Jump to content

Why Ryan O’Hearn Must Go (Sorry, Ryan)


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

Thinking about starting a thread about why O'Hearn has to stay.

Santander might be the one whose spot is vulnerable when Kjerstad is ready.  Not because of his slow start per se.........but more because of it being his walk year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Thinking about starting a thread about why O'Hearn has to stay.

Santander might be the one whose spot is vulnerable when Kjerstad is ready.  Not because of his slow start per se.........but more because of it being his walk year.

Lunacy. Santander will be hitting in the middle of the order for the Orioles in October of 2024. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Matt Bennett said:

Lunacy. Santander will be hitting in the middle of the order for the Orioles in October of 2024. 

Maybe.   I think "lunacy" is a tad overstated.  It wouldn't surprise me if Elias keeps everyone for sure.

Do you think Kjerstad will be in the lineup in October of 2024?   If so how do you expect them to make room for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Do you think Kjerstad will be in the lineup in October of 2024?   If so how do you expect them to make room for him?

Perhaps. I think, roster makeup wise, Kjerstad could fill in if any of Hays, Santander, O'Hearn, Mounty, Cowser, or Mullins got hurt. Kjerstad as a Mullins replacement (Cowser/Mateo/Hays to CF, Kjerstad to the corners/DH) is the stretchiest but it could still work. That's a very good insurance policy to have. Without injuries, having Santander/O'Hearn/Mounty/Cowser mash in MLB and Kjerstad mash in AAA is fine for 2024.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Maybe.   I think "lunacy" is a tad overstated.  It wouldn't surprise me if Elias keeps everyone for sure.

Do you think Kjerstad will be in the lineup in October of 2024?   If so how do you expect them to make room for him?

I don't think a definitive answer can be given regarding this question as there are so many factors that could effect this decision.

Kjerstad could be the one who is traded. Though I guess in many ways that decision is tied to the health and performance of Bradish and Means and if we need a starter around the deadline.

If Kjerstad is not dealt, it is unlikely that the Orioles simply "make room for him" if everyone in the lineup continues to perform well. However, if he is still on the roster after the deadline, I expect that the plan will be for either him or Mayo to replace Santander next season. 

If Westburg as anything close to this kind of player, then there is no probable path to Mayo displacing him on the grass. And O'Hearn is under contract for next year at a reasonable figure, it's probably not likely that he gets moved. Which would mean only one spot for Mayo/Kjerstad (Santander's).

Given how Elias has operated historically and his ultra conservative approach, it is unlikely that he "makes room for prospects" in the middle of a pennant race. He seems to have a penchant for preferring the more known quantity for as long as possible, over replacing that "known quantity" with an asset that has much more volatility. Just my 2 cents..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I don't think a definitive answer can be given regarding this question as there are so many factors that could effect this decision.

Kjerstad could be the one who is traded. Though I guess in many ways that decision is tied to the health and performance of Bradish and Means and if we need a starter around the deadline.

If Kjerstad is not dealt, it is unlikely that the Orioles simply "make room for him" if everyone in the lineup continues to perform well. However, if he is still on the roster after the deadline, I expect that the plan will be for either him or Mayo to replace Santander next season. 

If Westburg as anything close to this kind of player, then there is no probable path to Mayo displacing him on the grass. And O'Hearn is under contract for next year at a reasonable figure, it's probably not likely that he gets moved. Which would mean only one spot for Mayo/Kjerstad (Santander's).

Given how Elias has operated historically and his ultra conservative approach, it is unlikely that he "makes room for prospects" in the middle of a pennant race. He seems to have a penchant for preferring the more known quantity for as long as possible, over replacing that "known quantity" with an asset that has much more volatility. Just my 2 cents..

I actually agree with most of this.  It definitely seems to be in Elias's nature to hold onto guys as long as possible and to be extra sure that a prospect is dominating at a level before promoting them.

He also was on record recently as saying it does no one any good to let guys just mash in the minors for long periods of time.  So we will see.  Kjerstad has seemed to cool off significantly since the Tides stopped playing against Charlotte.   So he probably does want to see more from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Conway12 said:

Three balls to deep center last night and a laser to the Left Fielder. 

So far, Ryan O'Hearn is a great story and one that I really enjoy watching.  I hope it continues. 

Middle reliever is right around the consensus value we had on him in January wasn't it?  Of course in January, we were focused on packaging Kjerstad in a Cease deal so maybe trading O'Hearn would have been unwise.  Or was it Cowser we wanted to put in the package?  Gosh we were stupid lmao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Aglets said:

Thinking about starting a thread about why O'Hearn has to stay.

Santander might be the one whose spot is vulnerable when Kjerstad is ready.  Not because of his slow start per se.........but more because of it being his walk year.

Per se?  Santander is top 10 in RBI in the league.  There is no per se.

And has the Holliday experience thus far, or Cowser last year, taught anyone that prospects don't automatically hit even if they were hot in AAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 24fps said:

So far, Ryan O'Hearn is a great story and one that I really enjoy watching.  I hope it continues. 

Middle reliever is right around the consensus value we had on him in January wasn't it?  Of course in January, we were focused on packaging Kjerstad in a Cease deal so maybe trading O'Hearn would have been unwise.  Or was it Cowser we wanted to put in the package?  Gosh we were stupid lmao.

The truth is, a middle reliever is pretty much what you get in a trade of a 1B/COF/DH who has one year of service time left, unless the guy is a superstar level hitter.  

I think though that Trae value doesn’t always define a player’s value to the team he’s on.   There’s no question that O’Hearn brought more value to this team last year than a middle reliever would, and it looks like he will again.  

