Jump to content

I admit it--I gave up


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, dystopia said:

Low line drives are tricky for outfielders. He's not the first outfielder to misjudge that type of hit. 

Not routine. But catchable. 

It happens… on hot sunny high sky days .. he read it as sinking and wanted to prevent a loss by having it dropping in front and instead it sailed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

The 99% catch probability says otherwise.

Good thing statcast catch probability is garbage then, isn’t it?

For f***s sake people, use your damn eyes. There’s no way that ball is caught 99% of the time, it’s so absurd. *Maybe* 80%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, dystopia said:

Good thing statcast catch probability is garbage then, isn’t it?

For f***s sake people, use your damn eyes. There’s no way that ball is caught 99% of the time, it’s so absurd. *Maybe* 80%. 

All of which made me wonder earlier in the thread what it would have looked like if he hadn't broken in at first.

I'm glad he did though. I've watched that replay countless times.  😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is the type of flyball statcast can't gauge accurately. It's looking at pure hangtime, distance, etc. The ball hit mostly right at Verdugo and the way it came off the bat it wasn't the easiest read. Most outfielders will make the catch, but not 99%. A 99% catch probability is the ball Mckenna dropped in Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been covered, there's a strong honorable mention in the win yesterday.

If Adley had just gone into a trot on the ball Mountcastle hit to the SS, assuming it was an easy toss / gimme for the force out, the game would have ended there. But he went full steam and beat the late throw after the bobble. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, G54377 said:

I think this is the type of flyball statcast can't gauge accurately. It's looking at pure hangtime, distance, etc. The ball hit mostly right at Verdugo and the way it came off the bat it wasn't the easiest read. Most outfielders will make the catch, but not 99%. A 99% catch probability is the ball Mckenna dropped in Boston.

Yeah I don't really get it either. I would think a 99% catch probability would be something where it's right to the fielder and he doesn't even have to move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Emory Eagle said:

Watching it off the bat, I was surprised by how far the ball carried.  Of course, I wasn't playing left field for the New York Yankees.  

Yeah, off the bat I thought it was going to be a flare that would drop down in front of Verdugo. Which, I'm assuming he thought as well and the ball just seemed to carry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ledzepp8 said:

Yeah I don't really get it either. I would think a 99% catch probability would be something where it's right to the fielder and he doesn't even have to move. 

It's a 99% chance for a Major League fielder to make the play.  Not 99% for an average HS fielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dystopia said:

thing statcast catch probability is garbage then, isn’t it?

For f***s sake people, use your eyes. There’s no way that ball is caught 99% of the time, it’s so absurd. *Maybe* 80%. 

Agree,. That looked like a very difficult catch even if Verdugo reacted properly, But I didnt see video of his route once Mullins hit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NashLumber said:

Not sure if it's been covered, there's a strong honorable mention in the win yesterday.

If Adley had just gone into a trot on the ball Mountcastle hit to the SS, assuming it was an easy toss / gimme for the force out, the game would have ended there. But he went full steam and beat the late throw after the bobble. 

Excellent point.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, dystopia said:

Good thing statcast catch probability is garbage then, isn’t it?

For f***s sake people, use your damn eyes. There’s no way that ball is caught 99% of the time, it’s so absurd. *Maybe* 80%. 

You’re joking right? He broke in on a ball that was hit almost right at him. It was a terrible read. Period. Full stop.

Edited by Il BuonO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...