Jump to content

Bloomberg: Carlyle Group/David Rubenstein In Talks To Purchase Orioles


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Going Underground said:

Depends if Peter is the sole owner or if his wife is a joint tenant of the asset. Joint tenancy would only be a 50% bump up .

Peter probably owns ~65% stake with John/Lou combining for another 4-5%.  

Peter’s basis is probably less than $60MM — way less than $173MM because only ~$85MM was put up in cash with the rest financed.  

Peter originally put up $43MM to take a 51% stake as the general partner.  He then bought the 9% stake of DeWitt, Mercer Reynolds, and Robert Castellini for about $4.1MM in 1995.  

The Angelos family has upped its total share to ~69-70% by buying LP shares of Steve Geppi (largest chunk at ~4.5%), Jim McKay, Roger Blunt, Edward Brush, and John Castor.  We know John/Lou now have a stake so I’m guessing these incremental purchases were split between Peter and the sons.

All of Peter’s Orioles shares were transferred into the Peter G. Angelos Revokable Trust in late 2020.  Georgia, John, and Lou are co-trustees.  

Upon Peter’s death, the Orioles shares are to be distributed from the PA Trust to Marital Trust B for the benefit of Georgia during her life. Upon her death, any unsold Orioles shares are to be split equally between John and Lou.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

 

Really conflicted on this one. The more I read about him the more concerns I have. I didn’t know about the council of foreign relations until yesterday. It’s hard to find on the internet now but Jeffrey Epstein was a member up until 2009. He also made a donation 2019 to them. Guess who the chairman there is?

 

I know it will be a conspiracy thought but I think it’s important to look into future owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

Really conflicted on this one. The more I read about him the more concerns I have. I didn’t know about the council of foreign relations until yesterday. It’s hard to find on the internet now but Jeffrey Epstein was a member up until 2009. He also made a donation 2019 to them. Guess who the chairman there is?

 

I know it will be a conspiracy thought but I think it’s important to look into future owner.

The Council of Foreign Relations is a pretty significant American think tank. Rubenstein's position is indicative of how enmeshed he is in society's elite establishment/upper class. Some people I'm sure have a problem with that, I don't, but to each their own. The list of prominent people involved in the CFR over the years is extensive; Jeffrey Epstein having a membership in the CFR and making contributions isn't indicative of anything with regards to the current Chairman in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScGO's said:

Does the new lease seem advantageous for preparing a sale of the team? Can this hypothetically get done before the season? Or are there any more road blocks? (Besides John Angelos ego)

There was some talk in various threads about the huge hold-ups to a sale being:

1. Peter passing away
2. The MASN O's/Nats deal
3. The stadium lease

Two of the three were basically solved, or at least found a steady state for #2, in the last few weeks. I feel like there was a 4th issue that was also solved, but I can't remember. Either way, at this point it seems like JA has this tee'd up and ready for a sale when the time comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

Shhhh, don't tell Pickles.  He's worried that Rubenstein could die in 10 years and we'd have to go through this all over again.

Ha. If there's one thing I've learned reading this message board over the years is people hate process. It freaks them out. It can be a rebuild. Labor strife. Ownership changes. Free agent negotiations. Trade negotiations. Stadium lease negotiations.

Basically anything that involves a negotiation is often met with people getting angry at the greedy people involved on either side. It's like there's no awareness whatsoever that negotiations are part of a process which is usually motivated by some kind of deadline. 95% of the public stuff that is released before the deadlines are part of the process, and usually meaningless. 

I'm not saying negotiations don't go south. I'm just saying that people freak out over the wrong headlines. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

The Council of Foreign Relations is a pretty significant American think tank. Rubenstein's position is indicative of how enmeshed he is in society's elite establishment/upper class. Some people I'm sure have a problem with that, I don't, but to each their own. The list of prominent people involved in the CFR over the years is extensive; Jeffrey Epstein having a membership in the CFR and making contributions isn't indicative of anything with regards to the current Chairman in my opinion. 

I agree 100%.   If you are going to tar an entire organization because they once had one bad apple who did bad things completely unrelated to his work at the organization, you’re going to eliminate any organization of more than 100 people that’s been in existence for more than a decade.   

I have a friend who spent a couple of years at the Council of Foreign Relations.  Before that, she was a staffer for a US Senator, the General Counsel of the US Trade representative, a Commissioner at the World Trade Organization, and a professor of International Law at Georgetown.  But I guess I’d better write her off since Jeffrey Epstein was once at CFR.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

The Council of Foreign Relations is a pretty significant American think tank. Rubenstein's position is indicative of how enmeshed he is in society's elite establishment/upper class. Some people I'm sure have a problem with that, I don't, but to each their own. The list of prominent people involved in the CFR over the years is extensive; Jeffrey Epstein having a membership in the CFR and making contributions isn't indicative of anything with regards to the current Chairman in my opinion. 

As someone who's firmly entrenched in society's elite establishment/upper class, it doesn't bother me at all, too.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say the odds of Rubenstein purchasing control of the team is pretty slim, unfortunately.  It's a long process, there's a lot of hurdles, etc.

The one thing that is in his favor is that he seems to be an affable kind of guy, there are probably a lot of people that he could call on if he somehow needed financial assistance (he doesn't).  It doesn't seem like he's got a lot of enemies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I always compare where we are in attendance to payroll. As it stands our attendance will be 19th in the league and payroll 22nd. The Twins are at 19th with 130 million dollar payroll which is 22 million higher than ours. I expect the Nats and Tigers to spend a little this offseason so that 130 million mark for 19th place may move closer to 140. Still gives this team 50-60 million to spend on either resigning guys or free agents.
    • Well, the changes to the flex plans this year led both me ($1200 plan) and my friend ($2500 plan) to not renew for next year. The decision to more severely limit playoff presale access and dramatically reduce the discount on food and drinks at the park just didn’t make it worth it to tie up that much money in advance. So, we’ll likely go to far fewer games next year. Given the press reports and online reaction, I have to think we weren’t alone in our decision making. 
    • Rivera and Soto are hitting.   Holliday and Mayo are not.
    • Holliday could fill the role of pinch runner that Mateo would fill. 
    • Yeah. I don’t get that either. SEA would win head to head tie with HOU and push HOU into WC race but it’s irrelevant if the loses don’t match.  
    • Regardless of how down I've been about their recent play, there's always been some hope. Getting some guys back in time for the post season will definitely help.    The way this team has been built requires a group effort. I mean,  Gunnar is a huge star, but the lineup when healthy can be competitive top to bottom. I'm not knocking NY here, but if you can eliminate Judge(almost impossible), you stand a chance vs them. I'm not implying that they will go on a deep run because we've seen how bad it can be, but simply saying that getting healthy and having a shot is the best we as fans could have hoped for with the way this season has gone.
    • So who goes when Westburg and Urias come back?   My first cut is Jimenez.   The second is harder.    Liv Soto is the backup SS so I keep him.     Rivera is a good back up at 1B.   He is out of options.   Then there are  Holliday and Mayo.   Both have options. What's a GM to do?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...