Jump to content

The 2024 Trade Deadline


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, interloper said:

I see Elias going to find some under-valued/less-sexy SP because otherwise teams will take him right to the wire trying to pry Mayo or Basallo from him. And we don't really have time for that. 

Teams other than CWS and MIA are probably not selling right now. The NL is so bad that only the Rockies and Marlins are more than 1.5 games back of a WC berth right now. I doubt we know anything about who is selling until mid-July. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t understand why anyone would want to give up high end assets for Crochet. 

To me it’s a dogmatic obsession with winning a WS this year under any circumstances despite all evidence this is misguided.

IMO we should be upgrading the bullpen and bring up Mayo. That will have the biggest effect on this team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

Teams other than CWS and MIA are probably not selling right now. The NL is so bad that only the Rockies and Marlins are more than 1.5 games back of a WC berth right now. I doubt we know anything about who is selling until mid-July. 

No doubt. 

If we didn't already have similar guys in Irvin and Povich, I would say that JP Sears is a logical target for an innings eater lefty type. Maybe he still is if they'd rather keep Povich as depth in AAA since he's relatively untested. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

Teams other than CWS and MIA are probably not selling right now. The NL is so bad that only the Rockies and Marlins are more than 1.5 games back of a WC berth right now. I doubt we know anything about who is selling until mid-July. 

Yep..go get Nardi now. He’s a great target and makes a ton of sense for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Fiver6565 said:

Exactly. 

Because he's one of the best pitchers in the league,  has fantastic walk:strikeout  numbers, is 24/25 and has 2+ years of control?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t understand why anyone would want to give up high end assets for Crochet. 

I don’t think he’s worth Holliday/Mayo/Basallo level just because of the injury/innings limit concerns, but he’s pitching this year like one of the best SP in baseball and has 2.5 years of control (which will be cheap years in arb, considering he’s gone through once at just over league min). 

The key with Crochet is he has to still be starting in the playoffs to get full value from him then. That means either you let him keep rolling and hope the innings don’t catch up, or you do load management by some combination of skipping starts, pitch count limits and/or shifting him to the pen.

I could see a team using Crochet as a RP until September and then stretching him back out before the playoffs when you have expanded rosters to help bridge the innings during the initial shorter starts. But it’d be pretty wild to see a team pay what it’s going to take for him to then immediately shelf him like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Looking at the numbers objectively, Irvin & Suarez have out pitched Rodon.  If you are giving points for name recognition, then sure, Rodon would be a more popular choice.

Have you taken a few minutes to check out their statcast #s?  Suarez has objectively been the better pitcher.  

Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length.

The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups.

But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

I don’t think he’s worth Holliday/Mayo/Basallo level just because of the injury/innings limit concerns, but he’s pitching this year like one of the best SP in baseball and has 2.5 years of control (which will be cheap years in arb, considering he’s gone through once at just over league min). 

The key with Crochet is he has to still be starting in the playoffs to get full value from him then. That means either you let him keep rolling and hope the innings don’t catch up, or you do load management by some combination of skipping starts, pitch count limits and/or shifting him to the pen.

I could see a team using Crochet as a RP until September and then stretching him back out before the playoffs when you have expanded rosters to help bridge the innings during the initial shorter starts. But it’d be pretty wild to see a team pay what it’s going to take for him to then immediately shelf him like that. 

The whole “the key with Crochet” is exactly why trading for him makes no sense.

On top of that, how does he bounce back next year after throwing so many more innings than he ever has?

Im not questioning his talent, his upside, age, service time or anything.  It’s all on the side of the team that has him.

But they are going to want multiple top 50 type prospects for a guy with ace potential and a lot of service time.  His name shouldn’t even be mentioned imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length.

The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups.

But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.

Do you actually watch the MLB postseason?  Most teams get their starters out by the 6th inning.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Suarez has not had one single quality start this season. While I love what he has given us, he is the classic definition of a “5 and dive” pitcher, which is fine, especially for the regular season as long as you have other starters (like Burnes) who can give consistent length.

The problem with that for the post season is that forces your middle relievers into the game against teams with the best offenses. I’m not confident that the odds are necessarily stacked in our favor in some of those matchups.

But hey you never know, Akin sure surprised me on Friday with a stellar outing.

Which one you want pitching 5 innings for you?  Playoff games starter will typically go 5.  Maybe 6. 

