Jump to content

Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?


sportsfan8703

Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?  

127 members have voted

  1. 1. Poll - Would you trade McDermott for Scherzer straight up?



Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, EddeeEddee said:

I like Scherzer, but I think the team should focus on someone who is under control beyond the end of the season.  Unless ownership opens its wallet in the offseason, we'll be stuck trading for pitching again very soon.  Even if we do trade for someone controlled beyond the season it's almost definite we'll need more bullpen help or another starter.

Scherzer is a guy who could push them over the top in the PS. Burnes is leaving at the end of the year, yet they traded for him to be the ace of the staff. Max has been there before and the Rangers are looking like they're beyond a WC spot. His recent injury history concerns me. Does no good if they count on him to be a starter and his back (or something else that pops up) starts giving him problems. The stuff, though, still plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Philip said:

Kevin Brown is mainly the TV guy…he is inescapable, like that bad rash that just won’t go away.

I like your analysis of Kevin Brown , lol. I don’t listen to announcers during Orioles/Ravens games.  I rely on closed captioning . The stats on TV and my phone screens are helpful too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading for Scherzer would be a very Lunhow-era Astros move, so it's definitely something to monitor. 

I have some questions on whether the defending WS champs will be selling at the end of the month. It's still a long ways away. They probably should, obviously, but there could be some pride there with not throwing in the towel and "showing faith" in a WS caliber roster, etc, etc. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2024 at 2:09 PM, OriolesMagic83 said:

I would like to trade for Scherzer over about any other starter out there.  He's a rental, so the cost should be rental even compared to someone like Fedde, who seems like a one year wonder.  Scherzer of course has the upside to still produce a dominant performance I believe.  I've been on the Crochet bandwagon, but Scherzer could give the O's 90% of Crochet this year w/o the injury risk, innings limit, and huge prospect cost.

Scherzer doesn’t carry injury risk?  Surely you haven’t followed his last couple of seasons very closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dystopia said:

As of this post it's an exact tie with over 100 votes. Credit to OP for coming up with a reasonable trade proposal worthy of debate and discussion.

It's a good one for sure. I still haven't voted because I still can't decide. 

It's tough! 

I think I lean no because I have a feeling Scherzer can be had for less, or for multiple lesser guys. McDermott is a guy who could be crucial to the pitching staff late in the year a la Hall. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

It's a good one for sure. I still haven't voted because I still can't decide. 

It's tough! 

I think I lean no because I have a feeling Scherzer can be had for less, or for multiple lesser guys. McDermott is a guy who could be crucial to the pitching staff late in the year a la Hall. 

The edit I would make is for it to be anonymous, and allow you to change your vote.

Scherzer is scheduled to start on Th. If he has another 5 IP 2ER or less start then he probably prices himself out of McDermott. 

Things to consider from Texas’ perspective,

- They’re in the same boat as us going forward.  They need depth, but with their position group, they need pitchers that would have playoff start upside.

- As defending champs with a ton of unfortunate injuries, they might stand pat if they get within 4-5 GB of the playoffs.  Heck, maybe they pull an Angels and buy.  I heard Jung is coming back soon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Which makes it strange anyone would go back and look at historical FIP as if it means something. It's also still not very predictive at all. At least ERA represents actual results.
    • And for a little more context for @Allan Bryant, it's been shown that FIP is more predictive of next year's ERA than this year's ERA. Since things like defensive support and the outcome of balls in play are very noisy, or unpredictable. Knowing nothing else about a pitcher with a a 3.00 ERA and a 4.50 FIP, you'd do well to assume his next year's ERA will be closer to 4.50 than 3.00.
    • Article on MLB Trade Rumors about Angels reliever Carlos Estevez. He'd be a rental and a back end BP piece. Should the O's pursue? 
    • Draining the system might be a little exaggerated. Yet, I feel the same way about the years of control aspect.  You have to give some to get some, but I don't see them doing that with with Pitching... especially rentals.  Kjerstad is an interesting thought, but I think I'd be as surprised by them trading one from our active ML roster as a top prospect.  I think that article at the beginning is likely correct that we want to trade from the middle of our farm. I would be shocked if we aren't active in FA for a maybe a #1 SP and possibly 2 #2's, something like that.  I feel like it's more likely we do something akin to what we did last year with Fuji and Flaherty.
    • The Mariners have the 8th-worst offense in MLB. Or 23nd-best. As measured by either wRC+ or OPS+. They look worse than they are because of a park that suppresses runs by 8% or so. On the other hand, that means that their 3.77 team ERA is really just a tick above average. And about on par with the Cubs' 4.46. While you're probably exaggerating about Norfolk, the Tides are playing in 5+ run a game baseball, almost a Colorado context. Factor in that runs are worth whole lot less there and the level of the competition and the Mariners' offense is obviously better. Overall the Tides have a .798 OPS in what's now a hitter's paradise in AAA. If you promoted them all at once to the Majors my guess is they'd OPS something like .650 as a group in OPACY, if they're lucky, or perhaps .600 in Seattle. Or look at it this way... the Tides' pitchers are giving up 5.7 runs per game, a tick better than (by far) the worst MLB team, the Rockies. So if you promoted the whole Norfolk team they'd not only score the fewest runs in MLB, but allow something like seven runs a game and would end up probably playing .150 or .200 ball. A good rule of thumb in today's game is a player will lose 150-200 points of OPS moving from Norfolk to Baltimore.
    • MLB.com: Examining the trade market for starting pitching this season  
    • I'm not sure about every other game when they are out on the road but the ballpark app tells you the jersey color ahead of time. I usually look at it just before I head to a game.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...