Now, could we get similar production from Kjerstad or Stowers?   Maybe, but we’re not going to find out unless someone gets hurt.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The truth is, a middle reliever is pretty much what you get in a trade of a 1B/COF/DH who has one year of service time left, unless the guy is a superstar level hitter.  

I think though that Trae value doesn’t always define a player’s value to the team he’s on.   There’s no question that O’Hearn brought more value to this team last year than a middle reliever would, and it looks like he will again.  

Now, could we get similar production from Kjerstad or Stowers?   Maybe, but we’re not going to find out unless someone gets hurt.  

 

There aren't many narratives that are more satisfying to me than an underappreciated guy sticking it to all the doubters - the more relentlessly the better.  O'Hearn got a last chance that objectively he didn't deserve and didn't squander it.  I really respect that. 

I don't know who Jacob Calvin Meyer is, but evidently he has a crystal ball that works.  Might be a valuable dude to get to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 24fps said:

There aren't many narratives that are more satisfying to me than an underappreciated guy sticking it to all the doubters - the more relentlessly the better.  O'Hearn got a last chance that objectively he didn't deserve and didn't squander it.  I really respect that. 

I don't know who Jacob Calvin Meyer is, but evidently he has a crystal ball that works.  Might be a valuable dude to get to know.

He's a beat reporter for The Sun

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 24fps said:

So far, Ryan O'Hearn is a great story and one that I really enjoy watching.  I hope it continues. 

Middle reliever is right around the consensus value we had on him in January wasn't it?  Of course in January, we were focused on packaging Kjerstad in a Cease deal so maybe trading O'Hearn would have been unwise.  Or was it Cowser we wanted to put in the package?  Gosh we were stupid lmao.

No one thought Burnes was an option.  I think pretty much everyone would have taken the Burns deal over the proposed Cease deals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

No one thought Burnes was an option.  I think pretty much everyone would have taken the Burns deal over the proposed Cease deals.

Myself included.  That said I'm paying attention to see if he can maintain his hot start to the season.  He's looking pretty good right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holmes had a blown save and the Angels beat the Yankees, maybe he's available.
    • Hyde needs to adjust his bullpen usage IMO.  We don't have the shutdown options we had last year and he's managing like we do.  We have good starters, push them a little bit and try to squeeze extra innings out of them while getting someone warm if they run into trouble.   Grayson could have gone an extra inning and maybe we wouldn't have given up 4 in the last few innings to put the game out of reach.  I understand that there will be occasions where you invite criticism that you're leaving your starters out to dry, but most of our bullpen options have been really unreliable and I think if you stick to the guns that got you there knowing what our bullpen is like you just live with it if it doesn't work out.  It's not like we're pushing our starters to 120 pitches.
    • Yankees lose one to the last place Angels thanks to a Rizzo error, Holmes blown save, and offense that failed to get another baserunner after taking a lead in the 5th inning.  The kind of things I've heard around here real championship contenders just don't do! 
    • First thing is first, the Negro Leagues had a lot of great talent and it’s a crime they never got to play in the MLB. That’s a given.    Second, the math doesn’t math here in regard to Gibson, unless I am missing something: Baseball reference has his career lasting for 14 total seasons spanning from 1930-1946.  There’s no ‘31 or ‘32 seasons for him and no ‘41 season.  His listed career stats are the .373 batting average, .718 SLG, 166 homers, 135 doubles   How do they come up with a .718 SLG on 166 homers and 135 doubles across 14 seasons?
    • I fear we are perennially going to want  just a little bit more from Grayson—and then it will all click for a few years in his 30’s for some other team.
    • Just checked some box scores-- I believe the O's have let a SP start an inning at 90+ pitches only once all year. Grayson was sent out for the 7th inning on April 5th vs Pittsburgh, at 92 pitches. The only other close one I found, Kremer was sent out for the 6th on April 24th at LAA, at 89 pitches.  For what it's worth, on both occasions the pitcher gave up a HR and didn't finish the inning. 
    • I actually think Cano is a lot closer to getting back to elite performance than the expected numbers suggest.  The GB numbers are still absolutely elite (100th percentile) and he’s getting a ton of chases (99th percentile) and whiffs (82nd percentile). And tonight, 3 whiffs on 9 swings, so that number will come up a little further. Pretty good company amongst the guys with 30+ whiff rate and 60+ GB rate: Clay Holmes (30.5; 68.3) — .255 wOBA Camilo Doval (35.1; 64.9) — .288 wOBA Erik Miller (34.7; 61.1) — .309 wOBA Declan Cronin (29.9; 61.2) — .279 wOBA   The HH rate is staggeringly high, and the average EV is relatedly high, but from watching him all year, I don’t think he’s making that many bad pitches. I do feel like the bad pitches he’s made have mostly gotten smashed so far. The guy has given up 12 flyballs all year coming into tonight, and 4 of them have gone over the fence.    The Wong AB tonight kind of sums up Cano’s season so far, I think. He made 5 good pitches in that at-bat. (1) Whiff on a great sinker, (2) whiff on another good sinker, (3) barely fouls off another great sinker down and in, (4) tough take on an elevated 4-seamer, (5) fouls off a changeup well out of the zone. The 6th pitch was a sinker that just didn’t sink, and Wong smoked it. That’s a pretty damn well-pitched AB to end up with a 102 MPH laser for an RBI. Anyway, a lot of the misses remind me of mid-season last year. Leaving the sinker (and the slider) up at times, the classic cement mixer effect where they just hang. And they’re getting crushed. It seemed like last year there was a tweak with the elbow that helped drive that sinker back down — perhaps something like that again? If they could just eliminate some of those awful pitches, I think he’d be in business, because the profile is really good otherwise. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...