Jump to content

Why Ryan O’Hearn Must Go (Sorry, Ryan)


RZNJ

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Well, the important thing on that chart is that it shows that a 25% chance play gets 5 stars, not 2.   So if Tony is right that it had a 25% catch probability, it’s a 5-star play (that wasn’t made).   

But honestly, that shouldn’t be rated a 5-star play IMO.   I’ve mentioned that I don’t think they’ve really solved the problem of balls near the wall, though I know they’ve tried.   
 

I think we can agree that it wasn’t an easy/routine catch by any means and certainly no slam dunk that Santander makes the catch.  Maybe he doesn’t even get as close as O’Hearn did.   I think O’Hearn is below average in RF, not terrible, and was unfairly maligned by many on that play.  And don’t argue with me because you know I’m one of those people who doesn’t know when to walk away from an argument.  😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Well, the important thing on that chart is that it shows that a 25% chance play gets 5 stars, not 2.   So if Tony is right that it had a 25% catch probability, it’s a 5-star play (that wasn’t made).   

But honestly, that shouldn’t be rated a 5-star play IMO.   I’ve mentioned that I don’t think they’ve really solved the problem of balls near the wall, though I know they’ve tried.   
 

I definitely think the catch probability is off and the chart is right. You are absolutely right that a 25% chance of catching that ball should be a 5-star catch. There is no way that was a 5-star catch in my mind. O'Hearn almost caught that it was only because he got worried about the wall that he didn't. You catch tell me Santander would not have caught that ball. 

Even the chart contradicts itself with catch probability, which I've seen before and not understood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I definitely think the catch probability is off and the chart is right. You are absolutely right that a 25% chance of catching that ball should be a 5-star catch. There is no way that was a 5-star catch in my mind. O'Hearn almost caught that it was only because he got worried about the wall that he didn't. You catch tell me Santander would not have caught that ball. 

Even the chart contradicts itself with catch probability, which I've seen before and not understood. 

Are you saying that you think it’s likely Santander makes that catch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I just noticed Colton Cowser has one of the six 5-star catches the system has given out so far this season.   

 

And yet, I don’t see one on his player page, same as O’Hearn.   I’d say Savant has some data  clean-up to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O’Hearn continues to have some of the best ABs on the team this year.  A bloop hit, a walk, and a laser to CF for an out.   4 walks and 2 strikeouts in 28 PA.   O’Hearn deserves a shout out and this is it.   Go Ryan!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

O’Hearn continues to have some of the best ABs on the team this year.  A bloop hit, a walk, and a laser to CF for an out.   4 walks and 2 strikeouts in 28 PA.   O’Hearn deserves a shout out and this is it.   Go Ryan!

Seems like everytime he is up he gives a professional at bat. Should’ve walked with the bases loaded too, if not for the ump. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, RZNJ said:

O’Hearn continues to have some of the best ABs on the team this year.  A bloop hit, a walk, and a laser to CF for an out.   4 walks and 2 strikeouts in 28 PA.   O’Hearn deserves a shout out and this is it.   Go Ryan!

Lot of MLB Network pregame from Fenway this hour with a very light MLB schedule tonight, and Jon Morosi just shared an anecdote George Brett loved him when they were in KC together.

Should thread title go to Ryan O'Hearn 2024?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, RZNJ said:

O’Hearn continues to have some of the best ABs on the team this year.  A bloop hit, a walk, and a laser to CF for an out.   4 walks and 2 strikeouts in 28 PA.   O’Hearn deserves a shout out and this is it.   Go Ryan!

He’s off to a good start. I’d still prefer Kjerstad in his role, but maybe we can move OHearn for RP help down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Just Regular said:

Lot of MLB Network pregame from Fenway this hour with a very light MLB schedule tonight, and Jon Morosi just shared an anecdote George Brett loved him when they were in KC together.

Should thread title go to Ryan O'Hearn 2024?

No.  I think the title is still appropriate.  It might be incorrect but it’s something that will be continue to be debated.   I’m glad I put the “Sorry” in the title.  Lol

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sanity Check said:

Had to bump this....to the thread title....No, he doesn't.

Our AAA guys have seemingly come back to earth, my friends.

Don’t worry, he’ll come back down to earth in no time. The Orioles didn’t actually fix his swing, that was just a fairy tale. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like all players, O’Hearn will go through his hot and cold stretches. Right now he is on a heater.

However, he has been one of our most consistent hitters since joining the team early last season. He is cheap and performs very well. That is not the kind of player who you give away to make room for a lesser known quantity/player.

He has real value as a consistent MOO bat who happens to be LH, which is a greater asset in our park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Before the great purge in the 1990s* the umps more-or-less did whatever they wanted. They'd interview an ump and he'd say things like "the strike zone is what I say the strike zone is." There would be talk of reforming things and the umps and their union basically just said no. We're the umpires, goldang it, and we control what goes on. Wrong call? Missed something? Bullcrap, we're the best umps in the world, how dare you question us? And until HDTV and cameras everywhere, and tracking systems in the last ~20 years it was often hard to tell just how good or bad they were. But now, with Statcast everywhere, even in the minors, and HD broadcasts of every game, it's a whole new world. Umpires have been graded on balls/strikes for many years. They just accept that the whole world knows more-or-less objectively if they were right or wrong in near real time. They can't hide. Truly terrible, belligerent, rogue umps don't exist like they did when I was a kid. That's why Angel and one or two others stand out. But they'd have been mid-pack or better in the 1990s. There can still be improvements, but umpiring is better than it's ever been. * Remember there was some kind of work stoppage and the umps resigned en masse, and the owners called their bluff and accepted the resignations. When the umps came crawling back the owners only brought back the ones they liked.)
    • To record outs efficiently in September and October.
    • His command of all of his pitches is not great, but they seemed improved from last year. Some of the stuff is real good, but he still looks more like a potential bullpen guy than a starter to me.
    • Why would we trade a starting pitcher prospect for a reliever?
    • Did anyone think to look at the Statcast data before wondering out loud if the O's should pick up a guy like Pillar? The last 3-4 years even his range, which is really his calling card, is roughly average, maybe a tick above. The last time his OAA was off the charts was 2016. You know, when Brian Matusz and Ubaldo were still on the Os. You have to squint pretty hard to see the advantages Pillar brings over McKenna.
    • Its one of the byproducts of playing .600+ ball for a month. Here are AL relievers by games pitched so far (holy cow what is Oakland doing with TJ McFarland!) https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/major-league?pos=all&lg=al&qual=y&type=8&season=2024&month=0&season1=2024&ind=0&stats=rel&sortcol=5&sortdir=default&pagenum=1 CLE - Barlow, Sandlin, Gaddis, Clase BAL - Cano, Coulombe, Webb, Kimbrel NYY is leaning on Holmes. Certainly the next 3 games could shift heavily if Yennier or Holmes gets attrited more quickly. If SP returns are friendly to the Orioles in the coming months, Elias can really focus on the RP market.    Is it too early Eduardo style to start thinking about what RP rentals he would give up Cade Povich for?     Cade Povich for Ryan Pressly, Cade Povich for Ryan Helsley.    David Bednar with a bunch of years is more. The reward if you can lock up your division is everyone can go to the spa for September.
    • I agree with what you said about Hays. It minimizes Cowser’s exposure/limitations.  However, I cannot agree with your Cedric Mullins’ take. We don’t have another OF we can cover CF anywhere as well. For whatever we would be loosing in defensive value, the offensive uptick would have to be considerable in order to do that. Mullins is that good in CF IMO.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...