Jump to content

All of the sudden...


NewMarketSean

Recommended Posts

Of course he's not...Anyone expecting him to be in top form right now, after missing so much time, is being totally unrealistic.

He needs innings...he needs to stay healthy and just pitch.

Where did I say I expected him to be back to 06 form? Chill out man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Yeah, but I think it's fair to argue that he should sharpen up in the bullpen rather than as a member of the rotation.

So, yes, I am saying Old#5Fan is being reasonable here. Not necessarily right, but his position isn't necessarily wrong.

The real issue is, do we have 5 guys better than Penn right now? For that, we need to stay tuned. We still have 3 turns though the possible rotation candidates before we really have to cut bait.

Yea, i think it is fair to say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, jeez, I was afraid the Lier's stuff was going to start getting thrown around like this. This is a perfect example of what I suspected would happen when I read that thing. I will just go on record as saying that you're assuming a lot more value in that analysis than either Crawdad, Stotle, or I. I will also go on record as saying that repeating other's opinions as if they're forgone facts/conclusions is just as bad as doing it with your own opinions.

Scouts said before the draft that they didn't like the way Matusz landed on a stiff front leg, and if he's still doing that in the majors, it is a legitimate concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouts said before the draft that they didn't like the way Matusz landed on a stiff front leg, and if he's still doing that in the majors, it is a legitimate concern.

I don't think I have never heard you complain about Matusz's mechanics before the analysis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Baseball America's analysis on the Matusz pick:

Mechanically, he's tight and compact, though his arm action is a bit awkward and slightly stiff. He also lands on a straight front leg at times, which some regard as an injury concern and which makes it harder for him to drive his fastball down through the zone.

So Lier wasn't the first to point this out. I've said Matusz could be an injury risk right after we drafted him as you can see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Baseball America's analysis on the Matusz pick:

So Lier wasn't the first to point this out. I've said Matusz could be an injury risk right after we drafted him as you can see here.

Even so, you're taking an extremely pessimistic view here. Even in his limited time this year in ST, he has opened many eyes as to how good he is. Even tho I agree with those who say to send him to the minors to build stamina and... veteranosity... I still want to see him as soon as possible. Just not before he's really ready.

I don't see how you could possibly be down on the Matusz pick.:confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even so, you're taking an extremely pessimistic view here. Even in his limited time this year in ST, he has opened many eyes as to how good he is. Even tho I agree with those who say to send him to the minors to build stamina and... veteranosity... I still want to see him as soon as possible. Just not before he's really ready.

I don't see how you could possibly be down on the Matusz pick.:confused:

Is JTrea down on the pick or did he just prefer us to go another way?

I am on record saying I think Matusz will be very good but I would still rather have Smoak than him....Its nothing against Matusz at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is JTrea down on the pick or did he just prefer us to go another way?

I am on record saying I think Matusz will be very good but I would still rather have Smoak than him....Its nothing against Matusz at all.

I hope Matusz succeeds, but he's a far riskier prospect to do so at a position we did have some depth in vs. a surer thing at a postiion we have no real depth in.

With that said, he looks ready more than the starters we want to put out there in the rotation so he should be starting on Opening Day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is JTrea down on the pick or did he just prefer us to go another way?

I am on record saying I think Matusz will be very good but I would still rather have Smoak than him....Its nothing against Matusz at all.

That's fair. But Trea sounds like he's grasping at straws because we took Matusz over Smoak. You prefer Smoak over Matusz but still see the value in Matusz. Trea writes Brian off out of hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouts said before the draft that they didn't like the way Matusz landed on a stiff front leg, and if he's still doing that in the majors, it is a legitimate concern.

Yeah, but you're forgetting the rest of that LXA thread.

It doesn't really mean anything. Yes, its concern but there are plenty of pitchers that have succeeded and done well with poor mechanics. There are a TON of pitchers that throw across their bodies who haven't had serious arm problems.

What the X factor is, is that if Matusz has the genetic makeup to withstand something bad in his mechanics. If he's strong enough, it won't matter.

You're taking something and running with it like it's a foregone conclusion, dude. You've mastered that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well to me it looks like this:

Guthrie

Uehara

Penn

Bergensen

(Hill after brief stint on DL/ minor rehab)

Hill should be DL'ed retroactive to a couple weeks ago and get a minor-leage rehab assignment for the first two weeks of the season.

