Jump to content

Enrique Bradfield Jr. 2024


Frobby

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

And you’ve determined Bradfields swing is ineffective after 13-14 games?   Good for you.

He wasn’t exactly lighting it up in college either.  Every scouting report and every prospect review says the swing is a problem, yet I am am the one that is speaking out of school to say that it is while you are the sane one for saying it’s fine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, baltfan said:

He wasn’t exactly lighting it up in college either.  Every scouting report and every prospect review says the swing is a problem, yet I am am the one that is speaking out of school to say that it is while you are the sane one for saying it’s fine?

 

3 minutes ago, baltfan said:

He wasn’t exactly lighting it up in college either.  Every scouting report and every prospect review says the swing is a problem, yet I am am the one that is speaking out of school to say that it is while you are the sane one for saying it’s fine?

Every scouting report?   Minus this Baseball America pre draft write up.



“Bradfield has tormented batteries with his blazing speed since his prep days with American Heritage High in Plantation, Fla., where he ranked as the No. 66 player in the 2020 class. Since getting to campus at Vanderbilt, he’s lived up to his reputation as a dynamic, disruptive speedster and lockdown center fielder who has hit .313/.427/.450 in 190 games with 130 stolen bases at a 90.9% success rate. Bradfield is a lean and skinny, 6-foot-1, 170-pound lefthanded hitter who has a level bat path that’s conducive to line drives and ground balls. He has a strong understanding of the strike zone and has walked at a 14.7% rate, struck out at a 13.5% rate and in 2023 made contact at an 87% rate. Brafield projects as a 30-grade power hitter in pro ball, but has sneaky exit velocities—an 87 mph average exit velocity in 2023—considering his size and overall home run production. Bradfield is an 80-grade runner who should pepper ground balls, line drives and drop bunts for infield singles, with consistently high BABIP numbers and elite baserunning. His speed translates to center field, where he’s also a top-of-the-scale defender who covers massive swaths of ground, with great instincts albeit a below-average arm. Bradfield has a polarizing profile and has much less power than the average first round college outfielder, but he’s also a potential Gold Glove winner and stolen base champion who earns Juan Pierre comps.“

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He will always have the speed and the glove. We have this season and next with Mullins. I know we are used to our first round picks hitting the cover off the ball to start there career. We can be patient with this one. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

And you’ve determined Bradfields swing is ineffective after 13-14 games?   Good for you.

It’s silly to be judging Bradfield at this stage.  I don’t know if he’ll be good or not, but I know you need to give him a couple of months at least before you have any clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was the 17th pick with blazing speed and great defense.  If he was a great hitter also he wouldn't have been the 17th pick.

Gonna take some time and it may or may not be a pick that works out.  Still on the first chapter of the book that will be his pro baseball career.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll echo the folks that say it's way too early to draw any conclusions on the bat. While his start this year has not been very impressive, let's have the assessment conversation at the end of the year. Cowser looked really ugly in Aberdeen in his first 44 games there in his first full minor league season slashing .236/.386/.363/.749 with a 36 BB - 62 K ratio in 197 PAs.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradfield has a .268 BABIP right now. Would this conversation even be happening if he’d just had more balls in play end up singles, as you would expect from a 80 grade runner who never hits fly balls?  We don’t have any publicly available info to conclude what his exit velos look like.

He actually has a decent (relative to expectations for him) .098 ISO with 3 2B and a 3B, plus still quite good K/BB. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

He will always have the speed and the glove. We have this season and next with Mullins. I know we are used to our first round picks hitting the cover off the ball to start there career. We can be patient with this one. 

 Cowser got off to a terrible start.  Kjerstad was pretty bad during his time in Aberdeen.   Westburg went through some awful slumps.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have nothing to back this up... but.... 

I'm strictly guessing, but have to imagine they are working on tweaking his swing / stance / approach, etc. The O's knew exactly who he is when they drafted him, and must have seen something they can work with. Anyone who has ever played can relate to the difficulty of a combination of trying to change something that has been muscle memory for years, while simultaneously facing a higher level of competition.

This, combined with the O's recent success in developing hitters, and the small sample size, encourages me to have patience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll echo the folks that say it's way too early to draw any conclusions on the bat. While his start this year has not been very impressive, let's have the assessment conversation at the end of the year. Cowser looked really ugly in Aberdeen in his first 44 games there in his first full minor league season slashing .236/.386/.363/.749 with a 36 BB - 62 K ratio in 197 PAs.

 

Yup. This is exactly what I was think. Everyone was so down on Cowser then once he got to Bowie his numbers came up. Even Gunnar’s magical year, he had his lowest numbers in Aberdeen. EBJ will be ok and will be in Bowie for the 2nd half of the season. The expectations of how fast he would move were too high. 

It’s looking like we’ll probably just let Mullins play out his contract like Santa. So that means EBJ’s timeline is just fine,

May - June 24’ - Aberdeen

July - Sept 24’ - Bowie

ST 25’ - one of the last cuts

OD 25’ - Norfolk

OD 26’ - Baltimore 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Bradfield is less likely to be negatively affected by Aberdeen than other players mentioned here like Cowser, because he’s not a power hitter.  His game is slashing the ball for singles and occasional doubles, and beating out grounders, and getting on base via walks.  Those things aren’t affected by the ballpark in the way that long fly balls are.  So, I’m not going to buy “well, it’s Aberdeen.”

