Jump to content

On the record Poll: Hays or McKenna (Update: McKenna DFA'd (Claimed by Giants), Hays activated)


Tony-OH

On the record Poll: Hays or McKenna (Update: McKenna DFA'd (Claimed by Giants), Hays activated)  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. Hays or McKenna on the team this year?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/18/24 at 20:09

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

McKenna hit a couple of HR's to help us win a couple of games. I kinda miss losing him.  I thought he was a good bench player instead of Kjerstadt or Stowers. I wish we designated Urias instead of McKenna.

Urias is a way, way better player than McKenna. There's no convincing argument you can possibly make using facts and statistics that would prove otherwise. 

Edited by Brooks The Great
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooks The Great said:

Urias is a way, way better player than McKenna. There's no convincing argument you can possibly make using facts and statistics that would prove otherwise. 

Right, Urias has shown he can be a starter and would get claimed immediately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, survivedc said:

Right, Urias has shown he can be a starter and would get claimed immediately.

Guy I was responding to was being purely reactionary and doesn't care about talent or career production. He was overreacting to both McKenna's 2 fluke home runs, and Urias's slow start this season.

Urias is an actual gold glove winner, while McKenna is only a good defender in the minds of Hyde and Elias - McKenna has actually killed the Orioles with his glove/arm/routes in his limited appearances. Urias has a long track record of slightly above average offensive production, which makes him a valuable player considering he's a good defender. McKenna is a terrible overall hitter and the stats reflect that. His glove isn't worth platooning him on the bench, or even a roster spot. 

Edited by Brooks The Great
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the outfield is hitting right now Hays can’t get here fast enough.  Cowser struggling, Santander huts few homers here and there but that it and Mullins looks the worst of all 3.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Frobby said:

The amount of bile directed at McKenna is ridiculous IMO.  We won all three games he started, and were 7-2 in the games in which he played.  He had two homers, a single and a walk in 9 PA.  Admittedly he didn’t get to two fly balls that might have been caught and made a poor throw home in the Nats game.  He also made a 3-star, 55% probability catch that several of our outfielders probably wouldn’t have gotten to. 

In short, I don’t mind that he was DFA and if he gets claimed I won’t lose any sleep over it.  I just see no reason to vilify the guy.  
 

Besides the guy who said he prayed everyday that McKenna is off the team, perhaps you can point us to the "amount of bile directed at McKenna?" I see most people discussing his merits, whether he will be taken or not, or whether he might be better off in the KBO.

Unless you believe saying that you hope he's claimed is "ridiculous amounts of bile" or "vilifying him." This seems to be a JLC-level over reaction and an over simplification of the actual comments made in this thread IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Frobby said:

The amount of bile directed at McKenna is ridiculous IMO.  We won all three games he started, and were 7-2 in the games in which he played.  He had two homers, a single and a walk in 9 PA.  Admittedly he didn’t get to two fly balls that might have been caught and made a poor throw home in the Nats game.  He also made a 3-star, 55% probability catch that several of our outfielders probably wouldn’t have gotten to. 

In short, I don’t mind that he was DFA and if he gets claimed I won’t lose any sleep over it.  I just see no reason to vilify the guy.  
 

Second this Frobby. I think McKenna has made a valuable contribution to the O's this year and especially last year. Don't understand at all the negativity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Besides the guy who said he prayed everyday that McKenna is off the team, perhaps you can point us to the "amount of bile directed at McKenna?" I see most people discussing his merits, whether he will be taken or not, or whether he might be better off in the KBO.

Unless you believe saying that you hope he's claimed is "ridiculous amounts of bile" or "vilifying him." This seems to be a JLC-level over reaction and an over simplification of the actual comments made in this thread IMHO.

I’m sure it’s Spakman’s remark that set me off: “Literally been praying every single second to the God of my choice that someone takes him away from the Orioles organization.”  But just generally, I don’t hope that our players get claimed when they’re DFA.   When you say that, you’re saying that having the player in the organization is worse than not having him.  I don’t buy it.  I also didn’t like the remarks (in previous threads, not this one) suggesting that McKenna misjudging a fly ball was due to some character flaw on his part.

Edited by Frobby
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Besides the guy who said he prayed everyday that McKenna is off the team, perhaps you can point us to the "amount of bile directed at McKenna?" I see most people discussing his merits, whether he will be taken or not, or whether he might be better off in the KBO.

Unless you believe saying that you hope he's claimed is "ridiculous amounts of bile" or "vilifying him." This seems to be a JLC-level over reaction and an over simplification of the actual comments made in this thread IMHO.

It has been clear that there is a faction of this board and the Os fan base in general that have an over the top dislike for McKenna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, oriolediehard said:

McKenna hit a couple of HR's to help us win a couple of games. I kinda miss losing him.  I thought he was a good bench player instead of Kjerstadt or Stowers. I wish we designated Urias instead of McKenna.

I think we found McKenna's burner account.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Second this Frobby. I think McKenna has made a valuable contribution to the O's this year and especially last year. Don't understand at all the negativity

My problem with McKenna (Ryan, not Brian lol) is that he isn't what he is supposed to be. Maybe that is not his fault but, he hasn't made any adjustments to his game. I don't know if he goes into lala land in the outfield or what. But he often takes bad routes and he continues to make one handed catches off the the glove side while on his back foot. You'd think after the drop in Boston that he would have learned his lesson and made the adjustment but he hasn't. Another thing that bothers me (again, not his fault) but he seems to find his way into a lot of media stories or segments. I really don't care what Ryan McKenna thinks of our prospects. I don't care that he was with HK when he got the call this year. I don't care that he missed out on both celebrations last year. I am sure he is a great teammate and person. I'm tired of him being hyped as a speed/defense guy when he really doesn't play that level of defense consistently. He was fine when they sucked but they can and should do better now. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

It has been clear that there is a faction of this board and the Os fan base in general that have an over the top dislike for McKenna.

