Jump to content

Santander for Bieber


Sports Guy

Santander for Bieber  

86 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you trade Santander for Shane Bieber?

    • Yes
      53
    • No
      33


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Like when you said Santander was more valuable than Snell?

I said I didn't like Snell's risk profile.  I was right about it 2019-2022, and wrong about it 2018 and 2023.

Bieber isn't Snell.

So you're on the record then for Bieber being more valuable next year than Santander.  Duly noted.
Odds don't seem in your favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I said I didn't like Snell's risk profile.  I was right about it 2019-2022, and wrong about it 2018 and 2023.

Bieber isn't Snell.

So you're on the record then for Bieber being more valuable next year than Santander.  Duly noted.
Odds don't seem in your favor.

Last year was the first time that Santander had more WAR than Bieber and Bieber missed 1/3 of the season.  So, sure, if Bieber can’t pitch and Santander plays a full season odds are in Santander’s favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

That’s a risk.  He’s 28 and his fastball velocity was the same in 23 as 22.  Almost any pitcher available comes with some kind of risk.

You can't just dismiss risk with a generic "everything has risk" statement.  I could get hit by a bus tomorrow, I shouldn't start smoking cigarettes tonight.

This goes for @Sports Guy as well.

His K rate has almost HALVED since 2020.  HIs performance is basically going in one direction.  He missed time with an elbow injury this year in July.  He made two starts after that.  That's a lot of red flags.  They can't be ignored and just waved away as "everything has risk" just for the sake of doing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I said I didn't like Snell's risk profile.  I was right about it 2019-2022, and wrong about it 2018 and 2023.

Bieber isn't Snell.

So you're on the record then for Bieber being more valuable next year than Santander.  Duly noted.
Odds don't seem in your favor.

Well, you are completely wrong about his profile not being good 2019-2022. Literally nothing backs that up unless you want to ignore stats and performance.

I’m saying it’s an incredibly foolish statement to say it’s  an easy choice to say Santander will out produce him. There is no validity behind that statement.

That’s another way of saying it’s not even close…and sorry, but that’s really dumb.

Santander’s best season by fWAR is the equivalent Bieber’s worst full season.  So, unless Bieber is going to get hurt next year (and btw, even though it’s been better the last few years, AS doesn’t have a great history of health either), it’s very unlikely that Santander posts a higher WAR.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Last year was the first time that Santander had more WAR than Bieber and Bieber missed 1/3 of the season.  So, sure, if Bieber can’t pitch and Santander plays a full season odds are in Santander’s favor.

He pitched 11 innings in the second half last year.  It's a fair question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Well, you are completely wrong about his profile not being good 2019-2022. Literally nothing backs that up unless you want to ignore stats and performance.

I’m saying it’s an incredibly foolish statement to say it’s  an easy choice to say Santander will out produce him. There is no validity behind that statement.

That’s another way of saying it’s not even close…and sorry, but that’s really dumb.

Santander’s best season by fWAR is the equivalent Bieber’s worst full season.  So, unless Bieber is going to get hurt next year (and btw, even though it’s been better the last few years, AS doesn’t have a great history of health either), it’s very unlikely that Santander posts a higher WAR.

 

Snell was extremely mediocre from 2019-2022.  Either you don't understand what I'm saying, or you don't know Snell's career.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

You can't just dismiss risk with a generic "everything has risk" statement.  I could get hit by a bus tomorrow, I shouldn't start smoking cigarettes tonight.

This goes for @Sports Guy as well.

His K rate has almost HALVED since 2020.  HIs performance is basically going in one direction.  He missed time with an elbow injury this year in July.  He made two starts after that.  That's a lot of red flags.  They can't be ignored and just waved away as "everything has risk" just for the sake of doing something.

So to be clear, if we wake up tomorrow and this deal happens, you will feel Elias made a huge mistake and is wrong for making the trade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pickles said:

Snell was extremely mediocre from 2019-2022.  Either you don't understand what I'm saying, or you don't know Snell's career.

 

Taking out 2020 (ie not a full season), Snell averaged a 2.8 fWAR.  In that time frame, the WORST K rate he had was 11.3. The worst FIP he had was 3.8 and he had 2 other years where the FIP was under 3.35.

His 2021 ERA+ was only 92, but it was 103, 127 and 112 the other 3 years.

His swingstr% was great and he had a lot of great statcast numbers for those years.

So, calling him mediocre is both foolish and factually wrong unless being above average or better is your definition of mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

He pitched 11 innings in the second half last year.  It's a fair question.

Fair question.  Those 11 innings came at the end of the season.  I’m assuming he’s healthy heading into 2024.  I’m sure the O’s would perform due diligence.  No guarantees in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Grichuk really bounced back last year. He would be great as RH OF/DH to play against LHP. Really need to find a bat like that because we’re so lefty dominant. Losing Santander will only add to that. 
    • I think that was very true for a lot of years. Too many, really. But I feel like things might have changed this year with the fanbase, as I think the last three and a half months really ripped the shine off of just about everyone and everything associated with the Orioles. I think the attendance at these playoff games and the intensity of the crowd (just based on what I saw on TV and comparing it to 2012 and 2014) reflected how fans felt about the product this year. Even the tone of this board feels different, and I am glad to see it. I don't think people are celebrating regular season win totals like they did in the past, or thinking not being swept in the regular season was ever cool when they got ousted in 3 by Texas when it counted, or having blind faith in Elias. If anything, I think the patience with Elias, Hyde, the coaches, and the players has finally run thin. Hopefully there are no more age excuses for Holliday when we have seen what the other young Jacksons in the majors look like, or Adley when we have seen what a much older and bigger Sal Perez is capable of, or any of our hitters who all came up so small in big moments. And after seeing how active Kansas City was last offseason even on the heels of a 106 loss team, there should be absolutely no excuses centered on small market or budgets. There will be injuries in 2025 like there are every year, but the players who are on the field and healthy need to step up.
    • Gotcha.    At times they do things that bother me. In 2014 they created different season plans pushing playoff tickets then they abandoned them. The moment they win some they act like they have been perennial champs.    They are running a business, I understand that. I get trying to leverage success on the field but they misjudge the market and get greedy. The WC prices were too high. The bottom line is they have not had enough consistent success in this market to act the way they do. This isn’t the early 90’s with no Ravens and Nationals. 
    • I disliked it for aesthetic reasons. Still do.
    • I guess I'm just not as in tune with the subtext emanating from an individual I've never actually met as you are. I'm also not as good at analyzing a player's body language as the experts in the game threads.
    • I was in favor of it. I am now in favor of a middle ground. 
    • They could add some special custom seating instead of simply bringing back what they had before.  Some sort of outfield luxury box deal.  Might be a novel addition to the park.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...