Jump to content

Runner on 3B and less than two out - who do you want up there?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Last night, when O’Hearn was on 3B with one out, O’s up by only a run, I was thinking to myself, “there’s practically nobody on this team I’d rather have up in this situation than Jordan Westburg.”  Westburg quickly proved me right with his opposite field homer, but that was beside the point.  A fly out would have done just fine.   And I was confident Westburg would get the job done.  

Contrary to @Roy Firestone’s belief, these situations are difficult for major leaguers.   The average hitter gets the runner home from 3B only 51.6% of the time.  The Orioles are currently a small fraction below average in those situations, at 51.2%.   

So who’s been good or bad at it this year?  First, understand that the sample sizes are small.   Nobody’s had more than 18 opportunities with a runner on 3B and less than 2 out, and only 7 players on the team have had as many as 10 chances.  So, all the SSS caveats apply.  Just looking at those with 10+ chances, you’re going to be shocked who leads the pack:

Cedric Mullins 72.7% (8/11)

Adley Rutschman 64.3% (9/14)

Anthony Santander 60.0% (6/10)

Jordan Westburg 60% (6/10)

Gunnar Henderson 50% (6/12) 

Ryan Mountcastle 46.2% (6/13)

Colton Cowser 33.3% (6/18)

Cowser’s ineptitude is particularly galling since he’s had by far the most chances on the team.   

Here are some career numbers;

Westburg 70%

Rutschman 61.9%

O’Hearn 61.0%

Mountcastle 56.9%

Mullins 53.5%

Henderson 52.4%

Urias 52.4%

Hays 52.2%

Santander 51.5%

Mateo 50.8%

McCann 47.1%

Looks like my gut instinct on Westburg was pretty good!  
 

  • Upvote 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rutschman was my first instinct. He has very good bat to ball skills in general, and I think adjusts his approach to match the situation more than most do. I wonder if the new bat path data can back this up-- by the eye test, Adley has a bigger difference between his power swing and contact swing than most of our players. 

Mullins leading the pack this year is certainly a surprise given how much he is striking out and popping up, which are the main ways to ensure a bad outcome in that situation. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have been torn between Adley and Westburg. I think however that Westburg is the kind of player who will find a way even with two strikes on him at the time. So, I pick Westy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Too Tall said:

I would have been torn between Adley and Westburg. I think however that Westburg is the kind of player who will find a way even with two strikes on him at the time. So, I pick Westy.

Westburg is an excellent 2 strike hitter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Yossarian said:

I was going to say O'Hearn.  He is not on your list,  though.   Maybe he's had too few opportunities?  It seems like he hits the ball hard every time he's up there. 

He’s 3 for 4.  As is Stowers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Making some changes on the biz end of things.  Sounds like Bader is gone from his role too..which is great because he’s awful.
    • I love the wall. Love it. I think every Major League ballpark should have dimensions like that. By and large teams build parks with much smaller dimensions than a century ago, despite the players being dramatically bigger, stronger, faster athletes. It makes no sense. The game would be improved with much larger outfields. It would emphasize speed and athleticism over endless lineups of slow sluggers.
    • Yes, so hes a FA, the Discussion should now turn to what Elias or anybody else might offer next year. and it's tough because at 34 he's almost a one year wonder. But I do know this our season came back from trouble all year and Big Al was there to help many times. 
    • We all know you think you're passionate about your team and your ideas. but the way you continually insult people whose ideas you don't agree with, or who disagree with you, is incredibly childish.   It's a form of cyber-bullying.   I'd like to think you're better than that, and wonder why more people don't call you out on it.  Maybe they know it won't change anything? Is it not possible to disagree without having to insult either the person or their thoughts?  I know it's hard to self-reflect and realize that you constantly do this, and maybe make a change for the better, but I kind of expect some insults are now headed my way for trying to make this place a bit less hostile.  
    • We'll see Rubenstein talks a good game, but actions speak louder than words. Also it's on Elias to be willing to make a splash if the right (but also pricey) player become available and wants to be an Oriole. I was never big on an Adley extension even last year with the way catchers age. Gunnar is a player you absolutely lock up to an early contact extension assuming he is even open to it.
    • I think for almost all owners payroll matters more than winning. Even teams like the Yankees are careful with how they go into penalty.
    • For sure. That's why the Hyde quote implies he is a free agent.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...