Jump to content

The top Oriole run differentials of all time


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The 2024 Orioles already have a run differential of +114, compared to +129 all last year.  The O’s are on a +260 run pace.  Here’s how that compares with the biggest run differentials in Orioles’ history:

1969 +262

1970 *218

1971 + 214

1973 +193

1979 *175

1980 +165

1966 +154

1983 +147

1996 +131

2023 +129

1975 +129

The 2024 O’s already have passed every other team in Orioles’ history in run differential, 71 games into the season.  Hopefully they can climb a long way up this ladder.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The 2024 Orioles already have a run differential of +114, compared to +129 all last year.  The O’s are on a +260 run pace.  Here’s how that compares with the biggest run differentials in Orioles’ history:

1969 +262

1970 *218

1971 + 214

1973 +193

1979 *175

1980 +165

1966 +154

1983 +147

1996 +131

2023 +129

1975 +129

The 2024 O’s already have passed every other team in Orioles’ history in run differential, 71 games into the season.  Hopefully they can climb a long way up this ladder.

All the way up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I'd compare THIS team to any team, especially the 1970 team or the 1971 team. Those teams had enormous power and defense and starting pitching. But of course, the game is drastically different and specialised and the power of the athletes is night and day. I  think offensively speaking though, it's hard to compare the 24' Orioles to ANY team in recent memory, including the 2012-13 Orioles with Manny, Reynolds, Hardy, Davis , Schoop and the others..I just hope we can acquire a solid  starter and reliever(or two) for the second half run. Some difficult decisions are ahead for Elias.But this team can sure score runs..

Edited by Roy Firestone
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Roy Firestone said:

I'm not sure I'd compare THIS team to any team, especially the 1970 team or the 1971 team. Those teams had enormous power and defense and starting pitching. But of course, the game is drastically different and specialised and the power of the athletes is night and day. I  think offensively speaking though, it's hard to compare the 24' Orioles to ANY team in recent memory, including the 2012-13 Orioles with Manny, Reynolds, Hardy, Davis , Schoop and the others..I just hope we can acquire a solid  starter and reliever(or two) for the second half run. Some difficult decisions are ahead for Elias.But this team can sure score runs..

1970 - 3.15 ERA, 3.59 FIP, 1.208 WHIP
1971 - 2.99 ERA, 3.40 FIP, 1.182 WHIP
2024 - 3.07 ERA, 3.44 FIP, 1.127 WHIP

Maybe life just seems better when we are young?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roy Firestone said:

I'm not sure I'd compare THIS team to any team, especially the 1970 team or the 1971 team. Those teams had enormous power and defense and starting pitching. But of course, the game is drastically different and specialised and the power of the athletes is night and day. I  think offensively speaking though, it's hard to compare the 24' Orioles to ANY team in recent memory, including the 2012-13 Orioles with Manny, Reynolds, Hardy, Davis , Schoop and the others..I just hope we can acquire a solid  starter and reliever(or two) for the second half run. Some difficult decisions are ahead for Elias.But this team can sure score runs..

Agreed this is the best lineup the Orioles have had in the last 40 years. And that is without any contribution from Holliday, Mayo and Kjerstad.  Just pinch myself daily at all of the position player talent in this organization.

 

One ace starter and one who just needs to build on his current track record to be considered a second ace.  It just hurts to think what could have been if the elbows of Bradish and Bautista held up.  While none of us trust the bullpen the result have been decent to pretty good.  One or two high leverage relivers and this team is better than the Yankees (they may be even without that) and with better postseason luck should be favored to win the AL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+700 in a 3-year span must be pretty rare.

At a glance the Mantle Yankees, Mariano Yankees and Frobby Orioles look like 680's, 690's at their three year peak.

Recent Dodgers teams (maybe having broken baseball?) posted 876 across 2019-2022 if you throw out 2020 as I am fond of doing.     The 2020 numbers are similarly dominant if you extrapolate 60 to 162.

An Orioles team that really flowers (not that it hasn't already) against the Dodgers before Shohei and Mookie and Freddie get too moldy could be an epic World Series if we are lucky enough to get one soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just thinking that I have not seen an O's team this good since 1969-1971.  And Frobby just confirmed it.   Hope they can continue to prove it the rest of the season and through the playoffs.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

The 2024 Orioles already have a run differential of +114, compared to +129 all last year.  The O’s are on a +260 run pace.  Here’s how that compares with the biggest run differentials in Orioles’ history:

1969 +262

1970 *218

1971 + 214

1973 +193

1979 *175

1980 +165

1966 +154

1983 +147

1996 +131

2023 +129

1975 +129

The 2024 O’s already have passed every other team in Orioles’ history in run differential, 71 games into the season.  Hopefully they can climb a long way up this ladder.

Nice list.
 

1996 was plus +46. 

 

1973 had a Pythagorean WL% of 102-60. Underrated team in the franchise’s history. Lost in playoffs and no Frank really impacts it. Lineup was super balanced. Right now Orioles Pyt WL% is .665. Second highest in team history. 1969 is number 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 97 team was basically on this same pace record wise. They were actually 83-44 in mid-August but really fell off in September, though they did rally to make the LCS. Lot of strange losses in there including getting swept at home by the Blue Jays, Brewers, and a poor 14 game home stand in September. IIRC the pitching was great early but guys like Jimmy Key fell apart later in the season. And of course who could forget Benetez, who had a huge hand in us losing the LCS to the Indians. Man that could of been our year to win it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Just Regular said:

+700 in a 3-year span must be pretty rare.

At a glance the Mantle Yankees, Mariano Yankees and Frobby Orioles look like 680's, 690's at their three year peak.

Recent Dodgers teams (maybe having broken baseball?) posted 876 across 2019-2022 if you throw out 2020 as I am fond of doing.     The 2020 numbers are similarly dominant if you extrapolate 60 to 162.

An Orioles team that really flowers (not that it hasn't already) against the Dodgers before Shohei and Mookie and Freddie get too moldy could be an epic World Series if we are lucky enough to get one soon.

The Orioles vs Dodgers this World Series ?   That would be epic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pitching has been really good. I know we are all basically nervous about the bullpen, the effect of losing Bradish, etc, but man the pitching so far has been outstanding. The offense is great but less surprising to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Just Regular said:

+700 in a 3-year span must be pretty rare.

At a glance the Mantle Yankees, Mariano Yankees and Frobby Orioles look like 680's, 690's at their three year peak.

Recent Dodgers teams (maybe having broken baseball?) posted 876 across 2019-2022 if you throw out 2020 as I am fond of doing.     The 2020 numbers are similarly dominant if you extrapolate 60 to 162.

An Orioles team that really flowers (not that it hasn't already) against the Dodgers before Shohei and Mookie and Freddie get too moldy could be an epic World Series if we are lucky enough to get one soon.

If the Orioles play the Dodgers in the WS I don't care how much that ticket is, I'm going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...