Jump to content

2024 1st Round Pick (#22): Vance Honeycutt - OF - (Jr) North Carolina (NC)


Recommended Posts

When we drafted Holliday, one guy I felt would have been worth the pick IF you felt you could fix him was Elijah Green. His profile sounds similar to Honeycutt.  There obviously wasn’t a Holliday there to take over Honeycutt this time but it does show that the Os certainly aren’t scared to go after these types of guys. 
 

I know we saw that with Fabian but he was a little later and cheaper. 
 

Good chance this pick busts but most bottom of the first round picks do and the swing for the fences approach here is welcomed, at least for me.

Its not a HS kid but it’s similar to a project of a HS kid, just with a more proven foundation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DocJJ said:

The ultimate risk/reward pick.   The range of outcomes is the entire spectrum from never sees the MLB to MLB superstar....

I'd be happy with a .250 avg 25 HR 60 steals with gold glove defense outcome!

I personally would have preferred Brecht.  I know the extreme risk with any pitcher, but arms like his don't grow on trees....

 

60 Steals? At what level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scouting grades: Hit: 40 | Power: 60 | Run: 65 | Arm: 60 | Field: 70 | Overall: 50

Mlb.com scouting draft grades. Definitely has some elite tools. O's are trying hard to find Mullins replacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record (not that anyone cares), I'm more in for this pick than the others so far. 

There's a significant risk profile, but also significant upside profile. That fits with the draft in a nutshell. Many will miss no matter the org, but I'd rather miss with guys that I think have a chance to be impact ML players if they do hit. This guy fits that profile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snap poll - by 2030 who has more CF plate appearances for the Orioles - EBJ or Honeycutt?

The 3 picks last night kind of fill in the entire 13 position player group for most of 2026-2027.

C Adley, 1B Basallo, 2B Holliday, SS Gunnar, 3B Westburg, LF Cowser, CF EBJ (platoon), RF Kjerstad, DH Mayo

Bench - OF4 Honeycutt, C Anderson, IF O'Ferrall, Mountcastle Arb3 2026?

Stowers, Beavers, Norby...we'll see July 30th.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Malike said:

As was stated earlier if he can bring his K rate down to ~25% he could be a star.

Are there any good examples of college draftees with lower career MLB K% than college K%? I’m guessing it’s pretty rare so I think 25% is a lot to ask.

That being said, if he is Kevin Kiermaier in CF, then he only needs ~80 wRC+ to be an average MLB player.  That’s certainly achievable with a K% between 26% and 36%.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Warehouse said:

Are there any good examples of college draftees with lower career MLB K% than college K%? I’m guessing it’s pretty rare so I think 25% is a lot to ask.

That being said, if he is Kevin Kiermaier in CF, then he only needs ~80 wRC+ to be an average MLB player.  That’s certainly achievable with a K% between 26% and 36%.

 

Saw someone make a Jose Siri comp.  I think that’s a good comp.   Siri has a career K rate of 34.7% but is a 2 WAR  player.   Hopefully, Honeycutt is a little more hitterish.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I probably missed it but has anyone said anything about his plate discipline?  He has swing and miss but are the swing decisions good or is he just some free swinger that occasionally makes great contact?


I think someone posted an analysis earlier in the thread that called him a guess hitter. I haven’t seen much about his plate discipline, mostly just analysis that he has pitch recognition issues in addition to holes in his swing.

Longenhagen: A swing change might remedy this but there are also breaking ball recognition issues here; Honeycutt had a 56% contact rate against sliders in 2024.

Law: His bigger issue is pitch and ball/strike recognition, as he swung and missed on nearly a third of the pitches he saw, including a 21 percent whiff rate on pitches in the zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Saw someone make a Jose Siri comp.  I think that’s a good comp.   Siri has a career K rate of 34.7% but is a 2 WAR  player.   Hopefully, Honeycutt is a little more hitterish.

 

Yes, I think that is what the front office is projecting for base case - Jose Siri/Drew Stubbs type player that’s worth 2 WAR per year given defense. With hope that the bat is more Brent Rooker/Miguel Sano/Joey Gallo/Nolan Gorman, but with a realistic outlook on ability to bring down the Ks.  That might not sound exciting, but for 22nd pick it’s good value.

Scouting/player dev potential also is likely to play a greater role in this type of pick, so hopefully they see some very specific improvement opportunities.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warehouse said:

Yes, I think that is what the front office is projecting for base case - Jose Siri/Drew Stubbs type player that’s worth 2 WAR per year given defense. With hope that the bat is more Brent Rooker/Miguel Sano/Joey Gallo/Nolan Gorman, but with a realistic outlook on ability to bring down the Ks.  That might not sound exciting, but for 22nd pick it’s good value.

Scouting/player dev potential also is likely to play a greater role in this type of pick, so hopefully they see some very specific improvement opportunities.

 

For reference, below are Career stats since 2014 (min 300 PAs) for players K% at least 32%, plus NCAA K% in final year pre-draft.

Player

MLB K%

wRC+

NCAA K%*

Matt Wallner

34.9%

136

17.5%

Brent Rooker

32.5%

129

18.8%

Edouard Julien

32.2%

123

25.9%

Miguel Sano

36.5%

114

n/a

Ryan Schimpf

33.3%

114

15.3%

James Outman

32.7%

110

22.0%

Chris Carter

32.6%

110

n/a

Luke Raley

32.1%

110

5.7%

Juan Francisco

36.3%

108

n/a

Ryan Noda

33.9%

108

30.0%

Jarrett Parker

32.0%

108

19.2%

Nolan Gorman

33.9%

107

n/a

Joey Gallo

38.1%

107

n/a

Patrick Wisdom

36.7%

106

17.8%

Brandon Marsh

32.7%

106

n/a

Elly de la Cruz

32.3%

105

n/a

Oneil Cruz

33.2%

104

n/a

Keston Hiura

35.9%

103

14.6%

Tom Murphy

32.1%

103

17.7%

Edwin Rios

33.7%

100

13.6%

Will Benson

35.1%

99

n/a

Alex Avila

33.8%

98

19.6%

Tyler Austin

36.9%

96

n/a

Blake Sabol

33.0%

96

15.0%

Trayce Thompson

32.7%

96

n/a

Jose Siri

34.7%

95

n/a

Chris Davis

34.5%

95

n/a

Drew Stubbs

35.6%

94

20.8%

Kirk Nieuwenhuis

34.0%

94

n/a

Matt Davidson

34.8%

92

n/a

Bobby Dalbec

36.8%

90

30.7%

Daniel Palka

34.7%

90

21.4%

Drew Waters

32.8%

90

n/a

 

*final year pre-draft

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
    • Billy Rowell.  Should be capping off a hall of fame career by now but he’s smoking pot and collecting shopping carts at a Food Lion in Jersey.  Jokes aside, De Leon was a guy I had hopes for headed into the season cause we’re thin with pitching.  I thought Beavers was going to be a solid prospect. Mayo for looking completely lost when arriving in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...