Malike said:

Frazier has been very bad this year at 2B, but last year he was at 6 OAA there, Jordan Westburg is at 0 OAA, world class hyperbole I assume?

Westburg is still positive overall as a defender per statcast OAA, and it's really hard to draw conclusions from 1/7 of a season of defensive stats.  He sure looks pretty good there though, and this isn't the first time this year that Frazier's unclutch defense has cost us games.  He is unquestionably the weakest link on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, scarey1999 said:

I’m not disagreeing but what was the catch probability on the RF pop fly hit? I’m guessing it was fairly low, like 5% or less.  Also didn’t help that Hicks was positioned well into the gap defensively and had all but zero chance to get to that ball. 

It was a lucky hit and about as poorly placed ball you could have, unless you’re a CLE fan. 

It also didn’t help that Hicks casually jogged for the ball. Hicks didn’t have to go much further than Frazier did to get to it and didn’t even come close.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Brian88 said:

It also didn’t help that Hicks casually jogged for the ball. Hicks didn’t have to go much further than Frazier did to get to it and didn’t even come close.

That play was on Hicks in my opinion, and the opinion of a friend with whom I was texting at the time.  That ball should easily have been in his range, and he had a much better shot at making a throw from his position than Frazier, who had no shot at a throw.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This Oriole team has much better talent.  Gunner Henderson, Jordan Westberg, Adley, Santander, Grayson, and Corbin Burnes don’t have a 4-32 streak in them.  Even if they fill the rest of the positions with OH posters.  I think a rotation of Burnes, Grayson, and Kremer as your top 3 is a better than 500 team the rest of the way at least.  The jury is out on Povich but if he pitches as well as he has the Orioles with this offense will have a good chance to win when he starts.  Is the team good enough to win it all?  They need help most likely.  One consistent starter and a couple of better arms in the bullpen.  This team is going to the playoffs.  To think they are not at this point is based on emotion and not anything else.  
    • It’s funny that people are wanting to bring back Tanner Scott and his 6.1 walk rate, but balking at McDermott and his 5.5 walk rate. I’m leery of McDermott too, but as they say, “any port in a storm,” so no reason not to give him a try.
    • It sort of makes no sense, his GB% is much higher than last year but his HR/FB went from 10% last year to 26% this year. Walks are way up too.
    • Suarez and Irvin were always going to regress. You didn’t think they would be sub 3 ERA pitchers did you?  Irvin is a solid guy for the back of the rotation but that’s what he is, a back of rotation guy. They are pieces you need to eat innings and keep you in most games but these aren’t world beaters on the mound. Suarez is a good story but there is a reason he has had the career he has had. The fear that we will slowly sink is an unfounded and irrational fear. The team has to get better and they have to improve on obvious needs but we don’t need to go overboard here.  All teams have holes they need to address.
    • Good point.  Every now and then he looks like vintage Cano from early last year but he’s no longer trustworthy.
    • Speaking of scar tissue, a review of our storied/checkered past shows an uglier picture than we like to recall... St. Louis Browns 1902-1953: 52 years, 1 WS (1944), loss. Baltimore Orioles 1954-1983: 30 years, 6 WS (3-3), plus 2 more ALCS losses. Orioles 1984-2023: 40 years, 6 playoffs losses (1 WC, 2 ALDS, 3 ALCS).
    • Cano is having an awful season. He's been worth -0.3 fWAR with a 4.62 FIP. I know you have to use the arms you have, but you can't utilize Cano like it's 2023, he's terrible and should be the lowest-leverage reliever out of the pen right now. He's carrying the same BABIP as last year, but his results are awful.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...