At the same time, Bradfield hasn’t played enough games for me to start worrying. He’s at a point in this year where he could have two good games back to back and his numbers would suddenly look very good.  His K rate is good, his BB rate is good, he just needs a few more hits to fall in.  It’s too soon to have any concerns.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I think Bradfield is less likely to be negatively affected by Aberdeen than other players mentioned here like Cowser, because he’s not a power hitter.  His game is slashing the ball for singles and occasional doubles, and beating out grounders, and getting on base via walks.  Those things aren’t affected by the ballpark in the way that long fly balls are.  So, I’m not going to buy “well, it’s Aberdeen.”

At the same time, Bradfield hasn’t played enough games for me to start worrying. He’s at a point in this year where he could have two good games back to back and his numbers would suddenly look very good.  His K rate is good, his BB rate is good, he just needs a few more hits to fall in.  It’s too soon to have any concerns.  
 

From what I've understand, the issue is less about park dimensions but about the batting eye behind CF.  So it could have an impact on any type of hitter.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

From what I've understand, the issue is less about park dimensions but about the batting eye behind CF.  So it could have an impact on any type of hitter.

I've kind of heard the same thing. It's not just a lack of power that regresses in Aberdeen, but the K-BB ratio have typically been among the worse for the players who eventually made the big leagues (Gunnar, Adley, Cowser, Westburg) and had success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

From what I've understand, the issue is less about park dimensions but about the batting eye behind CF.  So it could have an impact on any type of hitter.

I have heard that about the batters’ eye, but I’ve also heard the ball doesn’t travel well there.   Also, I’ve read that the lighting there is poor.  So it’s several things.  None of which bothered Jackson Holliday.  😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • For the same reason I mentioned. The biomechanical toll that pitching in the high 90's takes on the elbow. Whether it happens in AAA or early MLB... it has the same impact on the pool of talent. Slides it all up.
    • I never said it's becoming unglued. Reading is fundamental. I said if we don't make moves I could see things unraveling.
    • The issue is 3 of those issues were known before February, and weren’t addressed 
    • I think the main reason for this is the number of ML players who have had serious injuries in the last two seasons.  Anyone close to major league ready has been called up.
    • You have to admit this is kind of nuts. These are the top pitching prospects in baseball. How many Orioles do you see? 1   Paul Skenes    RHP    PIT   9    Yoshinobu Yamamoto    RHP    LAD   21    Cade Horton    RHP    CHC    23    Andrew Painter    RHP    PHI  31    Jackson Jobe    RHP    DET    39    Jacob Misiorowski    RHP    MIL    55    Chase Hampton    RHP    NYY    56    Mason Miller    RHP    OAK   59    AJ Smith-Shawver    RHP   ATL 60    Drew Thorpe    RHP    SD   64    Hurston Waldrep    RHP    ATL 65    Tink Hence    RHP    STL    67    Dylan Lesko    RHP    SD     68    Brock Porter    RHP    TEX    70    Rhett Lowder    RHP    CIN    75    Mick Abel    RHP    PHI   83    Noble Meyer    RHP    MIA 84    Jared Jones    RHP    PIT     87    Chase Petty    RHP    CIN    94    Cade Cavalli    RHP    WAS     103    Jack Leiter    RHP    TEX     113    Daniel Espino    RHP    CLE    123    Ben Joyce    RHP    LAA    129    Gavin Stone    RHP    LAD     132    Connor Phillips    RHP    CIN    133    River Ryan    RHP    LAD     136    Christian Scott    RHP    NYM   141    Tekoah Roby    RHP    STL    145    Blade Tidwell    RHP    NYM   147    Wilmer Flores    RHP    DET   148    Orion Kerkering    RHP    PHI    150    Nick Frasso    RHP    LAD  152    Bubba Chandler    RHP    PIT   161    Chase Dollander    RHP    COL    164    Landen Maroudis    RHP    TOR     165    Ty Madden    RHP    DET     166    Ben Brown    RHP    CHC    172    Emerson Hancock    RHP    SEA     176    Will Warren    RHP    NYY   177    Owen Murphy    RHP    ATL     181    Carlos F. Rodriguez    RHP    MIL   183    Nick Nastrini    RHP    CHW   186    Spencer Arrighetti    RHP    HOU    189    Luis Morales    RHP    OAK     To me, champions have great pitching and defense. Our pitching is a mess right now.
    • FWIW... I don't see anything coming unglued at all. I am talking about strategic rather than tactical observations. (I suspect you weren't including me in the admonition, but I thought I'd clarify)
    • Ah... sorry... your bolded was buried in the hidden part of the quote window in my browser, so I missed it. And yeah, I would agree. There doesn't seem to be a monster surplus of promising AAA arms. I'd suggest maybe two reasons for this. 1) It serves to reinforce the idea of quality pitchers being harder to judge than quality position players. 2) It is somewhat indicative of the toll that bio-mechanics imposes on pitchers being coached into the high 90's That said, the smaller selection pool of pitchers should be somewhat offset by the larger pool of position players you've hoarded, if you've employed the strategy well. Making you the queen of the trade deadline dance.  I think our bigger problem has been holding on to our journeymen MLB players after they've had a good year, instead of trading them at peak (rather than a true lack of AAA or even AA arms). To be successful at this you have to have to courage to be a seller at the deadline even when you have a winning record and are a contender.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...