We don't really need the 5th starter until the 15th. And even then, if we can get by with a swingman that day the 16th is a day off, we could get by without a 5th starter until April 21.

The timing of Hill's injury is bad, but I like that they are taking it slow with him and not trying to rush him back.

We also have guys like Hernandez and Pauley, even after his bad start, that can be a temp number 5 guy until Hill is ready.

I agree with you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 7 saves, 2 were with a 3 run lead. I guess you're right.
    • My original goal was to see if anyone had more value than Gunner in his first 208 games as an Oriole at the start of his career. But the span finder in Stathead doesn't do WAR. Rettenmund hit better, but was worth 6.1 rWAR in his first 232 games. Blefary was an okay LFer, so no. Sheets was a essentially a DH. Rutschman may have done it. His pace has been 7.7 rWAR per 208. Cal was sort of close, but hurt by that start. Through 182 games he was sitting on 4.2. Eddie was held back by being a DH a lot in his first year or two. So I'm pretty confident that the two most valuable Orioles through their first ~1.5 seasons are Henderson and Rutschman.
    • As an aside, I was shocked how bad Bumbry’s second full year was when I looked it up following my guesses.  .898 as a rookie, then .592.   I also forgot that Jim Gentile had a couple of cups of coffee in other orgs before his rookie year in Baltimore, so he didn’t qualify for the list.  
    • Last year at Bowie he was 109/288 (37.8%).   This year he’s at 21/64 (32.8%).   So, that’s progress.  He’s always going to strike out a lot.   
    • You got Rutschman, he's 5th at .799. Here, since nobody else took me up on it, this is the top 13 just becase Cal is 13th: Rk Player Team Span Started Span Ended OPS PA AB R H 1B 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS 1 Merv Rettenmund BAL 1968-04-14 1971-04-28 .864 735 628 96 185 122 32 6 25 96 21 10 86 116 .295 .380 .484 .864 2 Gunnar Henderson BAL 2022-08-31 2024-04-24 .836 864 773 132 203 111 39 13 40 120 16 4 79 219 .263 .334 .502 .836 3 Curt Blefary BAL 1965-04-14 1966-06-29 .831 818 687 111 177 108 29 6 34 105 5 3 114 102 .258 .365 .466 .831 4 Larry Sheets BAL 1984-09-18 1986-09-02 .812 680 628 82 174 114 24 1 35 108 2 1 44 101 .277 .326 .486 .812 5 Adley Rutschman BAL 2022-05-21 2023-07-25 .799 896 763 118 199 120 52 1 26 84 4 1 124 152 .261 .365 .434 .799 6 Ryan Mountcastle BAL 2020-08-21 2022-05-22 .797 851 780 101 210 135 31 1 43 129 6 4 57 222 .269 .320 .477 .797 7 Trey Mancini BAL 2016-09-20 2018-06-05 .796 845 775 97 215 141 36 4 34 100 1 0 57 197 .277 .330 .466 .796 8 Nick Markakis BAL 2006-04-05 2007-06-22 .789 864 783 112 223 150 45 3 25 104 9 1 67 122 .285 .343 .446 .789 9 Cedric Mullins BAL 2018-08-10 2021-08-03 .787 864 773 106 212 137 41 9 25 64 30 12 67 169 .274 .339 .448 .787 10 Jay Gibbons BAL 2001-04-06 2003-04-03 .783 798 729 99 178 94 40 1 43 106 1 4 59 106 .244 .305 .479 .783 11 Al Bumbry BAL 1972-09-05 1975-05-31 .780 806 735 117 220 160 35 16 9 64 34 14 57 118 .299 .353 .427 .780 12 Eddie Murray BAL 1977-04-07 1978-06-02 .779 878 806 101 222 148 38 3 33 113 0 3 62 130 .275 .326 .453 .779 13 Cal Ripken Jr. BAL 1981-08-12 (2) 1983-05-17 (2) .778 853 779 116 206 126 41 6 33 115 3 3 62 126 .264 .318 .460 .778  
    • Fine for 3 run save opportunities 
    • No one saves 100%. Kimbrel will be fine overall. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...