I don't dislike McKenna. I just don't think he is the type of 5th OF that should be on a WS contender. And I feel like I am being gaslighted by people, media telling me he is. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

 But just generally, I don’t hope that our players get claimed when they’re DFA.   When you say that, you’re saying that having the player in the organization is worse than not having him.  I don’t buy it.  I also didn’t like the remarks (in previous threads, not this one) suggesting that McKenna misjudging a fly ball was due to some character flaw on his part.

For me the guys I don't want to see playing in the MLB, I hope they get claimed.   I don't like McKenna.  When he's on the roster he gets playing time,  but he isn't good enough to really deserve it.   While Kjerstad and now Stowers rot on the bench,  McKenna gets into games for his defense, then he subsequently drops balls,  takes bad routes and/or doesn't appear to have his head in the game,  or he gets to pinch run, then promptly overslides the base,  resulting in an out.  The only way to ensure he isn't on the Os is to get him out of the organization, so that's my hope.   

I realize that not everyone in the lineup or on the roster is going to be a superstar.  But if you are on the team for your defensive,  then,  I dunno, be a good defender.  Or if you are there to be a force on the basepaths, then don't make dumb outs while stealing. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MCO'sFan said:

I don't dislike McKenna. I just don't think he is the type of 5th OF that should be on a WS contender. And I feel like I am being gaslighted by people, media telling me he is. 

Every team has guys like him. It’s a false narrative to pretend they don’t.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Every team has guys like him. It’s a false narrative to pretend they don’t.

No one said anything close to this. It's also a false narrative to say that they we (fans) should just accept it without discussing our opinions on a message board. 

Edited by MCO'sFan
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It’s more about the idea of giving up assets for someone who may not help you at all when you need it the most.
    • I remember Cashman giving some pretty sharp comments during 2023 spring training after Montas played out mostly as damaged goods when the Yankees traded for him in 2022. Yankees general manager Brian Cashman was very frank with reporters when discussing the trade on Feb. 15 in Tampa, per Joel Sherman of the New York Post. “We haven’t gotten access to the pitcher that we know what he is capable of when he is right,” Cashman said. “Clearly it hasn’t worked out at all. You know we didn’t really get anything out of it. I’m not looking for a headline of I regret the trade and then they run Montas down. This is part of doing business when you’re dealing with pitchers and there’s no guarantees and he came over with a clean bill of health. And obviously he wasn’t healthy, so the trade goes into a bad category. We gave up assets and we didn’t get anything for it. That’s also part of the business. I’ve traded players that have gone on and gotten hurt elsewhere and I’ve acquired players who [have gotten hurt]. You just don’t want to be a part of it, but it happens.”
    • Hernandez was coming off of a 107 OPS+, I think teams might have been reluctant he was falling off. The last time Santander had an OPS+ under 120 was in 2021.
    • He's hit more HRs in the past 3 years than any switch hitter in baseball and doesn't kill you in the field. His getting a QO was never in doubt. Not even in May.
    • I'm telling you why he should be moved (to the minors or in a trade) now, especially because there are superior replacement options on the major league roster and in the minors that can be more productive than him, as well as make the 26-man roster more versatile. It's perfectly reasonable for us to disagree on the timing on when the team will or should move on from Hays, and you're most likely correct that it will most likely be this offseason. But because I want the team to win a World Series this season, I hope they move on from him now/ASAP. Unfortunately, because of Elias's track record with even worse players such as Rougned Odor, Adam Frazier, Aaron Hicks, Ryan McKenna, and Jorge Mateo, I do think it'll be much later than I'd want. And, in my opinion, it's going to be to the detriment of the team. Another thing to consider - you point out that Hays has an OPS over .800 against lefties in 2024 at the moment. I don't think it's reasonable to consider that to be sustainable to due Hays' own career splits. Hays has a career OPS against lefties of .788. So it's reasonable to expect Hays to wind up close to that number by the end of this season. Even if Hays settles at .800 OPS against lefties as his final line, that'll mean he's likely going to be slashing an OPS of below .725ish (maybe less, I'm not great with math on the fly) the rest of the way to wind up there. That's not really any kind of significant platoon advantage to be benching Kjerstad in particular. The other reason it's reasonable to expect Hays' OPS against lefties to regress is that, just as Hays has a pronounced favorable career split against LHP, he also has a pronounced unfavorable career split in the second half. For his career, Hays has hit .242/.296/.710 in the second half, for a tOPS+ of 90. So Hays in the second half has been 10 percent worse than his total career OPS. That makes sense given Hays is an injury prone player and tends to play through nagging injuries, leading to diminished production at the plate.  Hays is/has been playing hurt. So it's not good baseball to stick with him and merely hope for the best, or to expect for him to continue overperforming considering his talent level, underlying metrics, and his career production. Its best to move on quickly to the younger options the team has available to replace him. 
    • Teoscar Hernandez seems like the good comp for what type of salary he would get though the year he having hitting might pass that.  Hernandez took a 1 year deal for 23.5 million for little bounce back deal.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...