Jump to content

Bullpen usage


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Spy Fox said:

It's definitely sometimes a complaint.

 

Even I have been known to complain about it at times.  But I can’t really say our bullpen would have had better results if Hyde used guys in longer appearances more often.  No way to know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It has absolutely been a complaint. I would say bullpen management is the most common criticism of Hyde. 

And 90% of all managers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Even I have been known to complain about it at times.  But I can’t really say our bullpen would have had better results if Hyde used guys in longer appearances more often.  No way to know. 

A different way to answer your question would have been, the observers have observed about it and the complainers have complained about it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It has absolutely been a complaint. I would say bullpen management is the most common criticism of Hyde. 

But again as others have said it's probably organizational.  I'm not in the know but I doubt it can mostly be pinned on Hyde. 

The bigger issue with the bullpen is more that we need one or two better pitchers than we currently got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, oriolediehard said:

Elias should get Hyde better bullpen pieces to help Hyde's strategy.

Yohan Ramirez just got the Yankees out in the 11th, if only we had a guy like him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

Not sure, but some front office guys somewhere might know. 

My first guess would be that IP is more important, competitive in-game pitches being the biggest possible burden on an arm. But that if one guy threw 80 IP over 80 appearances, he maybe earned a bit more wear & tear compared to the same guy throwing 80 IP over 60 appearances. More times warming up, fewer full rest days for the guy who appears in more games. 

 I have leaned more to the appearances philosophy. Just the stress of getting up, pitching a MLB pitch, doing it again a day or two later,  etc. seems the rub. Once you are warm and pitching  does 2O more make much of a difference? But I suspect I am wrong and Sig has data to convince me! Also, maybe this is much more about what makes a starter last?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Povich is going back soon to give us an eighth reliever or if he comes out of the pen or if we go with six starters until the off day.

I think our bullpen has been a lot better than most of our fans seem to believe. The numbers also show our relievers aren't being overused as seems to be popular opinion. It's been pretty amazing how few starts we've had this year of four innings or less. I often wonder, but haven't had time to research, how many teams really have 7-8 relief pitchers better than our group. Are there really any teams with no weak links in the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, orioles22 said:

I wonder if Povich is going back soon to give us an eighth reliever or if he comes out of the pen or if we go with six starters until the off day.

 

I think the plan will be, Povich starts on June 12 and is returned to the minors the following day, replaced by a bullpen guy.   Then Kremer activated sometime after the off-day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we are 7th in MLB in starters innings.   Yet we are 3rd in MLB in relievers used per game, behind only Cleveland and San Francisco.  And both those teams' starters don't last as long, on average, as ours.

So what does all that mean?   We use a lot of relievers and we use them for shorter periods.   Our ratio of bullpen innings to appearances is about 1.02, I think it is the second lowest in MLB.  Numerous times Hyde has had a guy finish an inning and get an out and then go to someone else the next inning.

I *think* (this is just eye test) that Hyde has been getting better than this the last month or so, letting guys go more than one inning so we just have one guy who might be tired the next day instead of two.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, SteveA said:

So we are 7th in MLB in starters innings.   Yet we are 3rd in MLB in relievers used per game, behind only Cleveland and San Francisco.  And both those teams' starters don't last as long, on average, as ours.

So what does all that mean?   We use a lot of relievers and we use them for shorter periods.   Our ratio of bullpen innings to appearances is about 1.02, I think it is the second lowest in MLB.  Numerous times Hyde has had a guy finish an inning and get an out and then go to someone else the next inning.

I *think* (this is just eye test) that Hyde has been getting better than this the last month or so, letting guys go more than one inning so we just have one guy who might be tired the next day instead of two.

Makes sense. Hyde acts like he gets paid by the pitching change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Making some changes on the biz end of things.  Sounds like Bader is gone from his role too..which is great because he’s awful.
    • I love the wall. Love it. I think every Major League ballpark should have dimensions like that. By and large teams build parks with much smaller dimensions than a century ago, despite the players being dramatically bigger, stronger, faster athletes. It makes no sense. The game would be improved with much larger outfields. It would emphasize speed and athleticism over endless lineups of slow sluggers.
    • Yes, so hes a FA, the Discussion should now turn to what Elias or anybody else might offer next year. and it's tough because at 34 he's almost a one year wonder. But I do know this our season came back from trouble all year and Big Al was there to help many times. 
    • We all know you think you're passionate about your team and your ideas. but the way you continually insult people whose ideas you don't agree with, or who disagree with you, is incredibly childish.   It's a form of cyber-bullying.   I'd like to think you're better than that, and wonder why more people don't call you out on it.  Maybe they know it won't change anything? Is it not possible to disagree without having to insult either the person or their thoughts?  I know it's hard to self-reflect and realize that you constantly do this, and maybe make a change for the better, but I kind of expect some insults are now headed my way for trying to make this place a bit less hostile.  
    • We'll see Rubenstein talks a good game, but actions speak louder than words. Also it's on Elias to be willing to make a splash if the right (but also pricey) player become available and wants to be an Oriole. I was never big on an Adley extension even last year with the way catchers age. Gunnar is a player you absolutely lock up to an early contact extension assuming he is even open to it.
    • I think for almost all owners payroll matters more than winning. Even teams like the Yankees are careful with how they go into penalty.
    • For sure. That's why the Hyde quote implies he is a free agent.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...