Jump to content

No holiday card for Laz Dias this year


ChipTait

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Kremer really didn’t have his best stuff or command last night.  It just wasn’t his night.  It happens.  

Yes, but for me that is one of the biggest challenges in baseball especially for a starting pitcher, how do you handle the outings when you don't have your best stuff.

Also want to say, excellent thread title.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Kremer should have gone on IL for the blister when Grayson came back.

His performance had nothing at all to do with a blister as far as anyone knows. You don’t IL a non-injured player. 
 

He probably had too many days off, that was at least part of his issue. 8 days b/w starts is an eternity for a starter. That won’t be an issue again for a long while, maybe all season, even with the Sox man rotation, given the dearth of off days upcoming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

His performance had nothing at all to do with a blister as far as anyone knows. You don’t IL a non-injured player. 
 

He probably had too many days off, that was at least part of his issue. 8 days b/w starts is an eternity for a starter. That won’t be an issue again for a long while, maybe all season, even with the Sox man rotation, given the dearth of off days upcoming. 

Kremer denied both the blister and the extra rest as reasons, as any pitcher normally would. I tend to think both absolutely were a factor regardless of what he said. Would have been a convenient way to keep Irvin in the rotation and get Dean some extra time to get comfortable after getting the blister removed. It's extremely painful to deal with a popped blister and it takes a long time to form a new callous, etc. 

Just my opinion, no huge deal either way. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

His performance had nothing at all to do with a blister as far as anyone knows. You don’t IL a non-injured player. 
 

He probably had too many days off, that was at least part of his issue. 8 days b/w starts is an eternity for a starter. That won’t be an issue again for a long while, maybe all season, even with the Sox man rotation, given the dearth of off days upcoming. 

THIS. I said it last night in the game thread. This stupid six man rotation and moving starters around like chess pieces messes w/ their routines. You have to get Burnes on turn every 5 days to maximize him and then everyone else is like roulette. After last night, Kremer should just be moved to the pen and go back to a 5 man rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dtk9119 said:

THIS. I said it last night in the game thread. This stupid six man rotation and moving starters around like chess pieces messes w/ their routines. You have to get Burnes on turn every 5 days to maximize him and then everyone else is like roulette. After last night, Kremer should just be moved to the pen and go back to a 5 man rotation.

I don’t agree that a 6 man is ruining anything. I think one extra day for these guys (other than Burnes) is fine, I don’t think they’re overly accustomed to ‘normal’ rest anyway. Plus it helps limit innings a bit for the ones that matters on (Means back from TJ, Bradish elbow issue, Grayson shoulder issue - the extra day for these guys is a positive thing). 
 

What the 6 man does impact is the BP of course. We can’t afford many four inning outings like last night, and a bunch of fives would hurt too. So it’s a bit of a tightrope on that front. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Diaz has always been right there with Bucknor and Angel Hernandez forming the ugly trinity of the worst of the worst umps. Blew a huge missed strike when Cionel Perez was pitching also so he definitely gets a huge assist for the Cards winning game 1.

In Euroleage basketball they suspend refs for poor performance while in MLB you keep working and even get a strong chance to work the postseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2024 at 10:55 AM, dtk9119 said:

THIS. I said it last night in the game thread. This stupid six man rotation and moving starters around like chess pieces messes w/ their routines. You have to get Burnes on turn every 5 days to maximize him and then everyone else is like roulette. After last night, Kremer should just be moved to the pen and go back to a 5 man rotation.

They haven’t even gone to a six man rotation yet, so nothing is getting ruined. And do you know how many times Burnes pitched on four days’ rest last year?   Six times.  23 times on five days’ rest.  So if the O’s go to a six man rotation during a month-long period when they have one day off, all they’ll be doing is ensuring that Burnes gets the amount of rest he usually does.   I realize that we acquired Burnes to be our ace, but I don’t want my ace (or my other pitchers) running on fumes in September because we pushed them too hard in June when we had an unusually packed schedule.  So if Hyde decides to use a 6th starter a couple of times in June, fine by me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I never saw this posted. Basically he was just bad for the Orioles.

Rather amazingly, a 1.13 run favor to our opponent is only the 3rd largest disadvantage we’ve had so far this season, per Umpire Scorecard — Vic Carapazza gave the Brewers a 1.21 run edge back on 4/13 and Sean Barber provided a 1.65 run advantage for the Royals on 4/21.

Looking at Umpire Scorecard is actually infuriating me at the moment, because we’ve gotten absolutely hosed by the umps so far. Only Oakland and the White Sox have received more of a disadvantage from the umps so far, with the O’s checking in at a whopping -7.56 runs so far.

Our most favored game thus far has been getting a 0.71 run edge against the Nats on 5/7. We’ve had SIX separate games where we were more disfavored than that.

Cleveland has actually been the most favored team so far (by a wide margin), but I’m sure you can guess who is number two. I don’t like to Judge, but the umps have been quite a Boone to the team whose meat the league has Rodon for decades.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
    • McDermott has a WHIP of almost 1.5 and has walked 41 batters in 64 and 2/3 innings. I'm not sure how that plays at the Big League level or how anyone could have a lot of confidence that those numbers translate into the kind of shut down backend reliever that we need.
    • I would be not surprised at all if McDermott deloads after the all star break and comes up to use as a reliever a la do hall the last few years. He’s basically tanner Scott without having to give up prospects to get. 
    • I don't want anything for Grayson. We are trying to win and add, not subtract from areas of strength. We can add a a 2/3ish starter for less than Holliday and Kjerstad. We have plenty of players/prospects that we can trade that other teams want. After all, we have the best farm system in the game. Just because the player(s) is/are not the #1 prospect in the sport, it doesn't make him/them spare parts.
    • I'm surprised the O's haven't tried McDermott as a reliever yet.  Some posters have said the O's need 3 relievers.  There is no way the O's are trading for 3 relievers.  They might trade for 1, find one in the minors and claim one off the waiver wire. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...