IMG_3403.png

IMG_3404.png

Edited by emmett16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The whole “the key with Crochet” is exactly why trading for him makes no sense.

On top of that, how does he bounce back next year after throwing so many more innings than he ever has?

Im not questioning his talent, his upside, age, service time or anything.  It’s all on the side of the team that has him.

But they are going to want multiple top 50 type prospects for a guy with ace potential and a lot of service time.  His name shouldn’t even be mentioned imo.

It all depends on the price, they are going to want multiple top 50 prospects but I’m not sure they get that. I think they’ll get offers of 1 top 50 plus other pieces around top 100. We can’t know what the White Sox will do, but it’s similar to Cease - hard for his value to go up while his service time goes down + risk of injury.

For the Orioles it’s pretty easy, Kjerstad is the only top 50 prospect that should be on the table. If the White Sox won’t trade him without getting one of Holliday/Mayo/Basallo then it’s an easy no. But if it’s Kjerstad + lesser prospects, then I’m listening. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

It all depends on the price, they are going to want multiple top 50 prospects but I’m not sure they get that. I think they’ll get offers of 1 top 50 plus other pieces around top 100. We can’t know what the White Sox will do, but it’s similar to Cease - hard for his value to go up while his service time goes down + risk of injury.

For the Orioles it’s pretty easy, Kjerstad is the only top 50 prospect that should be on the table. If the White Sox won’t trade him without getting one of Holliday/Mayo/Basallo then it’s an easy no. But if it’s Kjerstad + lesser prospects, then I’m listening. 

I’d rather trade Kjerstad + for Robert if I’m dealing with the WS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I believe this is truly the "all in " year...not next year or the year after. After this year, it's conceivable we could lose Burnes, and Santander, and that would mean two of the best and(among) the most important players on the team. No Burnes(he'll command at least 30 million a year and likely more) would maybe give us ONE solid pitcher in Grod, and our outfield will be in flux. No, I think THIS is the year the Orioles have to win, and that means some dramatic, possibly risky trades at the break yield some significant upgrades to our beleaguered pitching both with starters and the pen. If we don't get it this year, we may never have a potential post season team in the next couple of years..not at this rate.
    • Luke Dickerson, SS, Morris Knolls HS, Rockaway, N.J. There are shades of Jackson Merrill and Sammy Stafura with Dickerson as a northeast/mid-atlantic prep shortstop who has received a lot of late helium this spring. He’s an offense-oriented righthanded hitter with a background as a talented hockey player. He might fit better at second base or center field, but teams like his hit/power combination enough to take him inside the first two rounds. He had a solid showing at the draft combine last week, as well. 
    • As the bluejays continue to fade, I cant help but think that they would be a trade fit if they decide to sell.  Specifically Gausman and Berrios. Gausman is under contract for 2 seasons after this one, and Berrios has 4 years with an opt out after 2 years. So you would essentially have both of those guys for 2.5 years which would be a big boost for 2024, and the coming years with Burnes likely gone and Bradish out for 2025. They are both on hefty contracts (for Orioles standards) but with our payroll and new ownership group you would think that wouldnt be a huge problem. Not sure what the asking price would be for one of, or both, of those guys but worth looking into. I know its hard to look at trading within the division, especially what would potentially be a "blockbuster" type of  deal but I just dont see a ton of options on the trade market right now outside of the White Sox, A's and Rockies and none of those teams can match what the bluejays have to offer.
    • He was all of that yes, but nothing close to Gunner so far or Cal's best year, and you also forgot about Eddie. not to mention Palmer in the 70,s
    • I don't trust Suarez at all.   He seems to lose command quickly.
    • I think we have to remember that Johnny Angelos hired Elias and the purpose was to cut payroll. Any halfway competent GM could hit on the Adley pick (or Witt if he went that route). I do give him props for the Gunnar and Westy picks, too. But, go back and watch Elias’ introductory press conference. He said the goal was to build an elite pipeline of talent. At no point were the words “win a World Series” ever uttered. Probably no correlation there, but interesting non-choice of words nonetheless. Elias won my admiration forever by getting rid of Chris Davis. Obviously, we still have to pay him, but just getting him out of the building was gigantic IMO.  I also can’t help but wonder if new ownership wants their own guy. I know Rubenstein has publicly said Elias is the guy, but we don’t know what is going on behind the scenes. Not sure if that is good or bad, but there’s the old saying “a new broom sweeps clean.” 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...