Jump to content

ALDS Game 2 - Revenge of the O's


86this

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

So: after seeing what it takes to win in the post session, what are our glaring needs?

Mine:

Bullpen help (at least 3 new guys that can pitch and throw strikes)

A new centerfielder.  I love Mullins, but I think it is time to move on from Mullins.  I don't think Hicks or Hays are the guy for that.  I also don't think anyone in the minors is ready to take over full time starting duties in center.  I think we need to find someone that can hit and get on base at a higher clip than Mullins in free agency. 

A third baseman that can hit to replace Urias.   Someone that brings some power from the right side of the plate.   Urias needs to go. 

Another starting pitcher

Another power hitting right handed bat that can DH and play a corner outfield position on occasion

 

I used to think we could fill these roles with guys in our system, but now I'm not sure.  

You might find better engaging conversation about that in the Orioles Hangout main Orioles forum section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Yossarian said:

So: after seeing what it takes to win in the post session, what are our glaring needs?

Mine:

Bullpen help (at least 3 new guys that can pitch and throw strikes)

A new centerfielder.  I love Mullins, but I think it is time to move on from Mullins.  I don't think Hicks or Hays are the guy for that.  I also don't think anyone in the minors is ready to take over full time starting duties in center.  I think we need to find someone that can hit and get on base at a higher clip than Mullins in free agency. 

A third baseman that can hit to replace Urias.   Someone that brings some power from the right side of the plate.   Urias needs to go. 

Another starting pitcher

Another power hitting right handed bat that can DH and play a corner outfield position on occasion

 

I used to think we could fill these roles with guys in our system, but now I'm not sure.  

I dunno. I kind of wonder if Mullins has never really been healthy the second half of this year. I think he’s more than good enough if we can get him right again. 

Maybe Holliday is the long term answer for leading off? 

And then you have Holliday play short and Henderson at third. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tntoriole said:

Sweep record will end too if we lose Tuesday.  I listened to the Lock On Rangers podcast on Friday as a preview and their guy just gushed about how great it would be to sweep, to win the ALDS but also to end that streak. 

Does post season count in that kind of record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

So: after seeing what it takes to win in the post session, what are our glaring needs?

Mine:

Bullpen help (at least 3 new guys that can pitch and throw strikes)

A new centerfielder.  I love Mullins, but I think it is time to move on from Mullins.  I don't think Hicks or Hays are the guy for that.  I also don't think anyone in the minors is ready to take over full time starting duties in center.  I think we need to find someone that can hit and get on base at a higher clip than Mullins in free agency. 

A third baseman that can hit to replace Urias.   Someone that brings some power from the right side of the plate.   Urias needs to go. 

Another starting pitcher

Another power hitting right handed bat that can DH and play a corner outfield position on occasion

 

I used to think we could fill these roles with guys in our system, but now I'm not sure.  

Bullpen help is a must and it needs to be more than waiver wire fodder. The Orioles needed to do better than just Webb and Fuji as bullpen acquisitions. 

While I expect Perez and Coulombe to be decent next year they are not established guys. It’s very possible they regress and it’s the reason to bring in better talent. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...