Jump to content

Do the 2024 Orioles need to score more runs than the team did in 2023?


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I have no problem with Urias and Mateo but I’d like to see Henderson, and two other young guys as the starters.   O’Hearn is going to have to earn playing time just like last year.

How much will he have to earn? My guess he is the opening day DH or 1B  and I would bet they give him a long leash because of last year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

How much will he have to earn? My guess he is the opening day DH or 1B  and I would bet they give him a long leash because of last year. 

Unfortunately I think you’re correct about OHearn. Everything about how this team operates says he’s penciled in for one of the DH/1B spots in the lineup. They’ll keep Cowser and Kjerstad on the bench and/or in Norfolk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

How much will he have to earn? My guess he is the opening day DH or 1B  and I would bet they give him a long leash because of last year. 

Right now, I’d say you’re right but with Kjerstad, Cowser, and even Hilliard around those three are all threats to O’Hearn.  So, something could happen with Santander or O’Hearn, otherwise I don’t see how those guys can get serious AB’s with the current team construction.

If O’Hearn doesn’t hit, I don’t think the leash is that long.  He’ll start losing AB’s pretty quick as long as Kjerstad or Cowser is on the 26 man.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, now said:

Agree on characterizing Mateo and Urias (and Mounty and Hays for that matter) as experienced "depth" at this point. Disagree that having impact bats "at times" warrants much playing time, or that trading them is "horrible" or a "whim." On the contrary, I think it's prime time to trade them (tho not necessarily all 4) at their peak value for our greater need, pitching.

My comment was about losing their depth by dropping the players on a whim. As backup/utility players with a total of 2.6 bwar in 2023, you do not just drop veteran experience with good defense to play a bunch of rookie prospects. It’s a bad idea!

Edited by Since1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Since1984 said:

My comment was about losing their depth by dropping the players on a whim. As backup/utility players with a total of 2.6 bwar in 2023, you do not just drop veteran experience with good defense to play a bunch of rookie prospects. It’s a bad idea!

I think holding on to aging backups when you have ML ready prospects in the pipeline is a bad idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think holding on to aging backups when you have ML ready prospects in the pipeline is a bad idea.

 

Technically, Jackson Holliday is aging as we all are each day.   Urias is 29.  Mateo is 28.  I’d like nothing better to see Westburg and Ortiz in the starting infield to start the season.  In all likelihood Mayo and Holliday start in Norfolk.  I have no problem with Mateo and Urias on the bench in that scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Technically, Jackson Holliday is aging as we all are each day.   Urias is 29.  Mateo is 28.  I’d like nothing better to see Westburg and Ortiz in the starting infield to start the season.  In all likelihood Mayo and Holliday start in Norfolk.  I have no problem with Mateo and Urias on the bench in that scenario.

Mateo or Urias on the bench.   Not both IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Who is the main DH and the 4 man bench.  I know you predicted Ortiz at 3rd so I assume Gunnar at SS and Westburg at 2B.

DH - Adley, Mountcastle, O'Hearn. Gunnar or Santander when they need to get off their feet.  Kjerstad  at some point in the year.

Bench:  McCann, Mateo, Cowser.   The 4th could be Kjerstad or Hilliard or McKenna.    Depends on how Cowser looks defensively especially in center.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

We need a big reliable slugger against left handed pitching... especially with runners in scoring position.

We really don't. Kjerstad had a .333 AVG / .588 SLG against left handed pitching in the minors last season. Give him regular ABs and he's very likely to be our "big reliable slugger". Is there risk involved in banking on someone like him (i.e., limited MLB experience)? Of course, but Elias and ownership mad a conscious decision six years ago to rebuild the team from withink with a focus on young hitting prospects. And it would be foolish to abandon that strategy now given the early success of players like Rutschman and Henderson (i.e., it seems to be working). If anything the team should be trading offensive players away (to make room for the younger players) not adding them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

DH - Adley, Mountcastle, O'Hearn. Gunnar or Santander when they need to get off their feet.

Bench:  McCann, Mateo, Cowser.   The 4th could be Kjerstad or Hilliard or McKenna.    Depends on how Cowser looks defensively especially in center.

I can’t see a bench with two of Cowser/Hilliard/Kjerstad AND O’Hearn being on the team.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I have not seen any reports of a limit on the number of qualifying offers a team can make.   I disagree that Santander is unlikely to receive a QO, or that he will accept it if he gets one.  Of course, it depends how the rest of his season plays out.  But I’ve been on record that if Santander has a season as good as the last two (120/121 OPS+), he should get a QO and will turn it down.  Right now he’s at 131 OPS+, so we’ll see how it goes from here.  
    • I was curious how GRod would pitch given that huge crowd and electric atmosphere. I feel like he has a tendency to get too amped up and overthrow. Granted I didn’t start watching until inning 3, but he looked absolutely in control and executed his pitches.  Certainly a big step forward as far as I’m concerned.
    • Unless Santander goes on an absolute tear the rest of the season, I don't think he turns down a qualifying offer. And even then, it'd be real easy to look at FA deals for 30-ish year old outfielders who are good regulars but not stars and realize there's a good chance he won't beat a QO in guaranteed money, especially with a QO attached. As much as I'd like the pick, I don't want to gamble 20-30M and another year of stunted opportunity for our young outfielders on Santander turning down a QO.
    • Yeah, it's getting to the point where I'm not going to cry if McDermott finishes the year in AAA. I'm not against bringing him up necessarily, but he's clearly got more work to do on control/command if he wants to be a good major league starter long-term.
    • Are there any other qualifications other than signing a contract for 50+M?  A contract of that value spread over 3-4 years would give him a raise and make other teams give some consideration to sign him.  I think that's the only way a QO would work for him.  But I don't think they put him in jeopardy - altho the Orioles could match an offer, I suppose.  I think they value him pretty highly even if he won't command top money. 
    • I did say "unlikely" before "no matter what." Now that I re-read that though, it's kind of a bizarre sentence so I can see why you interpreted it that way. Of course there's a shot a player taken at 1-22 succeeds. Elias is certainly above average at drafting, possibly well above average, but the odds are still against him here, as they are for pretty much any individual pick he makes. I'm not trying to knock Elias here, just stating the fact that the vast majority of players selected in the back of the first round don't turn into solid regulars and so you shouldn't pass up someone you think is more likely to succeed here to draft "for need." I'm certain someone who will be available at this pick will have an incredible major league career. The odds are against it being whoever we draft though. That's just math.
    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...